Re: [Vo]:How can the Wikipedia process be so good if does not work?

2012-09-11 Thread Moab Moab
The rules/policies are absolutely ok when applied by editors with common sense or for non-controversial articles. For articles on controversial topics a group of editors will feel that they have to protect the article from evil POV pushers. They have a mission: Wikipedia must not expound fringe

Re: [Vo]:OT: Gene-Doping

2012-09-11 Thread Terry Blanton
Not to diminish the work done by ARPA-E, take a look at this from DARPA: http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/09/10.aspx It really gives me the creeps. T

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy

2012-09-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote: Yes you did say. You said that hot fusion researchers are trying to 'suppress' it and indeed hot fusion research is operating with extremely big money. As noted that was Abd, not me. However, it is true that the plasma fusion scientists played a

RE: [Vo]:OT: Gene-Doping

2012-09-11 Thread Jones Beene
... brave new world, indeed ... and they chose not to show the version with the ray gun (high powered semiconductor laser array) ... -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton Not to diminish the work done by ARPA-E, take a look at this from DARPA:

Re: [Vo]:OT: Gene-Doping

2012-09-11 Thread ChemE Stewart
Not exactly stealthy... On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: ... brave new world, indeed ... and they chose not to show the version with the ray gun (high powered semiconductor laser array) ... -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton Not to

Re: [Vo]:OT: Gene-Doping

2012-09-11 Thread Ron Wormus
Maybe they should just go back to horses mules .. much cheaper. --On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:07 AM -0400 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Not to diminish the work done by ARPA-E, take a look at this from DARPA: http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/09/10.aspx It

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy

2012-09-11 Thread James Bowery
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote: Yes you did say. You said that hot fusion researchers are trying to 'suppress' it and indeed hot fusion research is operating with extremely big money. ... I suppose

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy

2012-09-11 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 16:12 Dienstag, 11.September 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote: Yes you did say.

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy

2012-09-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote: not over here (Germany). As far as i know, the MPP, which is the biggest May-Planck-Institute, tried to replicate F/P and failed. so the issue was settled. I do not know about this test, but it would be ridiculous to reject cold fusion based

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy

2012-09-11 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 20:23 Dienstag, 11.September 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:   not over here

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a conspiracy

2012-09-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote: This is a completely different institute, and one probaly has to know the intricacies of the Max-Planck organization. The same or different, you would think that the Director's opinions might have weight when it comes to accepting or rejecting

Re: [Vo]:Perpetual motion machine. New idea!

2012-09-11 Thread Harry Veeder
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, there was some discussion about this alleged perpetual motion machine. It was elegant, perhaps too elegant, and therefore it is probably a fake. Evolution of perpetual motion

Re: [Vo]:How can the Wikipedia process be so good if does not work?

2012-09-11 Thread Eric Walker
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: No, I hope it withers away. I appreciate the sentiment. But I'll place myself on record for thinking that Wikipedia is incredible. It is one of the handiest things to come about in the last ten or so years. Obviously

[Vo]:New paper on cavitation/sonofusion

2012-09-11 Thread pagnucco
Cavitation-Induced Fusion: Proof of Concept - Max I. Fomitchev-Zamilov Cavitation-induced fusion (also known as bubble fusion or sonofusion) has been a topic of much debate and controversy and is generally (albeit incorrectly) perceived as unworkable. In this paper we present the theoretical

Re: [Vo]:Compressed spring - what happens to the stored energy at different temperatures?

2012-09-11 Thread Harry Veeder
For my own edification I continued to think about the issue of potential energy gain and loss and I realise it depends on the interatomic forces within the spring. Cooling the compressed spring reduces the vibrations of the atoms in the spring, and allows the interatomic forces to strengthen

[Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR

2012-09-11 Thread pagnucco
Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs) http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen -- or at -- http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slidesharereferer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen# - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface plasmons

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR

2012-09-11 Thread Jeff Berkowitz
Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative temperature coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed wires begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... Jeff On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Low Energy Neutron

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR

2012-09-11 Thread Jeff Berkowitz
To answer my own question: yes, here http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf on page 3, in item (3) of the numbered list. Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is an interesting

Re: [Vo]:New paper on cavitation/sonofusion

2012-09-11 Thread Axil Axil
Doesn’t LeClair’s cavatation patent take the Quantum Potential Corporation out of the fusion from cavitation business? Cheers: Axil On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:46 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Cavitation-Induced Fusion: Proof of Concept - Max I. Fomitchev-Zamilov Cavitation-induced

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy on Hi-Temp Superconductivity LENR

2012-09-11 Thread pagnucco
Jeff, The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp superconductivity seen in fractal materials - e.g., High-temperature

Re: [Vo]:New paper on cavitation/sonofusion

2012-09-11 Thread pagnucco
Axil, Good question. Does anyone know the patent attorney, David French? I believe he specializes in these issues. -- LP Axil wrote: Doesn’t LeClair’s cavatation patent take the Quantum Potential Corporation out of the fusion from cavitation business? Cheers: Axil On Tue, Sep 11, 2012