Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

I wrote: > Irregular samples produce bogus results. Two labs looking at the same > sample sometimes come up with different results. > I mean samples with irregular shapes, or with powder. With some mass spec techniques you need good conductivity. That is what I have heard. I do not know the

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > This is a key point to rule out the theories of Rossi's defenders. > If IH was sincere, and enthusiastic as it is clear, this remove the > theories that they tried to fake a negative result. What was fake was the >

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

With all due respect to Higgins, I concluded at the time he was grasping at straws. This was based on the detail in The following links: lenrftw.net/assessing_ecat_report.html https://animpossibleinvention.com/2014/10/08/new-scientific-report-on-the-e-cat-shows-excess-heat-and-nuclear-process/