,
Lou Pagnucco
Hello Jed,
I just spoke to a friend, and we agreed that it is time to buy the
ultra-short oil ETF (code DUG) - I am waiting for oil keep ascending in
price for the next couple of days, then I am going to add some DUG to my
portfolio.
It is getting very difficult to believe so many smart people
Yes. I think you are correct.
The slides' text is terse. It does appear that the more current
experiments fall short of Patterson's results. But, unless the reaction
products have been measured incorrectly, some anomalous nuclear reactions
are occurring.
On 11-10-18 04:13 PM,
of a Nuclear Isomer in 65Fe...
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v100/i13/e132501)
Extremely low contamination would suffice.
I'm not sure, but I believe that detection would be difficult.
Unlikely, but I would welcome opinions.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Probably, Robin, but the relatively recent discovery of the 65Fe isomer
(which likely has been lurking in the universe for a long time) makes me
wonder if other long-lived isomers have escaped attention, and written off
as statistical errors in mass measurements.
Coaxing 1 gram of 65Fe to ground
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source of some yet unidentified isomers.
I am quite perplexed that isomeric-65Fe went undetected for so long.
Perhaps others have also
that (perhaps,
radial or spherical) symmetry.
Regards,
Lou Pagnucco
On 11/06/2011 02:49 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source
A couple of recent Widom-Larsen LENR presentations are at:
Lattice Energy LLC- Mystery of the Missing Nickel and Vanadium-Nov 6 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-lcc-mystery-of-the-missing-nickel-and-vanadiumnov-6-2011
Lattice Energy LLC Company Vision-September 11 2011
I omitted this recent Widom-Larsen LENR presentation:
Lattice Energy LLC-'Facts' about W-L Theory and LENRS-Oct 20 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-facts-about-wl-theory-and-len-rsoct-20-2011
I am not an experimentalist, but is testing W-L theory expensive?
If we forget about measuring heat, several of Larsen's presentations may
provide enough details for experiments that could yield transmutations.
See, for example -
Lattice Energy LLC- Mystery of the Missing Nickel and
reaction) rates, but does not appear to account for the thermalization of
high-energy gammas or neutrons.
I welcome others' impressions.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
to account for the thermalization of
high-energy gammas or neutrons.
I welcome others' impressions.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
.; (Poquoson, VA)
Assignee: USA as represented by the Administrator of NASA
I found it on Lewis Larsen's (Lattice Energy LLC) website at:
http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen
Any opinions on whether this is relevant to any commercial LENR efforts?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
Also, since this is a NASA patent, doesn't it have to go through a fairly
rigorous review process? and have some empirical data backing it?
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
[...]
If there are some empirical data obtained by NASA on lenr or the WL
theory,
I would
I don't think this has been posted to Vortex before.
I believe it describes Brian Ahern's approach to LENR.
Does this imply he believe Rossi's results?
Any comments?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
From: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55221791/Clean-Enenergy-From-Nano-Materials
/**START**
New Clean Energy
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=512913
I don't think this has been posted to Vortex before.
I believe it describes Brian Ahern's approach to LENR.
Does this imply he believe Rossi's results?
Any comments?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
[...]
Thanks Axil, Fran, Jones,
- for lots of intriguing information.
You have put lot of effort into this.
On the quantum entanglement/nonlocality issue - possibly relevant is:
Undetectable quantum transfer through a continuum
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2901 - but interesting even if not.
The Ni-64
I am not sure if it's relevant or what it's worth, but in the following
paper -
Anomalous Nuclear Phenomena Assocoated with Ultrafast Processes
www.iscmns.org/asti06/jianglaoshi2.pdf
- the authors speculate on whether the concept of torsion field
contributes to the LENR phenomena they observed
More controversy between LENR competitors ---
Lewis Larsen-Lattice Energy LLC-Comments re Mr. Andrea Rossi E-Cat
Technology-Nov 26 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lewis-larsenlattice-energy-llccomments-re-mr-andrea-rossi-ecat-technologynov-26-2011
The CONCLUSIONS slide (#34) states -
Weak Interaction LENR effects show the best prospects with the nuclear
burning of Ni proved possible with significant heating outputs.
It seems to me there is agreement on results, but not on theory, which is
encouraging.
Am I overlooking something?
Lou Pagnucco
More
Nanoparticles.
Vibronic Energy Technologies' upcoming presentation on Dec-7 may include
results using various approaches outlined in the patent application.
Comments?
Lou Pagnucco
A portion of the patent application follow:
Title: AMPLIFICATION OF ENERGETIC REACTIONS
Document Type and Number: WIPO Patent
Thanks, Robert
And, here is some forgotten LENR evidence from 1951 --
Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs ca 1950s-Sternglass Expts-Einstein Bethe-Nov 25
2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-ca-1950ssternglass-exptseinstein-bethenov-25-2011
Maybe established theory has
The Widom-Larsen transmutation experiments, e.g., electon beam impinging
on copper target (slides 21-23 in Widom's presentation [*]) certainly are
verifiable/falsifiable. It would be suprising if NASA's Bushnell has not
verified them. Many other credible researchers confirm them. Is it
-ph/0104035
Quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in an Unstable System with Two Bound
State
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502075
Reifenschweiler's results are a real puzzle.
Lou Pagnucco
In an experimental series performed by Piantelli, he observed the
production of either heat or gamma radiation
Lewis Larsen (Widom-Larsen) just posted a paper entitled:
Are LENRs causing some of the 'UFO' dust observed in the Large Hadron
Collider? Maybe somebody should look.
http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llccould-lenrs-be-producing-ufos-in-large-hadron-colliderdec-7-2011
An
enhancement at metallic interfaces due to quantum confinement
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0714
Pardon if this has already been discussed on Vortex.
Comments appreciated,
Lou Pagnucco
?or others?
Comments appreciated,
Lou Pagnucco
Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs and Cold Fusion are Different Concepts - Dec 13 2011
http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-and-cold-fusion-are-different-conceptsdec-13-2011
Joshua,
I believe, Zawodny does explain the creation of ULM neutrons through the
plasmonic creation of heavy electrons. See (slide 16) of
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/2010-Zawodny-AviationUnleashed.pdf
I am unsure as to whether Zawodny is correct, but page 9 of INTENSE
FOCUSING OF
A pretty counter-intuitive phenomenon.
So were super-conductivity and lasing.
I believe both emission and absorption of radiation can be strongly
enhanced in a volume of entangled (coherent) particles - even when it's
spatial extent is greater than the radiation wave-length.
See:
National Instruments has an automated software package --
LabVIEW System Identification Toolkit
http://www.ni.com/pdf/labview/us/sys_id_toolkit.pdf
-- which (I assume) can converge to an optimal control strategy for an
unknown multi-input/multi-state system which may be non-linear, noisy and
If Sterling properly interpreted Rossi - i.e. -
According to Rossi, NI will be creating the controls to monitor and
regulate this process. He said that their stipulation for the agreement
is that all the instrumentation for the E-Cat plants have by National
Instruments and logo on the
Good information. Thanks for posting.
Possibly relevant to LENR, but too complicated to be sure.
Masahiro Hotta has other papers on this at --
http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/AND+au:+Hotta_Masahiro+abs:+energy/0/1/0/all/0/1
His more recent paper --
Quantum Energy Teleportation: An
I think that the frequency of the outgoing down-converted photons will
remain the same whether the incoming high frequency photon is absorbed by
one atom or collectively by N-atoms. A coherent multi-atom absorption
will create a Schroedinger-Cat-like state of one excited atom and (N-1)
ground
reactions to take any side in the controversy.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Horace,
Thanks for the comment.
What is needed are some toy models with some simple simulations.
I will check out your theory.
Do you believe any new physics is required
- or does standard QM suffice?
I am getting pretty boggled by the complexity of it all.
LP
There is no need for
.
--- The patent application seems to cover quite a wide range of
implementations.
Unless this is a different Steven Jones, did he become a believer 14-years
after the 1989 CF-brouhaha?
Any insights?
Lou Pagnucco
.
--- The patent application seems to cover quite a wide range of
implementations.
Unless this is a different Steven Jones, did he become a believer
14-years
after the 1989 CF-brouhaha?
Any insights?
Lou Pagnucco
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
?
Any insights?
Lou Pagnucco
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Lewis Larsen considers some of the criticisms of LENR theory by CF
dogmatists ironic.
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cold-fusioneers-new-ploy-ad-hoc-redefinition-of-technical-term-fusiondec-30-2011
Too bad it's human nature to form opposing-warring factions.
Perhaps some relic of
Daniel, you may be correct.
I do not know.
However, both Akito Takahashi and Hideo Kozima may regard W-L viable.
See -- Second Cold Fusion Theorist Cites Widom-Larsen Theory
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/23/second-cold-fusion-theorist-cites-widom-larsen-theory/
Takahashi appears to
Again, I am not sure.
Looking at the slide on p.105 at JCF12 Abstracts at--
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2011/JCF12/JCF12ExtendedAbstracts.pdf
-- I see the reaction 59Ni + e- 59Co + v + Q
I cannot read Japanese, but this looks like a heavy electron capture,
but that is just a
Larsen has a website with slide presentations at:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen
He provides a lot of hypotheses which could be tested for what seems
modest expense. Most would involve looking for transmutations - which
would be a lot less contentious than calorimetry results.
Many have
I agree, Jed.
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
technically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
anomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He should publicly issue a
challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him to witness and monitor
their
Yes, but watching paint dry is ultra-exciting if the payoff is trillion$.
Gibbs appears to be happy writing Forbes filler-pieces.
He should get more creative.
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes. It would be Win-Win-Win.
Courtesy of coldfusionnow.wordpress.com
Edmund Storms on The Nuclear Active Environment and Metals That Work
coldfusionnow.wordpress.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SorcxYf8VYg
He discusses Rossi, F-P, Piantelli, Ni-H, Pd-H
Title: WordPress.com
So why doesn't he throw down the gauntlet?
How hard is that??
Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly
be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it
the threshhold as well.
Are these assumptions reasonable? Is this check on W-L theory correct?
Comments appreciated,
Lou Pagnucco
[1] EMP AND HPM SUPPRESSION TECHNIQUES - http://dodreports.com/ada360541
In nanowires, conductance itself can change in a complex nonmonotonic,
nonlinear way as a function of current density. For example, see --
Quantum Suppression of the Rayleigh Instability in Nanowires
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0006237
James Bowery wrote:
Something that occurs to me about
on Widom-Larsen theory.
It looks quite reasonable to me, but I could be mistaken.
I would appreciate corrections or criticisms.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
[1] Stability of Metal Nanowires at Ultrahigh Current Densities
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0411058
Horace, thanks for the reply. You wrote:
You should keep in mind that in nanowires, even (laser induced)
thermal pulses move at 2x10^6 m/s, the conduction band electron speed.
Yes. There are electron-lattice mechanical couplings
(e.g,, pinches, phonons, ...) that complicate a simple,
Horace,
You parse comments way too precisely.
I should have said that your observations raise questions.
For instance, a key one is -
The WL math and QM is possibly controversial (e.g. via Hagelstein and
Chaudhary), but the logic and common sense in problem definition and
conclusions are
New possibilities for developing minimal mass, extremely sensitive,
collective many-body, quantum mechanical neutrino 'antennas'
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-collective-manybody-qm-neutrino-antennasjan-10-2012
A pretty venturesome proposal. It seems testable.
The
?
Does it overlap any current LENR approaches?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
* THE PATENT + EXCERPTS *
HIGH ENERGY CRYSTAL GENERATORS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
Patent 7741615 Issued on June 22, 2010.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7741615/fulltext.html
Abstract
Ferroelectric, pyroelectric
My questions were motivated by definition #4 in the patent which refers to
deuterating the crystal, but it is clear (I think) from the context that
this is still just as part of proposed small, conventional (hot) impact
fusion - not really cold fusion, at all. Fusion is not claimed to take
place
The website has been down for some time now.
It keeps returning the message: Bandwidth Exceeded ... try again later.
It sounds like a pretty sophisticated theory that only a few can properly
assess. Does it make any testable predictions? Or does it provide any
insights into the CF/LENR results
Thanks, Brad
That link works.
However, the theory rests on QCD (quantum chromodynamics) which I do not
understand. For those trained in QCD, it might be worth
google-translating the more detailed Russian web page:
http://viktor19451.narod.ru/
Aside from the diagrams, the translation looks
have not really seen related material before.
Hopefully, some more elementary introductory papers are available. If I
find any, I will post pointers to them. Do you know of any?
Regards,
Lou Pagnucco
Thanks for posting this - and it is intriguing in one way but flawed in
another - certainly
Pagnucco
At 11:53 PM 1/16/2012, you wrote:
I asked a close
friend (PhD physicist) and he said the same thing as Krivit; that fusion
[...]
Now, W-L theory predicts *lots* of transmutations. These are not
observed to be correlated with the heat. Transmutations are indeed
observed, but at levels way
Marten,
You might want to google or bing nickel nanowire grow or nickel whisker
grow.
Some of these techiques are hazardous, so better use extreme caution.
My guess is that (poly-)crystalline nanostructures are most promising.
Hello guys
I have a q, i have been reading all the posts about
Along those lines, you might want to read -
PROGRESS ON DUAL LASER EXPERIMENTS
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Hagelsteinprogresson.pdf
EXCERPT:
We have continued our experiments using duel laser stimulation of
electrochemically loaded PdDx. In earlier work, we used two properly
oriented and
to (somehow) close the loop in this huge state-space to stay in the
tiny and elusive stable optimal operating spaces.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Lou,
This kind of photon stimulation was of great interest a few years ago and
is
known as the Letts/Cravens effect. They had a tortuous path to get
Jones,
You wrote:
The video in question demonstrates that even a bulb not designed to
operate as a plasma emitter, can create an local plasma, and produce
copious light with a few watts of input (like the CFL which can operate
at a subwatt level).
Did the experiment measure radiant+thermal
On a 2008 CNN Larry King Show, former air force officials showed videos of
UFOs which I think may be ball lightning.
The videos are available starting at --
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTBqwTuSuMM
Has anyone seen these?
If so, any opinion on whether ball lightning is a good explanation?
.
Is it possible the lightning ball was due to some unusual localized
lasing effect leading to the theorized isotopic changes?
- Lou Pagnucco
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Equation for Light Leptonic Magnetic Monopole and its Experimental Aspects
Georges Lochak
http://arxiv.org/abs
of high-temp Cooper-pairing, plasmons, and anomalous
fusion. Some other papers by the author also address this issue:
http://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Dvornikov_M/0/1/0/all/0/1
Any opinions on this series of papers?
- Lou Pagnucco
Axil Axil wrote:
When protons enter a micro cavity
Perhaps, someone could devise a long-running magnetic energy extractor
building on the simple approach in:
A Magnetic Linear Accelerator
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/lin_accel.pdf
If so, I bet it would be popular in toy stores.
William Beaty wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012,
Since Energetics Technologies (featured on 2009 60 Minutes tv-show) uses
ultrasound -
Ultrasonically-excited electrolysis Experiments at Energetics Technologies
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIultrasonic.pdf
- is it possible that their wideband ultrasound is really inducing
cavitation fusion
I have a hard time seeing why Rossi would pay any attention to this:
(1) If his e-cat is real, $1M is a miniscule distraction.
(2) If it's a mistake or fraud, replying would foolish.
On 2012-02-14 17:14, Chemical Engineer wrote:
_Smith Offers $1 Million Prize for Successful E-Cat Demo_
Better still, if Smith is convinced the e-cat is not real, why not pledge
the $1M to a worthy cause if it's not verified by end of 2012?
- or offer bets through an on-line site like intrade.com?
Otherwise, it's hard to be sure he's not a flamboyant publicity seeker.
An X-Prize would be an
Rossi is certainly an enigmatic character, but it is highly improbable
that he would slow his race with Defkalion if they both have real LENR
technology for such a small amount, nor would Rossi accept it if e-cat is
a fraud. Either way, Smith can be pretty sure his offer will receive no
response.
Hopefully, this helps -
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2007/1999-RussGeorge-APS-Presentation.pdf
I'm attempting to obtain a copy of Production of Helium-Four from
Deuterium Using Nano-Particle Palladium by Russ George, published in the
May 6, 1999 issue of Cold Fusion Times on page 1.
Microstructures
http://www.cmth.ph.ic.ac.uk/photonics/Newphotonics/pdf/lfplslet.pdf
Comments/corrections very welcome,
Lou Pagnucco
, nonlocality, Bose condenscation, ... really needed?
I'm uncertain. Good data is hard to find.
Thanks for the reply,
Lou Pagnucco
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Alain Sepeda wrote:
if you red WL theory, they say that the neutrons are generated
from coherents pairs of p+e, and the result is a group of possible
I believe that W=L theory proposes that LENR is initiated by strong
focusing of E-M fields on metal hydride surfaces. I may be
misunderstanding, but wouldn't activation energy loss be too small to
detect in the energy released?
I don't understand Jones Beenes' point.
If correct - how do neutrons
Too many points to address.
Perhaps, the Celani-Srivastava presentation at the March 22 CERN LENR
Colloquium will discuss them, since Srivastava is a proponent.
Jones Beene wrote:
Well - all of us on vortex would love to be able to focus on a consistent
theory that works. W-L theory seems
an good analogy would be an arrow. Only the
tip's electrostatic coupling to the rest of the arrow gives it piercing
power.
BTW, I am not sure of any of the above. Just speculating.
I welcome corrections.
Thanks for the reply,
Lou Pagnucco
Jones Beene wrote on Mon, 20 Feb 2012:
-Original
Jones,
There too many theories to be partisan. They all may be wrong.
First - E-C cannot occur in hydrogen.
Probably true, but plasma is not hydrogen.
Plasma e-p wave functions are not stationary.
Second - I agree - relativistic collisions can be ruled out.
That's why I conjectured direct
Tech Bubble 2.0: It's a Private Thing
http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/ipo-facebook-ipo-social-media-social/2/22/2012/id/39516
Along with private, secretive dark pool markets, investment markets
appear to be becoming exclusive clubs.
Hope this doesn't happen to LENR, if it
Lewis Larsen has just posted a presentation on W-L theory
covering both history and theory. It is timely, since one
of W-L's proponents (Y.N. Srivastava) will be co-presenting
at CERN with Celani on March 22.
A closer look at LENRs in condensed matter systems
George Miley and Xiaoling Yang have just published the abstract -
A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf
- which will be presented in the
ADVANCED CONCEPTS: LENR, ANTI-MATTER, AND NEW PHYSICS Session
Axil,
Miley, et al, are working on Ni-H cells also.
I am getting the impression that the old timer LENR researchers are hung
up on deuterium and Helium 4 ash as the only true path toward LENR
success.
Not true. Ni-H is the golden path ahead. You will find gold where others
are finding it,
A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf
To be presented March 22, at The Woodslands, TX at
NETS (Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space meeting)
http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2012/NETS2012Home.html
Corrections:
Title line should read 350W/Kg - date is March 23 - session URL is
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf
Does anyone know whether Dick Smith's offer extends to Miley's lab, and
whether Miley would accept?
Lou Pagnucco
A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low
:
Corrections:
Title line should read 350W/Kg - date is March 23 - session URL is
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf
Does anyone know whether Dick Smith's offer extends to Miley's lab, and
whether Miley would accept?
Lou Pagnucco
A Game-Changing Power Source Based
In nano-particles/wires/structures, ambient electric and magnetic fields
can be superfocused and amplified by a factor of ~50K. This seems quite
counter-intuitive and pretty spectacular.
I appreciate the interesting responses to my questions Xavier. From the
information you supplied I draw
http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=15344
it, or misunderstood part of the
application.
Does anyone have any insight?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Axil wrote:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=nWbjAQAAEBAJpg=PA2source=gbs_selected_pagescad=2#v=onepageqf=false
Energy Generation Apparatus and Method
This patent application explains the mechanism for the H
Brillouin's website and the paper describing their theory at -
http://www.brillouinenergy.com
http://www.brillouinenergy.com/BrillouinEnergyHypothesis.pdf
gives more details.
I believe that a number of metal alloys are used for hydrogen storage.
It makes sense that they do not limit materials to
There are several prediction markets that allow legal wagers on political,
economic, technological, ..., events.
The Wikipedia page at -
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market - lists and describes them:
Prediction markets (also known as predictive markets, information
markets, decision
You make a excellent point, Jed.
I have heard accusations that some of these markets may have been
manipulated by certain political election campaigns. It probably doesn't
require a huge investment to move the odds.
However, these markets are probably too small for a major corporation to
make
Lewis Larsen (Lattice Energy LLC) has posted a new presentation entitled -
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs)
New neutron data consistent with WLS mechanism in lightning - at -
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen
He presents evidence that electrons and protons in coherent/collective
motion
a few radioactive gamma sources inside nanowires
and observing whether gammas are attenuated and/or directionally scattered
during current flow?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 08:59 AM 4/5/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
This is hot, so to speak. Cough, cough ... that can be understood
Jones,
Sure, some of those experiments produce hot plasmas, but there are many
experimental results which appear to produce transmutations with
temperatures too low to produce collisions energetic enough for fusion -
unless the energy is focused and hidden in infinitesimal volumes.
My
Jones,
Good points.
I do not know the Oppenheimer-Phillips effect. I will research it tonight.
There could be a number of confounding effects that coexist.
Our tendency to look for a relativistic collision behind every nuclear
event (except radioactivity) could be the problem.
Lou Pagnucco
resources.
There's a slim chance I can get it done.
Probably expensive. Too bad I lost the lottery.
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 03:29 PM 4/5/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd,
Regarding the absence of gammas -
... is it reasonable to suppose that a high energy gamma would
exploding wire experiment did appear to produce Helium.
Their original paper is -
EXPERIMENTAL ATTEMPTS TO DECOMPOSE TUNGSTEN AT HIGH TEMPERATURES
- Amer. Chem. Soc. 44 (1922)
http://www.uf.narod.ru/science/WendtIrion.pdf
Would this provide some link between CF and LENR if reproduced?
Lou Pagnucco
in how magnetic fields can act as reservoirs
for delocalized momentum, you might want to read -
Thoughts on the magnetic vector potential Am.J.Phys. Nov-1996
http://www.uccs.edu/~jmarsh2/links/AJP-64-11-1361.pdf
Lou Pagnucco
Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
). Shouldn't gamma energies
and directions change as current flow is modulated? If not, is the
calculated effective electron momentum incorrect, are the electron surface
density or scattering cross-sections too low, or is my interpretation
wrong?
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote
1 - 100 of 560 matches
Mail list logo