[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Peter Gluck]

Thanks for the compliment - I am an expert websearcher,
see "Informavore's Sunday No 439" at my blog Ego Out
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com, I have won more
contests- e.g. "who wants to be a millionaire" with time
control (you get points not money) Always happy and ready
to help, if you have such search problems
Peter


2011/1/23 Terry Blanton 

> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Peter Gluck 
> wrote:
> > it's here in Italian
> >
> http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?upn=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.it&TabControl1=TabCV
>
> Many thanks, Peter.  You are a gentleman and a scholar!
>
> Dr. Levi certainly looks qualified to participate in this
> demonstration.  But, best of all, his CV would imply that he is a
> fairly young man compared to the typical LENR researcher.  This is a
> good thing in my opinion!
>
> T
>
>

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Terry Blanton]

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Peter Gluck  wrote:
> it's here in Italian
> http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?upn=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.it&TabControl1=TabCV

Many thanks, Peter.  You are a gentleman and a scholar!

Dr. Levi certainly looks qualified to participate in this
demonstration.  But, best of all, his CV would imply that he is a
fairly young man compared to the typical LENR researcher.  This is a
good thing in my opinion!

T

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Peter Gluck]

it's here in Italian

http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?upn=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.it&TabControl1=TabCV


Peter

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Terry Blanton  wrote:

> Does anyone have Dr. Levi's CV?  You can't just google his name.
>
> Well, you can; but, there's many of him.  :)
>
> T
>
>

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Terry Blanton]

Does anyone have Dr. Levi's CV?  You can't just google his name.

Well, you can; but, there's many of him.  :)

T

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Terry Blanton]

I am a bit puzzled by this statement:

"During the test the main resistor, used to ignite the reaction, two
failed to defective welding. Even That condition in the reactor
started operation successfully using the other resistors But The
duration of the experiment in full power ( ≈ 40 min) Was "to short" to
observe a self sustaining reaction."

Too short?

Maybe it does not translate well.

T

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Jed Rothwell]

Notice that Levi was careful to mount the machine and control box so that
you can see underneath it:

"Prudentially I have lifted the control box in search for any other
eventually hidden cable and found none."

He has a sufficiently suspicious mind. That's good.

- Jed

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi “Ni-H” reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi

[Jed Rothwell]

This is helpful! Although I hope they do post more data. You can see these
are old professors since they post screen images of the computer data
instead of the output from the instruments converted directly into a graph.

This report says the probe used with the RH meter is an HP474AC. See:

http://www.deltaohm.com/ver2008/uk/depliant/hd2101.1-.2_D_uk.pdf

QUOTE:

Relative humidity and temperature probes using SICRAM module

HP474AC Pt100 5…98%RH -40°C…+150°C

Accuracy

±2.5% (5…95%RH)
±3.5% (95…99%RH)


If Horace Heffner is correct, these readings will be meaningless. I cannot
help thinking that the professor who did this probably knew what he was
doing; the instrument manufacturer probably made an RH meter that produces a
useful result at the rated temperature (up to 150°C); and the "
engineeringtoolbox.com" site I referenced is probably right.

Maybe there are different definitions of wet and dry steam percentages.
Anyway, why would they make an RH meter that serves no useful purpose at the
rated temperature? Why would anyone measure the RH and temperature except to
determine how wet the steam is?

(The meter probe in question measures RH and temperature.)

- Jed