On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:20 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Rizzi sez:
...
I think that the end of the hoax is approaching.
I doubt we are witnessing a hoax, though it's possible I am in error.
Another thought came to mind in regards to the megawatt reactor
design: Why for their
Hi,
On 29-9-2011 8:27, Horace Heffner wrote:
Looking at the other side of the coin, the probability of catastrophic
failure, suppose there is a 0.1% chance per hour one of the E-cats can
blow up spreading steam throughout the container. There is thus a
0.999 probability of success, i.e. no
From MoB:
...
Looking even a bit more closer again this would mean that if the chance
of explosion is 0.1% per hour then the chance of explosion is 2,77e-7
per second at any given moment for a single Ecat, which would result
for
52 Ecats into 1-((2,77e-7)^52) = 0,134 or 0,00144% at
Hi,
Oeps, the commas must be periods so this should of course be red as:
Me thinks you are wrong. Your statistical probability calculation is
based upon the fact that the chance of a single Ecat exploding is
influenced by it's behaviour earlier, which of course is not true.
Statistically
Rizzi sez:
Guys, the dream is over. It’s time to wake up.
It's been my experience that the harder I try to convince others as to the
correctness of my opinion, the more obvious it becomes to others as to whom I'm
really trying to convince.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Statistically each Ecat has it's own independent chance of explosion at any
given moment which does not change over time.
I believe that is incorrect. Boiler explosions are caused by the overall
temperatures and pressures of the machine. When a
There is NO evidence that Rossi's newer generation E-Cats have ever or will
ever explode. Rossi has maintained that in the event that they melt down
that they simply stop producing heat.
If you happen to be on Rossi's invitation to see his 1MW plant, by all means
take whatever precautions you
From ecat builder:
There is NO evidence that Rossi's newer generation
E-Cats have ever or will ever explode.
The concerns I've seen raised do not necessarily have anything to do
with Rossi's reactor cores - whether they work or don't, or are likely
to explode. The concerns I've seen raised
ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
There is NO evidence that Rossi's newer generation E-Cats have ever or will
ever explode.
Anything that produces steam can explode. Wet coal, for example, is very
dangerous.
If you happen to be on Rossi's invitation to see his 1MW plant, by all
Hi,
On 29-9-2011 16:28, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com mailto:manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Statistically each Ecat has it's own independent chance of
explosion at any given moment which does not change over time.
I believe that is incorrect. Boiler explosions
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
The concerns I've seen raised have far more to do with
the delicate management of a whole lot of highly pressurized steam - a
megawatt's worth of steam.
Ladies and gentlemen, please don't try this at home!
Exactly. That is what experts have been telling
Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
In 1906, the Wrights knew *far* more about aerodynamics and the physics of
flight than anyone else in the world. They should have concentrated on what
they knew best, leaving other details to other experts. It was a waste of
time for them to work on
On Sep 29, 2011, at 4:02 AM, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
On 29-9-2011 8:27, Horace Heffner wrote:
Looking at the other side of the coin, the probability of
catastrophic failure, suppose there is a 0.1% chance per hour one
of the E-cats can blow up spreading steam throughout the
container.
The failure of one module of the Rossi 1 MW reactor will not cause the
entire 1 MW reactor to fail. Its performance will only degrade gracefully.
When the core of the module overheats or melts, the surface of the nickel
nanopowder will fail before the nanopowder enclosure will fail since the
The sentence below: This is totally consistent with the probability
of failure in one E-cat in one hour being 5%. should read: This is
totally consistent with the probability of failure of at least one E-
cat (of 52) in one hour being 5%.
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
If you look at my text you will see I wrote catastrophic failure
not just failure. This means an E-cat blows up spreading steam
throughout the container, injuring anyone present, and preventing
access to the container, causing the test to fail. I think I was
clear on this point. I did
On Sep 29, 2011, at 4:37 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From MoB:
...
Looking even a bit more closer again this would mean that if the
chance
of explosion is 0.1% per hour then the chance of explosion is 2,77e-7
per second at any given moment for a single Ecat, which would
Rizzi sez:
...
I think that the end of the hoax is approaching.
I doubt we are witnessing a hoax, though it's possible I am in error.
Another thought came to mind in regards to the megawatt reactor
design: Why for their first generation of products are they building
a 1 MW module? Many have
18 matches
Mail list logo
