These vortexes are problematical. Both the LeClair and Proton-21 vortexes a
stable for a very long time; like ball lightning. A Polaritron
vortex lasts only 20 to 30 picoseconds due to coulomb repulsion. So these
long lived EMF vortexes must be without charge to be stable for so long: so
they
I am not sure that a translation would be of much help. With LeClair I
think you need to try and separate out the hypothesies as to the
mechanism from the observations of what happened. Too often LeClair
confuses the two. There is a lot to be said for the
'Method/Results/Discussion' format
Which aspects of the 'results' do you think are true and why?
[m]
On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Nigel Dyer wrote:
I am not sure that a translation would be of much help. With LeClair I
think you need to try and separate out the hypothesies as to the mechanism
from the observations of
The bits of the results that I think are true are that he has managed to
get fairly spectacular damage using cavitation bubbles and that there
was something more interesting going on than just bubble collapse. The
answer to why comes from having spent something like four hours with
Mark
LeClair’s experimental descriptions mostly rings true with my understanding
of LENR in cavatation.
The *Key* to LENR is optical vortexes (AKA solitons). Nanoplasmonics
mechanisms load light into nano-sized optical resonators in unlimited
amounts. These solitons produce hugely powerful tightly
When I had a look at the tracks that were present on the samples that
Mark showed us, I was left with the clear impression that what was going
on was not simply ballistic. It did not look as if the cavitation
bubble shot out a lump of something that gouged its way along the
surface of the
6 matches
Mail list logo