Since currently reviewing and proof-reading the HTML 5 spec draft
(again) I'm feeling free to send (rather non-technical) /suggestions/
and eventual typos to this list. This tiny first part refers to CVS
revision 1.904 [1].
* Please drop or the idea that the working group should even spend
time
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Simon Fraser wrote:
Some web applications may need more control over focus than is offered
by the existing focus management proposal:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#focus
Specifically, it's hard to write JavaScript that has more explicit
control
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Brad Fults wrote:
A few things in Section 3.5.2:
There is always an element focused; in the absence of other elements
being focused, the document's root element is it. [1]
This sentence is awkwardly worded and as far as I can tell, document's
root element is
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Brad Fults wrote:
There are a couple of problems I have found in this section.
If it isn't possible to show the entire element in that way, or if the
argument is omitted or is true, then the user agent must instead simply
align the top of the element with the top of
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Adele Peterson wrote:
I started implementing the hasFocus attribute in WebKit, but then I
realized that IE and Firefox 3 both implement it as a function. Should
the spec change to match the existing implementations?
Fixed.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E
Hi!
I'm a bit puzzled about how to interpret the poster attribute on
HTMLVideoElement:
The poster attribute gives the address of an image file that the user
agent can show while no video data is available. The attribute, if
present, must contain a URI (or IRI).
Is the intention that this image
If you don't mind someone weighing in who's been working with the Nintendo
Wii for the past year and a half, I have found that the quality setting in
Flash is tremendously useful. While the march of Moore's law has ensured
that Flash on the desktop is zippy, it has also created a gap whereby
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Philip Jägenstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm a bit puzzled about how to interpret the poster attribute on
HTMLVideoElement:
The poster attribute gives the address of an image file that the user
agent can show while no video data is available. The
Nothing in the document can be further down than the bottom. If the
document scrolls past the bottom, it shows nothing under the bottom but the
bottom is in the middle of the window. This is inevitable if the document
is short so that it can be displayed without scrolling (and without scroll
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:40:55 -0300, Matthew Paul Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote on 27/05/08 07:47:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:01 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Matthew Thomas wrote:
...
Many applications
On Jun 2, 2008, at 15:40, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
The disadvantage of using a data-* attribute is that more kinds of
mistakes would be undetectable by a validator. It would have no idea
that (a) the value of the attribute must be the ID of an element
elsewhere in the document, and (b) each
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:51:39 +0200, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like the idea of trying to encode the datatypes of data-*
attributes in a validator-sensitive way. What datatypes would a
validator support for data-* attributes? The HTML5 datatype library used
by
12 matches
Mail list logo
