was entirely inspired by
Aron's post).
Is this a viable option?
Cheers,
Remy Sharp
Left Logic
, but
I've tested Firefox 3.5 manually and it passes/small ;-)
Cheers,
Remy Sharp
Left Logic
___
I'm running a conference in Brighton on 20-Nov called:
Full Frontal JavaScript Conference
http://2009.full-frontal.org
).
Remy Sharp
On 7 Aug 2009, at 14:19, Remy Sharp wrote:
Hi,
I know Bruce Lawson has mentioned that this has been brought up
before, but I couldn't find it in the archives (searching small),
so I'd like to bring it up again.
The HTML 5 spec says:
Small print typically features disclaimers
if the issues still apply to small element.
Cheers,
Remy Sharp
Left Logic
___
I'm running a conference in Brighton on 20-Nov called:
Full Frontal JavaScript Conference
http://2009.full-frontal.org
in the small tag.
Remy Sharp
On 15 Aug 2009, at 12:29, Smylers wrote:
Where small might be useful is another page which has a
competition on
it (in regular sized text) followed by:
p
smallTerms and conditions apply. For full details see the
a href=http://www.bbc.co.uk/terms/;standard BBC
soon?
Cheers,
Remy Sharp
of two evils
(though semantically I know which I prefer), option #3 is the only
sensible choice if you want authors to use these elements in a
reasonable amount of time.
Remy Sharp.
objections? At the same time, does someone want to raise this as a bug?
Cheers folks,
Remy Sharp / everyman developer :)
On 16 May 2011, at 08:20, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 19:11:09 +0200, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Eric Carlson
On 17 May 2011, at 09:04, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Or do you mean a spec bug?
I meant a spec bug :)
