Hi kmx,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, kmx k...@atlas.cz wrote:
So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT
You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from:
http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable)
Great! I'm using it right now to test some modules.
On 4.4.2013 16:46, Michiel Beijen wrote:
Hi kmx,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, kmx k...@atlas.cz wrote:
So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT
You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from:
http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable)
Great! I'm
On 13.3.2013 23:14, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
-Original Message- From: kmx
Hi,
is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry
Perl 5.18.x series ?
I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess
Rob is also subscribed to
-Original Message-
From: kmx
ActivePerl binaries (ppm packages) will not be usable on the 64int
architecture Strawberry Perl - unless, of course, ActiveState also start
providing packages for the 64int architecture. (I've no idea what
ActiveState are planning to do in this
-Original Message-
From: kmx
Hi,
is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry
Perl 5.18.x series ?
I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I
guess
Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works.
I've been testing it
