Re: [wmii] time for a new wmii release?
> Yes, it definately is. I'll release an alpha as soon as I can write some new > release building scripts. I'm looking forward to a new release. Should probably ease support, too? In other words, not having to worry about wmii-3.6 versus wmii-hg. --Nate On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:03:33PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote: >> >> I've been using (and keeping up with) wmii-hg for years now and find >> that it is very stable. >> >> Perhaps it is time for a new stable release? (It's been almost 2 >> years since wmii-3.6!) > > Yes, it definately is. I'll release an alpha as soon as I can write some new > release building scripts. > > -- > Kris Maglione > > The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should therefore be > regarded as a criminal offense. > --Edsger W. Dijkstra > > >
Re: [wmii] time for a new wmii release?
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:03:33PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote: I've been using (and keeping up with) wmii-hg for years now and find that it is very stable. Perhaps it is time for a new stable release? (It's been almost 2 years since wmii-3.6!) Yes, it definately is. I'll release an alpha as soon as I can write some new release building scripts. -- Kris Maglione The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should therefore be regarded as a criminal offense. --Edsger W. Dijkstra
Re: [wmii] time for a new wmii release?
Hi, 2009/5/13 Suraj Kurapati : > Hello, > > I've been using (and keeping up with) wmii-hg for years now and find > that it is very stable. > > Perhaps it is time for a new stable release? (It's been almost 2 > years since wmii-3.6!) > > Thanks for your consideration. > > P.S. Release early, release often! ;-) +1 :)
