Re: [delicious-discuss] Re: lazy sheep

2005-09-01 Thread joshua schachter
That's pretty much it, exactly. I keep a relatively well-defined tag library - because I find it to be useful, to me. However, I've simply run out of time trying to keep it maintained - I just want to throw my link into del.icio.us and forget it (for now). I should also bring up that the

Re: [delicious-discuss] Re: lazy sheep

2005-09-01 Thread joshua schachter
John Resig wrote: I'm really confused as to why you are disabling this - with the recent change that I made, it does not effect the performance or usability for other users and, in fact, many many people find this to be of great help when using del.icio.us (myself included). It helps to

Re: [delicious-discuss] Re: lazy sheep

2005-09-01 Thread John Sullivan
joshua schachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would prefer that it either ask or add no tags. I suppose we need to standardize and support some sort of read later tag, perhaps system:readlater How about just system:later? Lots of links aren't meant to be read, and it's shorter. --

Re: [delicious-discuss] Re: lazy sheep

2005-09-01 Thread pwlin
Or maybe more complete, it can be like system:later:read Because system:later:download , system:later:forschool and system:later:blogabout would be as valuable as system:later:read Would it be possible to tag the last part of system:later:... ? On 9/2/05, John Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]