Hi,

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de>wrote:

> The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache
> trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed.
>

Ok, and thanks Julien for raising the point too.
I will then wait until we receive a response from the foundation.


>
> Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to retire
> from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports anymore
> due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under Apache
> flag out.
>

This point was added to the post.


>
> The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done to
> seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-)
>

Added too.

The draft still is available here :
https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit

Thanks everyone for the feedback,
Awaiting the final name before publishing, feel free to send additional
input in the meantime,
-- 
Nicolas


>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard <jvermill...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I
> > would like to remeber two points :
> > - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress
> > - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the
> > Apache PR for that
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino <n...@ez.no> wrote:
> > > Dear everyone,
> > >
> > > I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the
> loop,
> > > since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today.
> > >
> > > Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input :
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit
> > > (anyone
> > > should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments).
> > >
> > > I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback !
> > > --
> > > Nicolas
> >
>

Reply via email to