On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello Devs,
any comments on this one?
No, it looks fine to me. Where do we send the report?
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
On 07/24/2010 03:22 PM, sebast...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebastian
Date: Sat Jul 24 13:22:51 2010
New Revision: 978868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=978868view=rev
Log:
Fix 16867.
we should stick to our old commit guidelines,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
for another project I needed to give advice on the coding standard used
by Apache Zeta Components. There is some very old version of the eZ
Publish coding style in [1] (from 2001) but no reliable, recent source.
So I think we should document our
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
I have studied the guidelines for releases in the ASF and tried to make
up a release process document for us. Please find it attached for
discussion. You can also find it in our SVN under
docs/release_process.txt
My comments:
Component
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
On 11/07/2010 11:55 AM, Thomas Ernest wrote:
Here comes questions :
A/ What is your opinion about the proposal automate full package release ?
B/ What are advantages of separating full package release process from
component release process ?
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I insist of keeping our PEAR channel as the primary
distribution way.
Absolutely.
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
as far as I can see there are two major points in this discussion:
1. Providing updates for single components in short time frames could
bring people to an update hell, when they need to download and upgrade
some components every week.
They don't
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Henri Bergius wrote:
Spot
A spot is an actual location on a map. This consists of WGS-84
latitude and longitude. Optionally spots may have an altitude,
timestamp, accuracy and a human-readable description.
You surely would like to call this a point instead? Also,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
On 11/24/2010 01:03 PM, Henri Bergius wrote:
Spot
A spot is an actual location on a map. This consists of WGS-84
latitude and longitude. Optionally spots may have an altitude,
timestamp, accuracy and a human-readable description.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Manuel Pichler wrote:
Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 11:21 +0100 schrieb Tobias Schlitt:
[...]
On 11/17/2010 03:58 PM, Jerome Renard wrote:
However, for a custom app, it does not make sense to bundle all Zeta
Components if you only want to use e.g. Graph or Mail
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
since there was no further feedback on my patch for the coding style
documentation, I'd like to call for votes on it. Find the patch to
vote on attached again.
IMO, in this case just having a lazy consensus is good enough.
[X] +1 yes, this is our
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Maxime Thomas - Wascou wrote:
My point was very simple, I've got messages to index with a class like id
(int), message (string).
In SolR, I've defined in my core, only this two fields with id as uniqueKey
and message as defaultSearchField.
At first, I did not set up
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 25.01.2011 09:48, schrieb Tobias Schlitt:
If anyone has time for this, please get in touch with Infra to see how
we can best set up a channel.
All we need is a web-accessible directory to which we let Pirum write
its files. But I, too,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On 01/25/2011 10:02 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 25.01.2011 09:48, schrieb Tobias Schlitt:
If anyone has time for this, please get in touch with Infra to see how
we can best set up a channel.
All we need is a
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Jerome Renard wrote:
I started to create an Ant based version of the Makefile available in
website/
The problem with the Makefile is that it does not work at all on Mac
Os X and is kind of hard to read.
I am afraid that nobody else uses Ant here, so I would oppose
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Gav... wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Jerome Renard wrote:
I started to create an Ant based version of the Makefile available in
website/
The problem with the Makefile is that it does not work at all on Mac
Os X
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, jero...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -45,12 +47,16 @@
* /code
*
* @property int $validity
+ * The maximal amount of seconds the session is valid.
+ * @property int $idleTimeout
* The amount of seconds the session can be idle.
* @property string
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Jerome Renard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Derick Rethans der...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, jero...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -45,12 +47,16 @@
* /code
*
* @property int $validity
+ * The maximal amount of seconds the session
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, jero...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jeromer
Date: Thu Aug 4 08:21:14 2011
New Revision: 1153777
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1153777view=rev
Log:
- Added runExtractorCommand()
# I apologize for the No new line at end of line message
# I tried to fix this in
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Guys,
we have missed a report.
Hmm, I didn't see a reminder notice at all actually. I wonder why not?
In addition I don't see very much activity on this podling.
Are there still active people in this project? If so, please speak up.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I am afraid that i do not find enough time anymore to actively mentor
this project :-( In addition, I have so much exhausting discussion at
the ASF recently, that even when I would have the time, I would not
have the energy to mentor. I am
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
The February 2012 [1] report from Zeta Components is still missing. If
you don't have a report ready for this month, please note so in the
wiki page and prepare to report again next month.
I've added one now.
What's the status of the Zeta Components
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
Derick already opened an Organization on Github and I guess all current
committers will get write access to it.
I've also set-up a mailinglist: z...@lists.xdebug.org
You can subscribe by sending an email to zeta-subscr...@lists.xdebug.org
cheers,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
Derick already opened an Organization on Github and I guess all current
committers will get write access to it.
I've also set-up a mailinglist: z...@lists.xdebug.org
You can subscribe by sending
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, James Pic wrote:
Can't apache just pass the repo to say Derick or something ?
https://github.com/apache/zetacomponents
I think we should split it up, so that we can/could orphan specific
components. I doubt anybody wants to maintain PhpGenerator f.e.
cheers,
Derick
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, André Rømcke wrote:
but don't we need to setup a light organization / project governance around
this, some people that have a stake in the project and can oversee the
github account[, merging pull requests], github webpages, travis setup and
potentially also do some
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
In addition you guys need to urgently make up new mailinglists - Infra
might close zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org pretty soon.
There is a mailinglist already:
z...@lists.xdebug.org
You can subscribe to it by sending a mail to
27 matches
Mail list logo
