akonadi
--
ghosTM55
Shanghai Linux User Group
Keep It Simple Stupid
http://www.ghosTunix.org
http://facebook/ghosTM55
http://twitter.com/ghosTM55
depend on akonadi, such as
KAlarm and even Akregator.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.
Mankind’s most thruthful word is: perhaps.
pgp4vdYfdPwaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am 05.10.2014 um 19:10 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On 05/10/2014 18:59, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
My real beef is with akonadi and kdepim. I could never get the damn
thing to actually work or to tell me what it was doing in a manner I
could understand. The last straw was around KDE-4.4 when
; the window comes up, but without account indicators in
the status bar. And while I still had my mails set up with Akonadi, I was
regularly asked for the password, even though it was stored in the wallet.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services
of
additional full HDD load after login (once I removed the mail resources,
login time until idle went from 1:05 to ~33 seconds).
What?!! Each time you load the desktop/start kmail?! This can't be right!
Well, starting KMail is quite quick. But so it was before Akonadi times,
because KMail used
the
switch for myself, I made some performance comparisons.
So, in case anyone is interested, here are my results.
The only thing I don't really like is of course the increased RAM usage.
While the old installation took 400 MB of RAM after Login to KDE (Akonadi is
a hog), it now
management thingy, featuring
a number of storage backends (almost like what akonadi was originally intended
to do, lol). I simply set lbdb up to use KAddressBook’s std.vcf file and then I
can query it using lbdbq.
Like so:
- file: ~/.lbdbrc ---
METHODS=m_inmail m_vcf m_abook m_muttalias
protocol file and such errors.
I, too, had been having qt blocking qt, and I had no idea what was
causing it. I guess I caused it myself because I updated qt with
--nodeps (long story, kde 4.11.2 needs akonadi-server 1.10.3 which
needed the then keyworded qt 4.8.5).
Both 4.8.4 and 4.8.5 were
free RAM
means more cache, which means a faster system in the long run. Currently, KDE
after logon needs 150 MB on 32 bit, and 250 MB on 64 bit (without akonadi for
now). But awesome WM rocks on a netbook anyway.
--[ Questions begin ]
So I’m
64: it uses about 50% more memory, 32 bit builds are a little faster.
The RAM argument is the most convincing one right now, since more free RAM
means more cache, which means a faster system in the long run. Currently, KDE
after logon needs 150 MB on 32 bit, and 250 MB on 64 bit (without akonadi
really like is of course the increased RAM usage.
While the old installation took 400 MB of RAM after Login to KDE (Akonadi is
a hog), it now takes 500. The memory meter now stands always at least at 50%
(3 GB available). I will have to tune down multitasking a bit.
The following items first
11 matches
Mail list logo
