Hi list,
does anyone know, in which packages are the commands ``at'', ``batch'',
``atq'', ``atrm'' and the ``atd'' daemon?
Thanks in advance.
Frank
PS: Please don't respond with Use cron!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Frank Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 12:56
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] at, batch, atd
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:42 +0200, Christoph Gysin wrote:
Frank Schafer wrote:
does anyone know
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:32:03PM -0700, Penguin Lover darren kirby squawked:
Where the heck is at at?
Where you'd expect :)
[07:42 PM]wwong ~ $ equery belongs atd
[ Searching for file(s) atd in *... ]
sys-process/at-3.1.8-r11 (/etc/init.d/atd)
sys-process/at-3.1.8-r11 (/usr/sbin/atd)
though
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:31 +0100, Michael Kintzios wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Frank Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 12:56
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] at, batch, atd
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:42 +0200
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:56:09 +0200, Frank Schafer wrote:
.. because I still haven't Gentoo installed again ;) so I have to search
the Online Package Database. Searching ``at'' there finds a lot but
not the at package.
Searching for ^at$ works.
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 32:
'
'' 'ATZ'
'OK-AT-OK' 'AT+CGDCONT=1,\IP\,\web.omnitel.it\'
'OK-AT-OK' 'ATD*99***1#'
'CONNECT' '' )
phone_number_ppp0=()
then I made the net.ppp0 link, but when I issue
/etc/init.d/net.ppp0 start
the script says ppp0 doesn't exist!
Am I doing
On 08/15/2009 08:37 PM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Samstag 15 August 2009 19:24:09 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
system has to be rebuilt twice. When you get a new toolchain
(system), you need to rebuilt it with itself. The first time you do
that, it is rebuilt using the *old* toolchain. The
-parameter value /dev/null 21
but this results in a idle copy of this process and a defunct
child.
nohup may do what you want.
Or you can do it with at, if atd is running
echo my_program -o file.txt -parameter value | at now
--
Neil Bothwick
A wok is what you throw at a wabbit.
signature.asc
tried things like
my_program -o file.txt -parameter value /dev/null 21
but this results in a idle copy of this process and a defunct
child.
nohup may do what you want.
Or you can do it with at, if atd is running
echo my_program -o file.txt -parameter value | at now
using linux/utf8:
init-+-4*[Xvnc]
|-atd
|-bdflush
|-cdahubd
|-4*[clipman]
|-crond
|-devfsd
|-3*[dosexec-+-dosexec]
|`-xcrt]
|-kapmd
|-keventd
|-khubd
|-kinoded
|-kjournald
|-klogd
|-ksoftirqd_CPU0
|-kswapd
On 08/15/2009 08:07 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
[...]
1. FWIW, I found the following note:
To use this code transformation, GCC has to be configured with
--with-ppl and --with-cloog to enable the Graphite loop transformation
infrastructure.
on the following page:
[ stopped ]
atd
[ stopped ]
bttrack
[ stopped ]
consolekit
[ stopped ]
courier-authlib
[ started ]
courier-imapd-ssl
[ stopped ]
courier-pop3d
[ stopped ]
courier-pop3d-ssl
[ stopped ]
crypto-loop
[ stopped ]
device-mapper
[ stopped ]
dhcrelay
[ stopped ]
dnsextd
[ stopped ]
gpm
your computer up at certain times to record
TV.
Earlier today you were asking for something to schedule recordings. I would
have replied then and suggested MythTV or atd, but you'd already had a reply
you were happy with by the time I saw it.
Now you're trying to fix another problem which has
the best answer to this is MythTV.
A week ago you asked about waking your computer up at certain times to record
TV.
Earlier today you were asking for something to schedule recordings. I would
have replied then and suggested MythTV or atd, but you'd already had a reply
you were happy
-in attempts. (I have locked myself out once or twice from a hotel
when I accidentaly hit the capslock...) Basically you just add a
target to be blocked to the iptables and use atd to remove it some
time later.
(*)If you don't know iptables, man iptables.
What do you use to maintain these white
, initscripts, pm-utils, inetd, acpid, syslog, watchdog,
cgrulesd, cron, atd
...which obviously makes the code more complex, which goes against the
KISS rule[2]. On a personal note, I like this quote best (from [2]):
It seems that perfection is reached not when there is nothing left to
add, but when
memory usage: 538624 swap 0
atd memory usage: 462848 swap 0
agetty memory usage: 364544 swap 0
agetty memory usage: 362496 swap 0
agetty
17 matches
Mail list logo
