Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:00:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > * [OT]What's the difference between intervention and > interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically Crass - > oops! Correct - than the other. It's not about political correctness but perspective. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Adam Carter
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:00:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > * [OT]What's the difference between intervention and > > interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically C

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:31:42 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:00:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > * [OT] What's the difference between intervention and > > interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically Crass - > > oops! Cor

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
What's the difference between intervention and interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically Crass - oops! Correct - than the other. -- Regards, Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] PostgreSQL Vs MySQL @Uber

2016-08-12 Thread james
s I am doing here. OK? So, the interested can do their own research, and others can trudge along their merry way. (The apologies are sincere, but, I am a bit crass:: no apologies on that note). hth, James

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel options and udisk

2012-09-17 Thread Michael Mol
problem. That kind of logic is the same kind of logic that leads to stories such as but why won't you plug in your computer? because it makes a lot of noise. Why won't my computer work? Because it needs power, so you need to plug it in. But it makes a lot of noise. Apologies for the crass analogy

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel options and udisk

2012-09-17 Thread Dale
. Apologies for the crass analogy, but it really is the same thing, just at a different technical depth. But as I said, the package did compile without it. Since it did compile without it, it was not a hard, must have, requirement. If the package would have failed to compile, then I would either

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Yes: The linux devs can rescind their license grant. GPLv2 is a bare license and is revocable by the grantor.

2018-12-27 Thread R0b0t1
: > > This was cross posted so many places I have to preface: I got here > from the Gentoo list. If this only makes it to the crossposter forward > or follow up on the information as you see fit. > > The post is crass but still has technical merit. More importantly he > seems to be right, the i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Yes: The linux devs can rescind their license grant. GPLv2 is a bare license and is revocable by the grantor.

2018-12-27 Thread R0b0t1
This was cross posted so many places I have to preface: I got here from the Gentoo list. If this only makes it to the crossposter forward or follow up on the information as you see fit. The post is crass but still has technical merit. More importantly he seems to be right, the idea