[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using `genkernel all' on latest sources (linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r6) I
ended up with no `fuse' module.
As far FUSE is concerned, it might be advisable to stay away from the
in-kernel FUSE and use the standalone sys-fs/fuse package. At
least ntfs3g doesn't
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:37:07 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
As far FUSE is concerned, it might be advisable to stay away from the
in-kernel FUSE and use the standalone sys-fs/fuse package. At
least ntfs3g doesn't work with the in-kernel fuse.
Really
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:49 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hm. Not so sure anymore. I seem to remember, that either sys-fs/ntfs3g
or sys-fs/fuse would completely refuse to build, if in-kernel fuse was
built.
sys-fs/fuse builds the tools
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:33 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Harry Putnam did
opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
modules=fuse
Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in
the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d/modules).
But `fuse
On 7/15/07, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Vladimir Rusinov,
But for some packages (e.g. ntfs3g) you need to completely disable
in-kernel fuse and use modules from sys-fs/fuse. (Altually, it depends
on kernel package versions).
Really? I've only used ntfs-3g
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
modules=fuse
Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in
the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d/modules).
But `fuse' never gets auto loaded. There must be something more or
different it needs.
Your syntax is correct
=
[d531][root][~] /usr/bin/mtpfs /mnt/drive1
Device 0 (VID=0bb4 and PID=0ca8) is a HTC EVO 4G LTE/One V (ID2).
Android device detected, assigning default bug flags
fuse: device not found, try 'modprobe fuse' first
[d531][root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have sys-fs/fuse installed.
# eix -I fuse
[I] sys-fs/fuse
Available versions: 2.6.1 2.6.3
Installed versions: 2.6.3(06:56:33 03/20/07)(-kernel_FreeBSD
kernel_linux)
Homepage:http://fuse.sourceforge.net
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have sys-fs/fuse installed.
# eix -I fuse
[I] sys-fs/fuse
Available versions: 2.6.1 2.6.3
Installed versions: 2.6.3(06:56:33 03/20/07)(-kernel_FreeBSD
kernel_linux)
Homepage
Is there some good overlay that maintains a python-fuse ebuild and the
like?
Ok, I found this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63789
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:37:07 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
As far FUSE is concerned, it might be advisable to stay away from the
in-kernel FUSE and use the standalone sys-fs/fuse package. At
least ntfs3g doesn't work with the in-kernel fuse.
Really? It works here, as do sshfs and encfs
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:49 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hm. Not so sure anymore. I seem to remember, that either sys-fs/ntfs3g
or sys-fs/fuse would completely refuse to build, if in-kernel fuse was
built.
sys-fs/fuse builds the tools but not the module if the kernel module is
detected
On Thursday 19 April 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:49 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hm. Not so sure anymore. I seem to remember, that either sys-fs/ntfs3g
or sys-fs/fuse would completely refuse to build, if in-kernel fuse
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
hm. What's unclear? You have build fuse only for this kernel
version. When you update your kernel, you'll need to rebuild
all the external modules (fuse, maybe alsa, ...). module-rebuild
is your friend.
Whats unclear is why I have to do anything extra
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:40:11 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
By the way: Which one is better (or are they the same?): ntfs-3g or
ntfsprogs with USE=fuse?
ntfs3g is the driver, ntfsprogs contains the mkfs, resize, fsck etc.
programs, the fuse USE flag enables support for fuse filesystems
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:05:06 +0400, Vladimir Rusinov wrote:
Really? I've only used ntfs-3g with the in-kernel fuse modules and it
has done all I asked of it.
With some older kernel versions, you need to install sys-fs/fuse
modules.
Maybe, but who want to run old software? New software
Hi,
I am looking for the python bindings to FUSE, since I want to write a
little thing taking advantage of it.
Unfortunately in the portage tree I can only find bindings for ruby and
perl, but not for python. It could be the moment to learn ruby or perl,
but it would be another project
called.
I've been trying to auto load the `fuse' module using this:
modules=fuse
Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in
the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d/modules).
But `fuse' never gets auto loaded. There must be something more or
different it needs.
Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil, back on 15 July, you stated that you used ntfs-3g with only the
in-kernel fuse modules.
That's what I'm doing as well.
When I try that, I get the following error:
error while loading shared libraries: libfuse.so.2: cannot open shared
I need a little coaching on qmerge usage.
I'm trying to emerge sys-fs/zfs-fuse. The merge fails on a known bug,
a duplicate of another bug... 303623
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303623
In the comments... (#3) someone has asked to make the emerge once a
specific file is edited
said, someone may need that. I wouldn't see a
problem with smbmount being in /bin. FUSE deserves similar treatment.
LVM's another that probably deserves special treatment.
If you allow FUSE you've already failed, because arbitrary programs can
be required by FUSE filesystems. Suddenly your ssh
/mountPoint: creating directory
* checkpath: mkdir: No such file or directory
* Mounting vmblock ...
mount: mount point /proc/fs/vmblock/mountPoint does not exist[ !! ]
* Starting vmware-tools ... [ ok ]
vmblock needs fuse enabled in the kernel. I'm
... [ ok ]
vmblock needs fuse enabled in the kernel. I'm not sure if it needs a
module or not, I know my kernels use fuse as a module.
If fuse is set in the kernel already, then app-emulation/open-vm-tools
is not built with the 'fuse' USE flag.
Bingo - thanks Daniel
/gvfsd-fuse can not
be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw-- root:root
Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not
exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on
gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root?
My
Hi Norberto,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can I do to be able to mount an arbitrary ISO image to an
arbitrary mount point from the command line as non-root user?
fuse-iso ?
While fuse-iso would certainly do this for me, I was hoping it's
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:05 -0500, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
Neil, back on 15 July, you stated that you used ntfs-3g with only the
in-kernel fuse modules.
When I try that, I get the following error:
error while loading shared libraries: libfuse.so.2: cannot open shared
object file
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Hello Iain Buchanan,
hey, stop answering, this was to Neil!
Hey! ! was asleep! :)
As Alexander has already posted, you still need sys-fs/fuse to provide
the libraries, but it defers to the kernel for the modules (which saves
rebuilding it each time you
a
problem with smbmount being in /bin. FUSE deserves similar treatment.
LVM's another that probably deserves special treatment.
If you allow FUSE you've already failed, because arbitrary programs can
be required by FUSE filesystems. Suddenly your ssh client should be pushed
to /, or your telnet
Philip Webb writes:
> One further important question : do I need to enable Fuse in the kernel ?
> From the man page for simple-mtpfs:
"SIMPLE-MTPFS (Simple Media Transfer Protocol FileSystem) is a file
system for Linux (and other operating systems with a FUSE
implementation, such
Am 30.05.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291540
new stable release 0.6.9 out today.
ebuild also in the mentioned bug.
the subject slightly:
Do you happen to know the exact syntax for that kind of rule or
whatever it's called.
I've been trying to auto load the `fuse' module using this:
modules=fuse
Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in
the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d
, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd 204,
the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all.
But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not
be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw-- root:root
Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group
...
I did try rebooting one last time, but it shows the same error when
starting up automatically too...
Anyone have any ideas how to resolve this? Or does it need to be resolved?
Thx
vmblock needs fuse enabled in the kernel. I'm not sure if it needs a
module or not, I know my kernels use
...
=
[d531][root][~] /usr/bin/mtpfs /mnt/drive1
Device 0 (VID=0bb4 and PID=0ca8) is a HTC EVO 4G LTE/One V (ID2).
Android device detected, assigning default bug flags
fuse: device not found, try 'modprobe fuse' first
[d531][root][~] modprobe fuse
modprobe: FATAL: Module fuse
invisible.
I thought it was already there:
sys-fs/zfs-fuse
Yes, there is a fuse module. I meant in-kernel
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Where do we list modules we want loaded at boot?
When I run modprobe fuse
WARNING: Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf, all config files
belong into /etc/modprobe.d/.
/etc/modprobe.conf doesn't actually appear to have any modules listed
but does list a herd of aliases
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:14:00 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Is there any sort of FUSE+libdvdread+libdvddecss utility that can be
pointed at an encrypted DVD and then present to user-space apps
an unencrypted-filesystem-tree-view of that DVD?
media-video/vobcopy will copy the DVD files
is system-critical. I run samba and don't need
it for boot, but like you said, someone may need that. I wouldn't see a
problem with smbmount being in /bin. FUSE deserves similar treatment.
LVM's another that probably deserves special treatment.
If you allow FUSE you've already failed, because
) that anything mounting a filesystem
and making it available is system-critical. I run samba and don't need
it for boot, but like you said, someone may need that. I wouldn't see a
problem with smbmount being in /bin. FUSE deserves similar treatment.
LVM's another that probably deserves special treatment
The password has been in use for mnths and definitely correct.
The lengthy emerge.log from `update world' is appended to this
message.
[...]
encfs is a FUSE filesystem, and you emerged fuse during this update. The
first thing to check is whether you have broken encfs or just this
filesystem
Sorry, no, I meant plugging one extension lead into another ... exactly
what you are NOT supposed to do.
>
>> (It is mandatory, according to code, if you hard-wire a feed off a ring
>> you must separate it with a 16 Amp fuse.)
>
> I don't recognise that either. It sounds like a s
and definitely correct.
The lengthy emerge.log from `update world' is appended to this
message.
The output from genlop --list --date whenever would have been more
compact and a lot easier to parse.
encfs is a FUSE filesystem, and you emerged fuse during this update. The
first thing to check is whether
sshfs-fuse (GIT version 2012/09/13)
fuse 2.9.1-r1
I can't use fuse from GIT since it breaks many packages on my
machine.
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
It works here with sshfs-fuse-2.4. Maybe it is because the directory
lives directly under /? Try mounting it in a directory inside
There's a FUSE implementation which is considerably slower (being
FUSE)
IIRC the author of Linux-ZFS cites the NTFS implementation as
demonstrating that FUSE can produce quite acceptable performance.
Of course, maybe performance of NTFS would be better were it a kernel
module, but I get
is built and running.
Using `genkernel all' on latest sources (linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r6) I
ended up with no `fuse' module.
Far as I know I've been getting a fuse module when using `genkernal'
on previous kernels.
What is proceedure for adding that module now?
I never used genkernel, but if you
I have a failing disk drive which has a fuse-encfs filesystem. I am
copying data off the drive before it completely croaks, and a few of
the encrypted files have errors. I also have a full backup, so I
don't expect to lose much if anything, but I wonder if there is some
way to get fuse-encfs
a general rule in /etc/sudoers
and
add everybody to the group 'wheel' which I'd like to avoid.
I'm using
kernel 3.5.3
openssh 6.1_p1
sshfs-fuse (GIT version 2012/09/13)
fuse 2.9.1-r1
I can't use fuse from GIT since it breaks many packages on my machine.
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
of the 100s of FUSE modules do?
Yes, it's enough to simply emerge the packages, and modprobe zfs (and
later add zfs to /etc/conf.d/modules). Works fine here.
(Not sure what FUSE has to do with it, though. FUSE filesystems don't
install any kernel modules.)
Just ignore the section Installing
for every distro and any project that depends
on their work.
As I've pointed out before:
- system-critical is actually dependent on the system. A system dependent
on an smb share will find smbmount system critical. One dependent on
zfs-fuse will find fuse system critical. With the advent of fuse
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 04:11:06PM +1100, Adam Carter wrote
They were working just before the re-install/upgrade from 32-bits
to 64-bits. Any ideas? Could it be a kernel setting that I didn't
set on the new kernel?
Yes:
grep -i fuse /usr/src/linux/.config
CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m
You
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:27:23 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
>
>>> Looking at the github readme, it wold appear that exfat-progs is for
>>> use with the new in-kernel exfat fs, while exfat-utils is a companion
>>> to the older FUSE implement
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:27:23 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > Looking at the github readme, it wold appear that exfat-progs is for
> > use with the new in-kernel exfat fs, while exfat-utils is a companion
> > to the older FUSE implementation of exfat.
>
> Maybe I n
for the many replies, which offer as many different methods.
> I'll try them out & report back.
>
> One further important question : do I need to enable Fuse in the kernel ?
All of the mtp implementations I've tried were user-space filesystems,
so for those you will need Fuse enabled
Thanks for all the advice offered recently.
The simple method which works is
(1) enable 'fuse-fs' in kernel ;
(2) re-merge Kio-extras with USE="mtp" ;
(3) wake phone, plug in USB connection at both ends ;
(4) on phone, tap 'allow' to access data ;
(5) on Gentoo, Dol
.
(Or should I be using the fuse NTFS driver?)
Yes, most definitely.
By the way: Which one is better (or are they the same?): ntfs-3g or
ntfsprogs with USE=fuse?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Neil, back on 15 July, you stated that you used ntfs-3g with only the
in-kernel fuse modules.
When I try that, I get the following error:
error while loading shared libraries: libfuse.so.2: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
I find I have to use sys-fs/fuse to be able
at the moment) - at any one time 1/2 to 1 terrabyte
is unused, but mostly in scattered chunks. Some space is exported via
NFS and samba for backups and shared files.
maybe ZFS?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS
But not on Linux as a kernel module sadly
There's a FUSE implementation which
-2.6.20-gentoo-r6) I
ended up with no `fuse' module.
Far as I know I've been getting a fuse module when using `genkernal'
on previous kernels.
What is proceedure for adding that module now?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
b.n. wrote:
I am looking for the python bindings to FUSE, since I want to write a
little thing taking advantage of it.
Unfortunately in the portage tree I can only find bindings for ruby and
perl, but not for python. It could be the moment to learn ruby or perl,
but it would be another
On 22 Dec 2009, at 15:36, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
... I have no serious experience with ZFS, it kind of turns me back
the fact that
it's a FUSE based fs, though it's certainly possible to use it even
for a
root system provided that your kernel can load the module at
bootup ...
ZFS
On 2010-06-23, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say I have DVD playing software that can only play unencrypted
DVDs (either as ISO images or as mounted trees), and I want to use it
to play an encrypted DVD.
Is there any sort of FUSE+libdvdread+libdvddecss utility that can
On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Any idea how I can get the mount command to recognise exfat? It
works as root but not via fstab for users.
bunyip ~ # mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'
bunyip ~ # mount.exfat /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
FUSE exfat
'exfat'
bunyip ~ # mount.exfat /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
FUSE exfat 0.9.8
bunyip ~ #
BillK
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=30t=85873
Never used exfat myself, but I think you should include exfat-fuse in
fstab
HTH
Francesco
Ah, I was using exfat!
Seems like all
and recovering
non-essential partitions.
The beef with the comment on /home being nonessential is besides the
point, /usr, /var, or /opt could have been some special case FUSE
filesystem, making it still impossible to predict which files _should_
be in /. The more relevant matter here is that plan FHS
elieve me, as an amateur sparky it's NOT! They
> sell special points - often with a switch - to take a feed off a ring,
> and they all have a - mandatory - 16Amp fuse. Or they might take a
> standard 13Amp fuse.
I've never seen anything like that, but then I've been retired for 29
ye
On 3/20/21 9:52 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Looking at the github readme, it wold appear that exfat-progs is for
use with the new in-kernel exfat fs, while exfat-utils is a companion
to the older FUSE implementation of exfat.
Maybe I need more caffeine, but I can't see the /direct/ relationship
On Monday 04 February 2008, b.n. wrote:
On my wild dreams, once I thought to write a Python-based FUSE
filesystem abstracting Portage.
I'm confused by this. Portage is already a filesystem, why would you
want to abstract a filesystem as a filesystem...? I can't see the point
--
Alan McKinnon
Quoting Mike Mazur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What can I do to be able to mount an arbitrary ISO image to an
arbitrary mount point from the command line as non-root user?
fuse-iso ?
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet
I thought I remembered someway to compile a single module after the
fact that didn't involve recompiling everthing... but just now I
entered the usr/src/linux directory and edited .config adding the
sshfs FUSE module.
when I ran `make' I see it grinding thru the whole thing again
important backups :(
and the fuse-stuff is not experimental?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 7 May 2008 15:39:03 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Disadvantage: An experimental filesystem is not the best place to keep
important backups :(
and the fuse-stuff is not experimental?
Yes it is, which is why I decided not to use it after reading the web
sites.
--
Neil
On 10/4/07, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using ntfs-3g w/o issues. I'm not using in-kernel fuse modules
though. I'm compiling it from the version in portage
Same here, and it works OK so far.
--
Regards,
Liviu
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hello Iain Buchanan,
hey, stop answering, this was to Neil!
Hey! ! was asleep! :)
As Alexander has already posted, you still need sys-fs/fuse to provide
the libraries, but it defers to the kernel for the modules (which saves
rebuilding it each time you change the kernel).
--
Neil Bothwick
Hi all,
I have fuse for mounting iso files without root privilege. I' ve also
seen cdemu, but I was wondering if is there any other software (or
solution appart from sudo) for mounting iso files without root
privilege...
any idea will be appreciate.
Cheers!
--
Arnau Bria
http
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 18:59:42 schrieb Eric Martin:
IIRC, there is a fuse filesystem in portage that does exactly that. I
don't have any experience with it but it warrants a look.
Wow, indeed! sys-fs/mp3fs.
Bye...
Dirk
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:06:49 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
IIRC, there is a fuse filesystem in portage that does exactly that. I
don't have any experience with it but it warrants a look.
Wow, indeed! sys-fs/mp3fs.
Nice,anything similar for Ogg Vorbis?
--
Neil Bothwick
30 minutes
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 18:59:42 schrieb Eric Martin:
IIRC, there is a fuse filesystem in portage that does exactly that. I
don't have any experience with it but it warrants a look.
Wow, indeed! sys-fs/mp3fs.
Bye...
Dirk
I'm thinking
is
supported under Linux. I manage my Creative Zen with Amarok using MTP,
and there is even a (flaky) mtpfs FUSE layer.
Is that an iRiver problem?
m.
-emerge fuse
lsmod | grep --quiet fuse || FEATURES=-distcc -buildpkg emerge --oneshot
sys-fs/fuse modprobe -v fuse
#Re-emerge wlan-ng
if [ ! -f /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/linux-wlan-ng/prism2_usb.ko ] ; then
if rc-status -nc | grep -q net\.eth0.*started ethtool eth0 | grep -q
'Link detected
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you install FUSE and SSHFS, you can use any file browser - or even
the command line, using the normal commands (ls, cp,...)
--
Hilsen Harald.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Dienstag 22 Dezember 2009 20:01:16 schrieb Stroller:
ZFS shouldn't be considered a FUSE-based filesystem. It should be
considered a Solaris filesystem, which is yet to be (??) adequately
ported to any other platforms.
It just left experimental state in FreeBSD 8.0.
Bye...
Dirk
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 00:43 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
I need a little coaching on qmerge usage.
qmerge is an argument to ebuild:
ebuild file.ebuild compile install qmerge
documented in man ebuild
BillK
--
William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au
Home in Perth!
William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au writes:
[...]
qmerge is an argument to ebuild:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk writes:
[...]
Actually, you don't need all of this as ebuild will perform all
uncompleted previous stages, so you only need
ebuild unpack
edit file
ebuild qmerge
On Tue, 25 May 2010 19:58:40 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
- Encfs to encrypt partitions AND to be able to burn the encoded
stuff on DVD and mount and use the DVD instead of the partition.
Use ecryptfs, it's in the kernel instead of using FUSE.
--
Neil Bothwick
Did you know
Anyone using this ebuild?
I'd love to hear some feedback as the development on zfs-fuse.net goes
on. I think they could need some more testers as they have a new beta
out these days.
Have a look ;-)
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291540
Stefan
My modules file contains;
modules=vmmon vmnet vmblock vmci vsock
modules_2_6=${modules_2_6} acpi-cpufreq
module_acpi_cpufreq_args_2_6=
modules_2_6=${modules_2_6} fuse
module_fuse_args_2_6=
modules_2_6=${modules_2_6} usbhid
module_usbhid_args_2_6=quirks=0x05ac:0x1294:0x04
But the vm modules
sudo umount /numa-sv
and
sudo fusermount -u /numa-sv
do work, but then I'd have to generate a general rule in /etc/sudoers and
add everybody to the group 'wheel' which I'd like to avoid.
I'm using
kernel 3.5.3
openssh 6.1_p1
sshfs-fuse (GIT version 2012/09/13)
fuse 2.9.1-r1
I
Any idea how I can get the mount command to recognise exfat? It works
as root but not via fstab for users.
bunyip ~ # mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'
bunyip ~ # mount.exfat /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
FUSE exfat 0.9.8
bunyip ~ #
BillK
) yet.
Maybe there are some and I don't get it ;-)
I had one problem, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd 204,
the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all.
But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not
be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw
/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not
be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw-- root:root
Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not
exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on
gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root?
My
instead of /bin or /sbin.
They've created a mess for every distro and any project that depends
on their work.
As I've pointed out before:
- system-critical is actually dependent on the system. A system dependent
on an smb share will find smbmount system critical. One dependent on
zfs-fuse
Hi,
Is it possible to mount an NFS share from XFCE4? I suspect the answer
might have something to do with gvfs or fuse, neither of which I know
anything about.
Ideally after emerging or USEing I will have a Connect to server entry in
my XFCE4 menu.
If this is impossible, then I'd be ok
On 12/30/2020 02:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I just installed x2goserver-4.1.0.2 (fuse sqlite -postgres) and I'm
> getting an error trying to connect to the server:
I've missed the find print:
x2godbadmin --createdb
while exfat-utils is a companion
> >>> to the older FUSE implementation of exfat.
> >>
> >> Maybe I need more caffeine, but I can't see the /direct/ relationship
> >> between /user/ /space/ utilities and /kernel/ /space/ support for the
> >> same file system.
&
he drive on Linux box (it
>>> has support for NTFS enabled) I get an error:
>>
>> Please define what you mean by "it has support for NTFS enabled".
>>
>> Are you running a v5.15 kernel with the new in-tree NTFS driver?
>>
>> Are you using the ntfs3g
] gnome-base/gnome-mime-data-2.4.2 -debug 829 kB
[ebuild N] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.10.1 -debug -doc -static 1,326 kB
[ebuild N] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.10.1-r2 -debug -doc -gnutls -hal -howl
-ipv6 -samba +ssl 1,860 kB
[ebuild N] sys-fs/ntfsprogs-1.11.2 -debug -fuse -gnome
a password...
aaahhh, Linux!
--
Iain Buchanan iain at netspace dot net dot au
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by
blowing first.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
is built and running.
Using `genkernel all' on latest sources (linux-2.6.20-gentoo-r6) I
ended up with no `fuse' module.
Far as I know I've been getting a fuse module when using `genkernal'
on previous kernels.
What is proceedure for adding that module now?
genkernel --menuconfig all
You can
that which is Linux based would be great for
them but I cannot yet find anythign in the Online Package Database.
Probably I'm just not searching with the right terms yet. Sorry.
Thanks,
Mark
Setup FUSE and you should be able to 'mount' ssh using sys-fs/sshfs-fuse. Then
use whatever file browser
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Where do we list modules we want loaded at boot?
When I run modprobe fuse
WARNING: Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf, all config files
belong into /etc/modprobe.d/.
/etc/modprobe.conf doesn't
1 - 100 of 681 matches
Mail list logo
