Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and mm have
2.6.24 available in
portage
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 09:25:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Strange, I just resynced:
>
> # eix gentoo-sources
> [?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Available versions:
--->8
> (4.4.6) 4.4.6^bs{tbz2}
> (4.4.19) ~4.4.19^bs
> (4.7.2) ~4.7.2^bs
Same here today
Gah, must b tired to miss that - first place I looked :(
tkx
billk
- Original message -
How can I find out what vanilla version gentoo-sources was built
against?
specifically 2.6.38-gentoo-r6 (i.e., is it 2.6.37.6) as I want to pull
the correct patches from the tuxonice git
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 13:47, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I am trying to find the ebuild and files for
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.18.20 but as its no longer in the tree I
> checked the attic but it looks like it is only cvs and no longer in use
> for git.
>
> I couldnt f
Am 08.10.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
> were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
I never really understood what difference the gentoo-pat
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>
>> Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
>> were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
>> the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
> I n
Hi,
I am trying to find the ebuild and files for
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.18.20 but as its no longer in the tree I
checked the attic but it looks like it is only cvs and no longer in use
for git.
I couldnt find gentoo sources in the server linked to from the cvs
attic
.22-r9.
-mw
git-sources most likely. Also, gentoo-sources has .23 if your using
~arch.
--
Ken69267
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options so if
you
configure it with make oldconfig it *should* be the same as using gentoo-
sources.
Actually no, gentoo-sources aren't vanilla kernel while
Hi,
There is
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/sync/gentoo.git/tree/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/gentoo-sources-4.18.20.ebuild?id=966dc9c8c004d79b02cb0250ecef65974164f295
on the git, I didn’t checked if it’s the last one.
--
Alarig
Hi,
does anybody know about patches for the ATI-drivers 12.3 to work with
git-sources 3.4_rc3 ?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
I am new to ebuild writing. And I want to write a ebuild with the
sources from github. If there is a 'git' protocal support in SRC_URI or
other method?
Best wishes
---
mgcyung
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 09:30:27 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 09:25:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Strange, I just resynced:
> >
> > # eix gentoo-sources
> > [?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> >
> > Available versions:
&g
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:16:08 AM Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options so if
you
configure it with make oldconfig it *should* be the same as using gentoo
--- Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and mm have
2.6.24
Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and mm have 2.6.24 available in
portage. Looking forward
Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and mm have 2.6.24 available in
portage. Looking
-to-ram process.)
I had a look at the kernel-2 eclass and my head started to hurt... Do I
need to wade into the weeds or is there a short-cut I can take to go back
to the earliest gentoo-sources 3.18 kernel build :-)
You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options so
was this? It looks like gentoo-sources just tracks the
stable kernel, and so does vanilla-sources. If you want mainline you
need git-sources, assuming you aren't just pulling them from git
yourself (an option you of-course have with vanilla too).
The config items in the gentoo-sources are really
, to
a vanilla kernel, to get a gentoo-sources kernel.
On 31 March 2015 at 00:16, Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s-...@laposte.net
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options so
if you
configure
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 10:12:59 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of gentoo-sources
> have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the server chain? I get the
> same with UK and US sync servers.
Strange,
On 2022-09-23 10:28+0200 "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a specific reason why the keywords (apart from hppa) have
> been removed from gentoo-sources-5.15.59?
>
> I am seeing some issues with systems running this version, but not
> all. And as this i
On 12/14/2015 04:38 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> If the sources are in regular old git, the main changes are to replace
> SRC_URI with EGIT_REPO_URI and to inherit git-2. Here's one of mine I
> slapped together:
git-2 is deprecated in favor of git-r3. Don't ask me about the n
t; were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> > > the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
> >
> > Do you bother with the gentoo patches?
>
> I seem to recall the list having a discussion about gentoo-sources vs.
> vanilla-sources a while ago, a
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
> > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> > the
to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> > > the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
> >
> > Do you bother with the gentoo patches?
>
> I seem to recall the list having a discussion about gentoo-sources vs.
> vanilla-sources a while ago, and I believ
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> Do you bother with the gentoo patches?
Only the Kconfig patch that gives quick access to gentoo required configs
is really useful, the rest I would call minor. If you copy your config
from gentoo-sources to the gi
dn't really matter (and I
> don't think they'd touch this part of the code anyway). Personally I'd
> make the patches against the vanilla sources.
That's just what I'm doing, for these reasons. I'm not even sure Gentoo
maintains a git repository with all the gentoo-sources realeases.
>
?
- Grant
Regards, Kalden.
I think it's net-wireless/rt2x00 with rt73usb flag
Yeah I can't get that to compile even on vanilla-sources-2.6.24-rc7.
The developer says it uses a newer version of some wireless stuff that
is in git-sources. Are you using vanilla-sources and it compiles
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 1:57 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> I too stick to stable sources, partly for the reason you give, partly to
> avoid excessive reboots and partly because some systems use ZFS.
>
> % cat /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/kernel
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sou
do this when it's possible to reboot the machine.
Of course.
That's the reason why I don't care kernel source upgrades via package manager
on any system. Only when it's possible to reboot the machine, I update the
kernel sources via git (much faster than installing a complete package), build
Am 26.07.2012 00:15, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.07.2012 23:59, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Make sure sys-apps/kmod is installed.
It is and was.
my fault ...
I compiled modules for 3.5.0-gentoo, forgot about updating
GRUB2-config, and booted 3.5.0 (from git-sources), which lacked
but I've found mixed results when looking for its Linux
compatibility. There seems to be a driver but it is not included into
the vanilla sources. There are also bug reports like [2].
On the other hand, there have been commits which indicate support for
some sub types (but not the E type) through
On Freitag, 4. Januar 2008, Grant wrote:
Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and mm have 2.6.24
was merged into mainline kernel from 4.2 onwards.
you can try it by emerging git-sources-4.2_rc3, you should then find it
under:
- Device Drivers
- Network device support
- Wireless LAN
- Mediatek Wireless LAN support
- MediaTek MT7601U
:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [15-07-25 15:12]:
Which apparently was merged into mainline kernel from 4.2 onwards.
you can try it by emerging git-sources-4.2_rc3, you should then find it
under:
- Device Drivers
- Network device support
- Wireless LAN
entoo
>
> Not yet:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597624
>
> You're probably going to want to update to 4.4.26. It has been
> released, though it doesn't look like it is packaged in Gentoo yet.
> I've been running upstream's git for a while (currently on 4.4.26).
4.4.26
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote:
> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources,
as been
>> released, though it doesn't look like it is packaged in Gentoo yet.
>> I've been running upstream's git for a while (currently on 4.4.26).
>>
>> --
>> Rich
>>
> Would a Gentoo .config work with the upstream "vanilla" 4.4.26 kernel?
>
Thanks,
I'm not very savvy when it comes to working with the kernel beyond
using the normal stable cut gentoo provides. I'll research git-bisect
and see if I can't figure this out though.
I think you are correct though. It does seem to only happen while the system
is under heavy I/O.
I've never
features from a version that wasn't yet on portage.
How long ago was this? It looks like gentoo-sources just tracks the
stable kernel, and so does vanilla-sources. If you want mainline you
need git-sources, assuming you aren't just pulling them from git
yourself (an option you of-course have
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Alan Warren bluemoonsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a proper venu for debugging such matters, or should I just wait for
this kernel to go prime-time?
Can you reliably reproduce the problem? If so, and you have a kernel
that works git-bisect should allow you
bisect it; I need to
grab the sources from Git manually and install it outside of portage
(and that's bad.)
I guess it might be a good idea for the next GSoC?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 05:33:37PM -0700, walt wrote
I have no idea why you guys are having the same problem with older
kernels, except maybe some useflag has changed recently. Are all
of you running ~amd64, maybe?
BTW, I pull directly from kernel.org, I don't use
sys-kernel/git-sources
, another issue (bug-report ;-) ).
For the kernel I use vanilla-sources unstable; I haven't used
gentoo-sources in ages (long before systemd), and I never used
tuxonice-sources.
I see. gentoo-sources here, 3.7.6 at the moment, from time to time I
git pull some kernel from linux-git or linux-stable
ouldn't hurt to wipe your sources and re-download them
instead of just running make mrproper (which won't fix modifications
made to source files). If you're using git sources you could just do
a hard git reset, which would fix any files in the repo.
I'll comment on your later reply...
--
Rich
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
Some people, such as myself, use kernel sources outside of portage (I
follow a git repo) and do so as a non-root user. In this case the
kernel tree is not owned by root and the config/compile is easily done
as a non-root user.
If you are super-paranoid
nicolas.s-...@laposte.net
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options
so if you
configure it with make oldconfig it *should* be the same as using
gentoo-
sources.
Actually no, gentoo
That article you linked to is about a variant of linux, "rt". And as it
looks they didn't update their branch since the release of 4.19.100-r41.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/log/?h=v4.19-rt
linux is at 4.19.102 now...
AFAIR the Gentoo kernel
Con Kolivas's kernel
http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/
or
emerge ck-sources
use Kolivas' toolsched (http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/toolsched/) so that
background jobs only run when no other task wants to run. toolsched uses
sys-process/schedtool
Hi,
when I use a - type ebuild which accesses the source from a GIT
repository this is stored under /usr/portage/distfiles/git-src/$PN
where $PN is the package name.
But one cannot look at the source files since these are in compressed
form.
How can I setup a directory
Very likely a FAQ but I can't find it right now:
wanted to try linux 3.2.0-rc7 (by emerging git-sources) ... used my old
config and it built OK.
It also boots OK but very soon it gets simply black, no console, no xdm.
I am able to ssh into it, can't find anything obvious.
framebuffer stuff
Am 29.12.2011 16:32, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Very likely a FAQ but I can't find it right now:
wanted to try linux 3.2.0-rc7 (by emerging git-sources) ... used my old
config and it built OK.
It also boots OK but very soon it gets simply black, no console, no xdm.
I am able to ssh
Hi,
probably since I've emerged openssh-6.0_p1 and/or git-sources-3.4_rc? I
have problems with ssh.
scp as well as filezilla as well as rsync -e 'ssh' stall when
transmitting a somewhat larger file.
This might be as few as 500 Kb on a slow network (256 Kbit/s).
But it occurs on a fast
My wife and I have identical Dell XPS 13 laptops. I have the config
on both as close as possible. We use identical kernel config files,
but I can compile git-sources-3.9-rc1 without installing sys-devel/bc
and it looks like she can not. Does anyone know why this would
happen?
BC kernel
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:47 AM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find the ebuild and files for
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.18.20 but as its no longer in the tree I
> checked the attic but it looks like it is only cvs and no longer in use
> for git.
>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:19, Franz Fellner wrote:
>
> That article you linked to is about a variant of linux, "rt". And as it looks
> they didn't update their branch since the release of 4.19.100-r41.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-
ly I'd
make the patches against the vanilla sources.
-Marco
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
g/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?
h=linux-6.1.y=ed9b87010aa84c157096f98c322491e9af8e8f07
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Mitigate-Zenbleed
=>
https://lock.cmpxchg8b.com/zenbleed.html
Regards,
Peter
to be extremely common on
AM3 boards but I've found mixed results when looking for its Linux
compatibility. There seems to be a driver but it is not included into
the vanilla sources. There are also bug reports like [2].
On the other hand, there have been commits which indicate support for
some sub types
s.
> >>
> >> Current kernel versions are posted at https://kernel.org/
> > How can I tell which ones are long term support?
>
> They say longterm next to them. :)
>
> Stable ones will have releases for a few months typically.
>
> Gentoo-sources keywording
ely just wipe out
/usr/src/linux and unpack clean kernel sources. If you're using the
gentoo-sources package you can just rm -rf the symlink and the actual
tree, and just re-emerge the package and it will set up both. If
you're using git then I'd probably wipe it and re-pull as I'm not sure
if a clean
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
First, I appreciate your thoughts and comments.
>
> I suspect your sources have gotten messed up in some way. I've run
> into issues like this when I do something like build a kernel with an
> odd umask s
ference. Will have to take a look at following
> your example..
>
> >
> > In theory that isn't essential, but I would definitely just wipe out
> > /usr/src/linux and unpack clean kernel sources. If you're using the
> > gentoo-sources package you can just rm -rf th
o is getting it's source for Grub...
>
You can find this info by looking in the relevant ebuilds. Gentoo is
getting it's grub source from the official GNU grub repository: http://git.
savannah.gnu.org/r/grub.git
<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub.git>
> Apparently the git version of
-ati- for example. When I
update it and there's a bug, I can't really bisect it; I need to grab the
sources from Git manually and install it outside of portage (and that's
bad.)
I guess it might be a good idea for the next GSoC?
That would actually be quite cool actually - to be able
On Saturday, 25 September 2021 09:06:20 CEST the...@sys-concept.com
wrote:
> Any idea where I can find "Master PDF Editor - version 4" ebuild?
> Ver. 4 is without watermark.
You can find it in the git repository history:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:39:39 +0300, Dex Conner wrote:
> > Setting EVCS_OFFLINE=1 should work. There's some documentation on
> > that variable here:
> > https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-reference/git-r3.eclass/index.html
> >
> > -Marco
>
> Th
'lspci').
A very casual Google suggests
that this card uses the the atl1e kernel driver / module. EG:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy-lum.git;a=commit;h=949e7063204f568027fa7783c8562ceb32b95a25
says: Add support Atheros ... AR8132 ethernet NICs
CONFIG_ATL1E is the wossisname
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
My wife and I have identical Dell XPS 13 laptops. I have the config
on both as close as possible. We use identical kernel config files,
but I can compile git-sources-3.9-rc1 without installing sys-devel/bc
and it looks like
b.io/wiki/VulnerabilityDetails
>> >
>> > Are we patched? I'm running 4.4.21-gentoo
>>
>> Not yet:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597624
>>
>> You're probably going to want to update to 4.4.26. It has been
>> released, though it doesn't loo
I know that the
diff will nearly always apply because they are just two branches of the
same git tree.
The other reason is the extra kconfig options in the gentoo sources,
which are on by default and I don't want any of them. I don't remember
anymore but I _think_ at some point it wouldn't let me tur
imes longterm vanilla already
> includes the fixes from mainline, and when it does not, I know that the
> diff will nearly always apply because they are just two branches of the
> same git tree.
>
> The other reason is the extra kconfig options in the gentoo sources,
> which are on
(is in the
linux backend anyway), and remove the pm-utils dependency.
Yep, another issue (bug-report ;-) ).
For the kernel I use vanilla-sources unstable; I haven't used
gentoo-sources in ages (long before systemd), and I never used
tuxonice-sources.
I see. gentoo-sources here, 3.7.6
I have been burned by the odd regression.
>
> Thanks for the other info (snipped). All Vanilla-sources are testing,
> which seems to correspond to your "upstream" kernels.
I use them directly from upstream:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Bob Wya bob.mt.wya at gmail.com writes:
I had a look at the kernel-2 eclass and my head started to hurt... Do
I need to wade into the weeds or is there a short-cut I can take to
go back to the earliest gentoo-sources 3.18 kernel build
Might this help [1] ?
I always keep at least 6 older
e ASAP. If anyone knows how I could submit such a request, I'm
all ears.
Thanks for your attention!
--
Regards,
Yuri K. Shatroff
That's interesting. That was certainly not my experience running vanilla 4.5.1.
Although I compiled the kernel sources I had previously downloaded
from the kernel.org
mask the given packages just does not help – it keeps telling
me about eapi versions not matching.
Searching the internet did not give any hints other than such not working.
Any idea?
I've tried:
emerge --sync
emerge -qav python
emerge -qav sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
emerge -qav sys-kernel/git-sourc
mask the given packages just does not help – it keeps telling
me about eapi versions not matching.
Searching the internet did not give any hints other than such not working.
Any idea?
I've tried:
emerge --sync
emerge -qav python
emerge -qav sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
emerge -qav sys-kernel/git-sourc
on 01/20/2011 06:15 PM Mark Knecht wrote the following:
Hi,
I'm interested in how I would go about getting the xf86-video-ati
package from git? I would like to try the newest driver, if possible,
as it is apparently the reason I don't have 3d rendering enabled on my
HD5750 Evergreen card
them.
I don't know about git, but I have a Sapphire HD5770 1GB, using
x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.9, x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.3.901, with
2.6.37-gentoo sources (~amd64 and no-multilib) without problems.
...and forgot to say x11-drivers/ati-drivers-10.12 (Driver fglrx)
Well, this is really a temporary workaround for people who like to
run the latest git kernel from Linus, and it's only tested for
nvidia-drivers-302.17-r1, and only on ~amd_64.
diff -ur NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-302.17.orig/kernel/conftest.sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-302.17/kernel/conftest.sh
--- NVIDIA
://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git-commits-headm=115273802320119w=2
is the actual commit, with a fair bit of detail about it. You could pull
the 1-line patch from there and apply it to your kernel. There's also
the workaround mentioned in the SANS message if you don't feel
comfortable with patching
On 12/29/2011 04:32 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Very likely a FAQ but I can't find it right now:
wanted to try linux 3.2.0-rc7 (by emerging git-sources) ... used my old
config and it built OK.
It also boots OK but very soon it gets simply black, no console, no xdm.
I am able to ssh
On 05/08/12 09:09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 08 May 2012 09:04:59 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
probably since I've emerged openssh-6.0_p1 and/or git-sources-3.4_rc?
I have problems with ssh.
scp as well as filezilla as well as rsync -e 'ssh' stall when
transmitting a somewhat larger file
to
standard mode, didn't help ...)
Could it be related to the kernel?
Earlier today I compiled git-sources-3.5.0-rc2 and booted once.
This is ~amd64, my former kernel is 3.4.0, gcc-4.7.0
Additional issue: even with fallback-mode, metacity does not get started.
Wanna see my .xsession-errors ?
-
http
Hello all,
I'm trying to emerge app-text/fbreader, but I found there's a bug
that not solved about glib.h not fount.
Somebody gave a solution about it, but I don't like to modify the
ebuild files.Then I get the source form
/usr/portage/distfiles/fbreader-sources-0.12.10.tgz, and make
1-gentoo
> >
>
> Not yet:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597624
>
> You're probably going to want to update to 4.4.26. It has been
> released, though it doesn't look like it is packaged in Gentoo yet.
> I've been running upstream's git for a while (current
but it looks like it is only cvs and no longer in use
>> for git.
>>
>> I couldnt find gentoo sources in the server linked to from the cvs
>> attic. Is there an equivalent to the attic for git, or a stanza to
>> retrieve it?
> If you have a git checkout, then chdir
try to pull the git repo
manually?
- Nick
As I wrote in my original post I receive somehow similar error when I
try to install the package using emerge.
I am not sure whether it can be some permissions problem, the git-src
subdirectory is successfully created in the distfiles directory
Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby wrote:
Tim wrote:
So, I need a recent gentoo kernel (some 2.6.22 but I dont know which
exactly). I really want to use only ebuilds.
Xen-sources doesn't go as high as .22 yet in the portage tree. The
newest one is .20, but that should be okay for most people
many of you like to test bleeding edge kernels but
I thought I'd ask. I have some seriously ugly hacks for building the
nvidia (and very recently) the ati proprietary drivers against git
kernels, but I won't spend time explaining them here if no one is
interested.
Tried git-sources-3.4-rc3 on my
kernels,
except maybe some useflag has changed recently. Are all of you running
~amd64, maybe?
BTW, I pull directly from kernel.org, I don't use sys-kernel/git-sources,
so my git kernels are not affected by any useflags, FWIW.
Thanks guys.
-sources, and how they
are patched, and what the mm.h and the gup.c in question (there are a
few of so named files in various directories) look in the
hardened-sources, and how they look in the vanilla-sources...
If I'm not mistaken, and I did check it. No, I'm not mistaken, you just
sent me
this to hardened ML.
>
> You can't just run the patch for a vanilla kernel onto a
> grsecurity-patched kernel. Look up the hardened-sources, and how they
> are patched, and what the mm.h and the gup.c in question (there are a
> few of so named files in various directories) look in the
&
the same problem.
Crap, I just noticed that virtualbox-modules-4.2.8 won't compile
against
the latest 3.8.x kernels :
virtualbox-modules-4.2.8 builds just fine with gentoo-sources-3.8.1
here
Helmut.
Good. Most days I'm running the latest kernel from Linus's git
repository
instead
s?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Look for - ebuilds in the tree using the git-r3 eclass, and copy
> >> what they do. It's not fancy but something like
> >>
> >> $ find ./ -
clone(s)!
> >
> > Regards!
> >
>
> Could you be a bit more concise? I'm not sure what exactly you're asking
> about. A simple question or two might be enough to better explain your
> problem.
It doesn't look easy to me to do it.
With palemoon Gentoo overlay cloned, and Pal
>> sudo make help
>>
>> or just grep:
>>
>> grep -q 'firmware_install' /usr/src/linux/Makefile
>>
>>
>> References:
>> - [1]
>> - [2]
>
> You are quite right, there is no firmware_install in the 4.14.7 release. What
&g
t; Look for - ebuilds in the tree using the git-r3 eclass, and copy
>> what they do. It's not fancy but something like
>>
>> $ find ./ -name '*-.ebuild' | xargs grep -l 'git-r3'
>>
>> in PORTDIR should turn up a bunch of examples.
>
> OK, I will take a lo
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
