On 2011-10-18, YoYo Siska y...@gl.ksp.sk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:19:32PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
And the lack of eth1:1 is presumably explained if the system is using
the iproute2 module instead of the ifconfig module. My current theory
is that iproute2 is getting used because
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:37:35 +
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
Hi there,
Could I possibly draw on the combined wisdom of the list to explain
to me the difference between net-tools iproute2, please?
I'd quote wikipedia article, since it really explains what iproute2
On 2011-10-18, YoYo Siska y...@gl.ksp.sk wrote:
From /usr/share/doc/openrc-0.7.0/net.example:
##
# INTERFACE HANDLERS
#
# We provide two interface handlers presently: ifconfig and iproute2.
# You need one
Hi there,
Could I possibly draw on the combined wisdom of the list to explain to
me the difference between net-tools iproute2, please?
I have always used ifconfig for checking a computer's IP addresses.
And, less frequently (since one normally sets such parameters in /etc/
conf.d/net
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out the way to set both IPv4 and IPv6 default gateway in
the /etc/conf.d/net file.
I've seen this way [1], adding iproute2 module, but when I execute:
# insmod iproute2
insmod: can't read 'iproute2': No such file or directory
so I guess it's not in my kernel and I
hi
what is the difference in general between these - ifconfig and iproute2?
i used old style /etc/conf.d/net and it worked well until system last update i
run - net was gone. made new style /etc/conf.d/net but ifconfig version
refused to work, lucky i got windoze on other drive to get iproute2
I'm curious: what are the allowable characters for routing tables aliases in
/etc/iproute2/rt_tables ?
Rgds,
eth1
4: eth2: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 00:18:e7:08:20:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
And the lack of eth1:1 is presumably explained if the system is using
the iproute2 module instead of the ifconfig module. My current theory
Miroslav Rovis <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> writes:
> How is this done with the bridge utility from iproute2 package is not very
> clear to a non-expert. It sure is all completely different than with brctl.
ip link set master br0 dev eth0
in the output of 'ip link' and 'ip addr
On 161016-03:05+, Erik Mackdanz wrote:
> Miroslav Rovis <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> writes:
...
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Iproute2#iproute2_for_net-tools_swappers
> >
> > -- also notice that bridge in not in the swappers there --
> I just added 'i
/rcscripts/net. In particular, /lib/rcscripts/net/iproute2.sh
and /lib/rcscripts/net/ifconfig.sh define all the various *_up(),
*_down(), *_add_address(), etc. functions that are invoked by net.lo.
/etc/conf.d/net.example holds examples for just
about every imaginable configuration, but from my
Joseph wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Rebuilding openvpn worked; thank you.
As far as I have seen, you can set USE=iproute2 for OpenVPN which
seems to use iproute2 instead of net-tools - should avoid your problem,
too.
-Matt
Matthias Hanft wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Rebuilding openvpn worked; thank you.
As far as I have seen, you can set USE=iproute2 for OpenVPN which
seems to use iproute2 instead of net-tools - should avoid your problem,
too.
If iprout2 is relocated, it will fail for openvpn
Hi!
The:
/usr/share/doc/netifrc-0.4.0/net.example.bz2
from the net-misc/netifrc package reads:
# Bridging (802.1d)
# For bridging support emerge net-misc/bridge-utils
# To add ports to bridge br0
#bridge_br0="eth0 eth1"
...
et cetera
...
How is this done with the bridge utility fro
On 16 October 2016 at 08:10, Miroslav Rovis
<miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> wrote:
> On 161016-03:05+, Erik Mackdanz wrote:
>> Miroslav Rovis <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> writes:
> ...
>> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Iproute2#iproute2_for_net-tools_
.
If I install iproute2, on gentoo, does it replace ifconfig, or are both
still usable to configure interfaces?
emerge -pv iproute2 shows no package conflict, so I assume both can
coexist peacefully?
From:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Iproute2
It says:
Most network configuration manuals still
iproute2 is newer and while it takes over all of the abilities of
ifconfig, it is modularized and designed for controlling advanced
router features as well as basic interface related stuff.
The capabilities of it are vastly superior to ifconfig, and sometimes the notation is simpler.
Setup eth0
handlers presently: ifconfig and iproute2.
# You need one of these to do any kind of network configuration.
# For ifconfig support, emerge sys-apps/net-tools
# For iproute2 support, emerge sys-apps/iproute2
# If you don't specify an interface then we prefer iproute2 if it's installed
# To prefer
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:43:35PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote
> Unmerge it anyway and then rebuild iproute2. It seems like an automagic
> dep. It should not be using db when the berkdb USE flag is not set.
> Since it does, it's a bug.
>
> However, rebuilding it after unme
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:18:05 +0100
Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know exactly how initscripts work, but I suppose that if
the /24 is given in /etc/conf.d/net, then both the resulting iproute2
and ifconfig command that bring the interface up will include the
netmask
that if
the /24 is given in /etc/conf.d/net, then both the resulting iproute2
and ifconfig command that bring the interface up will include the
netmask specification.
How the net init script works (there's really only one, generally net.*
is linked to net.lo for update simplicity
.
*starting lo.
/lib/rcscripts/net.modules.d/iproute2.sh does not exist
ERROR:Problem starting needed service net.lo
netmount was not started.
Is there anybody know what is matter?
--
wcw
This should help:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery belongs iproute2
[ Searching
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Cahn Roger rc...@club-internet.fr wrote:
Bureau cahn # ip link show dev eth0
bash: ip : commande introuvable
It is in package sys-apps/iproute2
On Mon 15 August 2011 13:34:06 Jorge Polinotto did opine thusly:
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out the way to set both IPv4 and IPv6 default
gateway in the /etc/conf.d/net file.
I've seen this way [1], adding iproute2 module, but when I
execute:
# insmod iproute2
insmod: can't read
emerge -av iproute2
Then in /etc/conf.d/net make sure that the routes_eth0 setting has 2
(*two*) lines like the forum thread you posted, first line is the IPv4
route and second line th IPv6 route.
Rgds
On 2011-08-15, Jorge Polinotto jo...@ccc.uba.ar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to find out
Hi all!
Thanks Pandu for your help.
Executing:
# emerge iproute2
and in /etc/conf.d/net:
routes_eth0=( default via A.B.C.D
default via AA:BB:CC:DD::1)
it works!
Regards!
Jorge.-
On Friday 20 April 2012 11:11:08 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
Which package is it in?
sys-apps/iproute2
Of course. I should have thought of that - thanks.
--
Rgds
Peter
This can be solved by rebuilding the
* packages that pulled them in.
*
* sys-libs/db-5.3.28-r2 pulled in by:
* sys-apps/iproute2-4.14.1-r1 needs libdb-5.3.so
*
>>> Adding lib providers to graph...
=====
1) I've rebuilt ip
* packages will not be removed. This can be solved by rebuilding the
* packages that pulled them in.
*
* sys-libs/db-5.3.28-r2 pulled in by:
* sys-apps/iproute2-4.14.1-r1 needs libdb-5.3.so
*
Adding lib providers to graph...
==
elsewhere. The hard (and
module-dependent) work is done by the files located
in /lib/rcscripts/net. In particular, /lib/rcscripts/net/iproute2.sh
and /lib/rcscripts/net/ifconfig.sh define all the various *_up(),
*_down(), *_add_address(), etc. functions that are invoked by net.lo.
interesting
Zbynek Houska wrote:
my /etc/conf.d/net contains following:
config_eth0=( 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
192.168.0.255 )
routes_eth0=(
default via 192.168.0.1
Have you upgraded baselayout recently?
Did you do etc-update afterwards?
Do you have iproute2 installed?
If you
I decided to switch to iproute2 and it went fine, until I removed
net-tools. At that point, I got errors about /bin/hostname being
missing. I did a quick search and found
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-443540-start-0.html where the dev
says baselayout 1.12 doesn't *need* the hostname
Erik Mackdanz <stasib...@gentoo.org> writes:
>> How is this done with the bridge utility from iproute2 package is not very
>> clear to a non-expert. It sure is all completely different than with brctl.
> ip link set master br0 dev eth0
Sorry, that's half the story. To c
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:27:56PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
But if I include the line...
modules=!iproute2
...it works perfectly. What's frustrating is that it works under
ifconfig, but not under iproute2. I'll check with the local linux
user group in town (mailing list) to see if I
via 192.168.123.254 metric 0
169.254.0.0/16 via 169.254.1.1 metric 0
Note that the redundant route is to allow my PC to talk to other
machines on my little LAN when using a dialup connection as emergency
backup.
* It worked under ifconfig before iproute2 showed up
* It stopped working when
On Sunday 01 Mar 2015 03:22:03 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:27:56PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
But if I include the line...
modules=!iproute2
...it works perfectly. What's frustrating is that it works under
ifconfig, but not under iproute2. I'll check
wrote:
>> >> Miroslav Rovis <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> writes:
>> > ...
>> >> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Iproute2#iproute2_for_net-tools_swappers
>> >> >
>> >> > -- also notice that bridge in not in the swappers there
On 161016-09:33+0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 16 October 2016 at 08:10, Miroslav Rovis
> <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> wrote:
> > On 161016-03:05+, Erik Mackdanz wrote:
> >> Miroslav Rovis <miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr> writes:
> > ...
>
this are the use-cases for
networkd.
what i don't understand is if you look at how openRC does it, it only
really cares about up/down events and the /etc/conf.d/net is very
comprehensive, in part because it passes everything to iproute2 to handle,
the only thing i can't do without an additional
On 1/28/21 7:09 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I think that's probably right. I had never used the 'ip route'
command like that and was unaware that route existed.
*nod*
iproute2 has supplanted the venerable net-tools (or whatever it's
called); ifconfig, route, netstat, etc.
I sort of put
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem emerge-ing sys-apps/iproute2-2.6.37
From: Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
Date: 2011-06-11 17:15
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:34:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Nevermind. It's Bug 370793
( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370793
Let's forget about additional routes with different metrics, and try
to get the simplest case working, and move forward from there. If I have
/etc/conf.d/net as...
modules=( !iproute2 )
config_eth0=
192.168.123.251/29 broadcast 192.168.123.255
169.254.1.1/16 broadcast 169.254.255.255
Hi, Erik!
On 161016-03:13+, Erik Mackdanz wrote:
> Erik Mackdanz <stasib...@gentoo.org> writes:
>
> >> How is this done with the bridge utility from iproute2 package is not very
> >> clear to a non-expert. It sure is all completely different than with brctl.
as been updated, ot will soon be updated as well,
> > with tips for users who need lots of kind documentation like me ;-) !
This below is brand new, freshly created!
> Noted, added[1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/gentoo/netifrc/pull/23
>
> > I just looked it up, but it may be my
this working succesfully?
You do not need to use aliases. Using iproute2, you can have as many
(within reason) IP addresses as you want on each interface. You
configure it as
conf_eth0=( 1.2.3.4/24 10.11.12.13/24 20.21.22.23/24 )
For routing via the different networks use iproute2 rules, see the
postup
...
All I need to work out now is how to get my iproute2 config for my new
tunnel to come up automatically... it works from the command line.
Are there any documents about migrating explicit iproute2 routing done
at the command line (i,e, calling ip cmd ... several times after
logging in as root
...
All I need to work out now is how to get my iproute2 config for my new
tunnel to come up automatically... it works from the command line.
Are there any documents about migrating explicit iproute2 routing done
at the command line (i,e, calling ip cmd ... several times after
logging in as root
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:25, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Anyone got a problem doing `emerge sys-apps/iproute2-2.6.37`?
Mine died after the following series of warnings and errors:
8 -- [serious_snip] -- 8
m_xt.c:167: error: too few arguments to function
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:34:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Nevermind. It's Bug 370793
( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370793 )
The patch on that bug fixed the problem for me, just drop it
into /etc/portage/patches/sys-apps/iproute2.
--
Neil Bothwick
Most problems go away if you just
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:40:00 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
The patch on that bug fixed the problem for me, just drop it
into /etc/portage/patches/sys-apps/iproute2.
Eh? You can do that??
Oh yes, at least with portage 2.2.
That's news to me... all this time I dropped patches into /usr
On Sun, 1 March 2015, at 3:22 am, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
* My only option in an iproute2-only environment would be to get a 2nd
NIC and attach the TV tuner to it.
* My HDHomerun tuner is almost a museum-piece (spring of 2010). I
figure that by the time ifconfig
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 05:59:26PM -0500, Tom H wrote
169.254 isn't supposed to be routable so the router might be set up
not to route it out to the world.
You'd be better off setting up a 192.168 address on the tuner, if possible.
But if I include the line...
modules=!iproute2
tunnel help` show gretap as an option.
Other facts:
- iproute2-3.19.0 with USE=berkdb iptables ipv6 -atm -minimal (-selinux)
- gentoo-sources 4.0.5
- every GRE kernel option enabled (except IPV6)
Thanks in advance.
--
Erik Mackdanz
Does everyone else also see low-level console output (looks like it may
be from iproute2) when openrc runs dhcpcd? I see that
/etc/init.d/dhcpcd already has a line
command_args=-q
so trying to stuff it somewhere won't help. I know this is superficial
and all, but I'd prefer not to see those
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:01:51 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Does everyone else also see low-level console output (looks like it may
> be from iproute2) when openrc runs dhcpcd? I see that
> /etc/init.d/dhcpcd already has a line
>
> command_args=-q
>
> so trying to stuff it
Le 15/06/2011 16:52, Paul Hartman a écrit :
It is in package sys-apps/iproute2
Yes and I haven't it emerged.
But I can't do it because...I have no connection to internet!
Thanks Paul for helping me
Roger
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 22:32, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Why do you want to unmerge net-tools, anyway?
'equery depends' shows that nothing needs it, and why keep an entire
package around when I have another package installed that does what
the first package is supposed to do? ;)
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Thursday 19 April 2012 20:56:59 Michael Mol wrote:
The 'ip' command is far and away a nicer tool than ifconfig, once you
get a handle on it.
Which package is it in?
sys-apps/iproute2
Wonko
no idea why the routes_MySSID=... line doesn't have any effect.
Helmut.
Just guessing, could it be related to iproute2?
From net.example:
# If you don't specify an interface then we prefer iproute2 if it's
# installed. To prefer ifconfig over iproute2
modules=!iproute2
signature.asc
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400
Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command.
I'd recommend installing and becoming familiar with the iproute2
package. I personally find the tools it delivers to be more intuitive
than the older tools, and I *think
I've openvpn installed:
Installed versions: 2.3.6(11:44:47 PM 01/30/2015)(lzo pam plugins ssl -down-root -examples -iproute2 -passwordsave -pkcs11 -polarssl -selinux -static -systemd
USERLAND=-BSD)
amd I'm trying to generate server key but I don't have directory:
/usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa
Erik Mackdanz erikm...@gmail.com writes:
# ip tunnel add foo mode gretap remote 10.54.0.6 local 10.54.0.4 ttl 255
Unknown tunnel mode gretap
Never mind, ip tunnel is for gre but ip link is for gretap. I
should paste more and re-use previous commands less :-)
--
Erik Mackdanz
Assigning files to packages...
>> * In order to avoid breakage of link level dependencies, one or more
>> * packages will not be removed. This can be solved by rebuilding the
>> * packages that pulled them in.
>> *
>> * sys-libs/db-5.3.28-r2 pulled in by:
I'll have to check into iproute2. Seems interesting...won't be able to
try until tonight (after I get home), but will certainly share the
results.
Thanks,
Ben.
--- Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done this sort of thing before, but never with one interface
running dhcp. You definitely
I've done this sort of thing before, but never with one interface
running dhcp. You definitely want to emerge iproute2 (which gives you
the ip command), and add your interfaces to /etc/iproute2/rt_tables, for
example (though in this case, 10 eth0 won't actually get used):
10 eth0
11 eth1
12
On Saturday 15 October 2005 18:48, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
iproute2 is newer and while it takes over all of the abilities of ifconfig,
it is modularized and designed for controlling advanced router features as
well as basic interface related stuff.
The capabilities of it are vastly
On 12/13/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 December 2006 17:38, Felipe Ribeiro wrote:
i tried this, but still doesn't work
modules=(ifconfig)
Why do you insist on ifconfig? /etc/conf.d/net.example clearly indicates
that iproute2 is the default - for good reason.
config_eth0
do etc-update afterwards?
Do you have iproute2 installed?
well, I omited to add that system was undergoing emerge -uD system, so I
figured out that culprit was me by not updating config files using
etc-update.
If you did all above, then change /etc/conf.d/net
to following:
modules
upG).
I then went through the file and found that it appears iproute2 is now
preferred although there are no man pages or docs and it got installed
on my system.
I came to the same conclusions, which means that I now have to get to
grips with using iproute2 after many years of using
:
Error: either local is duplicate, or netmask is garbage
until I changed the syntax from
config_eth0=XX.YY.ZZ.WW broadcast XX.YY.ZZ.255 netmask 255.255.255.0
to
config_eth0=XX.YY.ZZ.WW/24
The other syntax worked in baselayout1.
That error message comes from iproute2, so
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:31 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
That error message comes from iproute2, so it looks like you hit this
bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366905
In a nutshell we are trying to convert ifconfig syntax to iproute2
syntax, but we do not do
(Sorry for top posting)
baselayout 1.12 don't need net-tools, but other packages might need net-tools.
Why do you want to unmerge net-tools, anyway?
Rgds,
On 2011-09-01, Doug Hunley doug.hun...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided to switch to iproute2 and it went fine, until I removed
net-tools
On 04/19/12 16:40, Alex Schuster wrote:
Thanks, that's a nice one. But can I expect this command to be available
per default on typical Linux distributions? Some other systems I have
access to have it, but here on Gentoo it belongs to sys-apps/iproute2,
which depends on nothing I have
On Monday 02 Mar 2015 00:33:11 Stroller wrote:
On Sun, 1 March 2015, at 3:22 am, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
* My only option in an iproute2-only environment would be to get a 2nd
NIC and attach the TV tuner to it.
* My HDHomerun tuner is almost a museum-piece (spring
ges.
>
> For example, to read the help page of 'ip address':
>
> ip address help
>
> the corresponding man page is:
>
> man ip-address
Yes, I've explored what's installed with iproute2, and no, Andrew, I'm not
using systemd - thanks anyway.
I want to control routing,
On 2018-08-22 10:12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Does everyone else also see low-level console output (looks like it
> > may be from iproute2) when openrc runs dhcpcd?
>
> Do you have rc_verbose set in either /etc/rc.conf or /etc/conf.d?
No:
matica!18 ~$ fgrep verbose /etc/r
On Monday 03 March 2008, Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
However, it's using iptables, which I thought was deprecated,
Not to my
Hi all,
Since my last system update, i have many errors when i try to start
net.eth0 service.
The errors are :
ipppd doest not support the required function provides
iproute2 doest not support the required function provides
macnet doest not support the required function check_installed
pump
/rcscripts/net.modules.d/iproute2.sh does not exist
ERROR:Problem starting needed service net.lo
netmount was not started.
Is there anybody know what is matter?
--
wcw
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
wu chuanwen wrote:
/lib/rcscripts/net.modules.d/iproute2.sh does not exist
ERROR:Problem starting needed service net.lo
netmount was not started.
Is there anybody know what is matter?
Your initscripts got corrupted. I got a similar corruption on my firewall a
few
Brian Davis wrote:
The minimal USE flag might be nice to have.
Apparently the official position on that one is that it should be used
(pardon the pun ;)) only in /etc/portage/package.use. I know that in my
case, having it turned on globally caused Shorewall not to work
(requires iproute2
Hello list!
I've made a rudimentary system to do a simultaneous backup/restore of:
+ ipset
+ iptables
+ iproute2 RPDB routing tables
At: https://github.com/pepoluan/WallMator
Feedback is definitely welcome!
Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com
=!iproute2 to get the route to add properly, but it is
working now using openrc.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
cov...@ccs.covici.com
package is it in?
/sbin/tc in sys-apps/iproute2
found by e-file tc
/usr/bin/e-file in app-portage/pfl
--
Regards
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
you can install app-crypt/easyrsa
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I've openvpn installed:
Installed versions: 2.3.6(11:44:47 PM 01/30/2015)(lzo pam plugins ssl
-down-root -examples -iproute2 -passwordsave -pkcs11 -polarssl -selinux
-static -systemd USERLAND
On 02/09/15 11:42, Joseph wrote:
I've openvpn installed:
Installed versions: 2.3.6(11:44:47 PM 01/30/2015)(lzo pam plugins ssl
-down-root -examples -iproute2 -passwordsave -pkcs11 -polarssl -selinux -static
-systemd
USERLAND=-BSD)
amd I'm trying to generate server key but I don't have
with iproute2? The net.example file says
# If you need more than one address, you can use something like this
# NOTE: ifconfig creates an aliased device for each extra IPv4 address
# (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc)
# iproute2 does not do this as there is no need to
# WARNING: You cannot mix multiple
On 2017-09-02 22:01, Mick wrote:
> ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
Ah, that's where the "via" comes from. I didn't realize when I wrote my
OP that iproute2 would be used by default, and not the old route program
from net-tools.
Thanks.
--
Please don't Cc:
On 06/10/2018 12:22 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
Is it possible to have a VPN clent set up in one of these namespaces
and route certain traffic through it from the main stack?
I see no reason why it couldn't.
It may be entertaining to start and stop the VPN client.
I'll respond later with more
Hello list,
I'm trying to learn how to use the "ip" command to manage routing on one of my
boxes, which has two Ethernet interfaces.
Can anyone recommend suitable reading material? I don't mind paying for a
book, provided that it's reasonably up to date and won't bury me in a morass
of bit
On 2021-01-29, Grant Taylor wrote:
> iproute2 has supplanted the venerable net-tools (or whatever it's
> called); ifconfig, route, netstat, etc.
My brain knows that. My fingers only partially so.
> I sort of put pressure on my self to start using them 20 years ago,
> and la
, and the reason /etc/mtab is a link to
/proc/self/mounts. You need /var and some other stuff RW, if you want
permanent logs and stuff, though.
[snip]
can you please clarify what you mean by absorbing iproute2?
I don't use iproute2, so I don't know how big or complex it is; but if
it's small and simple
possible with the provided tools) compared to OpenRC.
Notice that iproute2 is the default everywhere for long time, here.
The OpenRC comprehensive configuration set for network management is
actually what I would expect in systemd.
Perhaps they are starting small? I don't know; from what I've read
on servers.
Seting up manual advanced setups on systemd looks crappy (if even
possible with the provided tools) compared to OpenRC.
Notice that iproute2 is the default everywhere for long time, here.
The OpenRC comprehensive configuration set for network management is
actually what I would
On Monday 23 Feb 2015 08:39:42 Walter Dnes wrote:
Looks like it's time to play around with the ip command and try to
duplicate my current setup. Does anyone have a multi-route setup
similar to mine configured with iproute2? The net.example file says
# If you need more than one address
output the way that I do when I
manually configure it. According TFM, eth1:1 should have been created
for the second address. What gives?
OK, I think I've figured it out. The startup system is using iproute2
instead of ifconfig. The manual says that ifconfig is the default,
and I don't see
link/ether 00:18:e7:08:20:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
And the lack of eth1:1 is presumably explained if the system is using
the iproute2 module instead of the ifconfig module. My current theory
is that iproute2 is getting used because I have openvpn installed with
the iproute2 use flag. [I'm
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
However, it's using iptables, which I thought was deprecated,
but there are iptables versions as recent at three months ago,
so
On 2008-03-03, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2008, Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
However, it's using iptables
below the error messages), and the Network Interfaces tab is empty.
Thoughts?
I see the same. Didn't even know this existed :-)
On Gentoo, network interfaces are configured in /etc/conf.d/net and can easily
be examined with the ip command (emerge iproute2).
HTH...
Dirk
signature.asc
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
