includes MOBIL, it is recognized as a tanker on MP. The property
'isTanker'
is not transmitted by default over the net and is not handled on
receipt. It
is set to 'false' for all mp aircraft, and is only set to true if the
callsign contains MOBIL is the first part
tanker = m.getNode(tanker).getBoolValue();
var id = m.getNode(id).getValue();
- print(mp ', id, ' contact=, contact, tanker=,
tanker);
+ #print(mp ', id, ' contact=, contact, tanker=,
tanker);
if (tanker
includes MOBIL, it is recognized as a tanker on MP. The property
'isTanker'
is not transmitted by default over the net and is not handled on
receipt. It
is set to 'false' for all mp aircraft, and is only set to true if the
callsign contains MOBIL is the first part
Le 28/08/2010 20:01, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
jean pellotier wrote:
currently we can only refuel by mp behing a MOBIL plane, with a plane
having the multiplay/tanker set.
here's a proposal that permit to use any callsign (yes i know in this
case the tanker will not have a tacan working
Hi,
AAR
is fun, if a little tricky. These screen shots were taken with an AI tanker.
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/KC135-KC135-1.jpg
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/KC135-cockpit.jpg
The KC135 is AAR
capable so a full fuel load
Hi,
TACAN has to search the new AI submode 'tanker'.
This tiny patch can be applied to both PLIB and OSG.
Thanks for committing,
Alexis
Index: tacan.cxx
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Instrumentation/tacan.cxx,v
jean pellotier
currently we can only refuel by mp behing a MOBIL plane, with a plane
having the multiplay/tanker set.
here's a proposal that permit to use any callsign (yes i know in this
case the tanker will not have a tacan working), and any plane, for
exemple the tanker pilot
Hi,
We have now completed and committed to CVS the next stage in development of
our AAR capability - user to user AAR over the Multiplayer(MP) Network. This
comprises:
Updated code in cvs AIModels
Updated carrier_nav.dat.gz file
A flyable tanker - the KC135
AA TACAN which can now detect MP
Hi,
currently we can only refuel by mp behing a MOBIL plane, with a plane
having the multiplay/tanker set.
here's a proposal that permit to use any callsign (yes i know in this
case the tanker will not have a tacan working), and any plane, for
exemple the tanker pilot can cut the probe
see that if a carrier exists, then _mobile_valid
get set TRUE, so you can't have a tanker also.
The attached patch is my attempted fix up. _mobile_valid gets set to false
only if no valid TACAN freq is selected. If a valid freq. is selected, then
carrier, AI Tanker and MP Tankers are checked
I was using the route manager while flying the tanker, everything was working fine until i opened the select an airport from the list box, then FG hang...I haven't tried to reproduce it yet.Julien
jean pellotier wrote:
currently we can only refuel by mp behing a MOBIL plane, with a plane
having the multiplay/tanker set.
here's a proposal that permit to use any callsign (yes i know in this
case the tanker will not have a tacan working), and any plane, for
exemple the tanker pilot
jean pellotier wrote
Le 28/08/2010 22:49, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
AFAIKS in the code an aircraft gets a TACAN if the callsign is MOBIL1
(060X), MOBIL2 (061X), or MOBIL3 (062X). On the other hand if the
callsign
includes MOBIL, it is recognized as a tanker on MP. The property
- AI Tanker enhancements to allow users to select from a range of
tanker models. This is particularly relevant for naval probe-equipped
aircraft, where there is a much greater variety of tanker types.
Could we also tighten the envelope in which we receive fuel? I did AAR with
the F-16
Hi All,
I've just committed some small changes to the AI air-to-air refueling function:
1) Added support for multiple tankers of each type, selectable through
the AI-Tankers GUI. Tankers are now defined in AI/tankers.xml.
2) Added an A-4F buddy tanker.
3) Enhanced the UI to allow the user
On lundi 16 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
While we are at it, here some comments on tanker.nas:
There's a menu entry AI/MP-Tanker, which opens a small dialog where
you can request a tanker. It'll contact you and tell you something
like this:
MOBIL3 at 15000, heading 130 with 250 knots
alex wrote:
- vary callsign TACAN id
- support more than just KC135 and KA6 tanker
- support helicopter refueling (i.e. configurable airspeed)
- fly refueling pattern(?)
- avoid collisions with mountains
m.
The Handley Page Victor K2 is not too far from completion. It already has
And here's the traditional interface change right after the
announcement: s/system/type/
Tanker:
/ai/models/tanker[*]/refuel/type[*] boom or probe
Aircraft:
systems
refuel
typeboom/type
!-- typeprobe/type --
/refuel
/systems
Sorry
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 16 March 2009:
+ vary callsign TACAN id
+ fly refueling pattern
That's now done. The tanker flies a refueling pattern with length
50 nm and 25 degree turns. You get a warning 1 nm before the turn.
Note that pilots also tank during the turn!
Bank angle and turn rate
buddy tanker.
3) Enhanced the UI to allow the user to set the speed of the tanker,
and the radius at which contact is made. Note that this is based on
the origin of tanker and user. As a future enhancement I want to add
offsets to indicate the position of the refuelling probe/receiver
which also documents the great new
additions - Air-Air TACAN (operable in MultiPlayer) a new tanker (KA6-D) and
an improved flyable version of the KC-135 tanker which can be used for
refuelling other aircraft in a MultiPlayer session!
Primarily this document refers to the latest CVS, but some
In the past it was possible to refuel any aircraft from any tanker.
That's no longer the case! Tankers do now have to declare which
system they offer. They do that by setting
/ai/models/tanker[*]/refuel/system[*] to boom or probe
A tanker can set both, but none of our current tankers does
On jeu 14 août 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
In the past it was possible to refuel any aircraft from any tanker.
That's no longer the case! Tankers do now have to declare which
system they offer. They do that by setting
/ai/models/tanker[*]/refuel/system[*] to boom or probe
A tanker can set
While we are at it, here some comments on tanker.nas:
There's a menu entry AI/MP-Tanker, which opens a small dialog where
you can request a tanker. It'll contact you and tell you something
like this:
MOBIL3 at 15000, heading 130 with 250 knots, TACAN 062X
At the moment TACAN is always 062X
* gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar
x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on
That tanker feature don't gives such information , it is missing ,
is it any valuable reason ?
That's
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar
x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on
That tanker feature don't gives such information
Le 28/08/2010 22:49, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
AFAIKS in the code an aircraft gets a TACAN if the callsign is MOBIL1
(060X), MOBIL2 (061X), or MOBIL3 (062X). On the other hand if the callsign
includes MOBIL, it is recognized as a tanker on MP. The property 'isTanker'
is not transmitted
that in now. :-)
Okay, I though that that might be the case. I've not been following that
discussion too closely,
That's a mistake. Chasing the Nasal tanker is a lot of fun. ;-)
and was assuming that the nasal tanker code would also
make use of the AIModels code, and hence be managed
local branches.
hi, not a fancy new feature, but could someone apply this diff to
tanker.nas?
it's to make the hud markers work whith the ai tanker, for those who
want to cheat a little :)
http://janodesbois.free.fr/fg_screens/2012/fgfs-screen-002.jpg
jano
diff --git a/Nasal/tanker.nas b/Nasal
On 3/12/07, Russell Suter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I found these videos to be quite disturbing not only in the choice
of chase plane but the tanker
flying wildly at tree top level with the boom out. Bet those boom
operators were virtually puking their guts
out on that one
* gerard robin -- Sunday 15 March 2009:
You should know that aircrafts which have some specific AAR won't
be able to use it.
All that work(ed) with the tanker scenarios should also work with
this. It doesn't do anything magic. Just offer a tanker and set
the aircraft's contact flag if it's
On dimanche 15 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Sunday 15 March 2009:
You should know that aircrafts which have some specific AAR won't
be able to use it.
All that work(ed) with the tanker scenarios should also work with
this. It doesn't do anything magic. Just offer
SNIP
- vary callsign TACAN id
- support more than just KC135 and KA6 tanker
- support helicopter refueling (i.e. configurable airspeed)
- fly refueling pattern(?)
- avoid collisions with mountains
m.
The Handley Page Victor K2 is not too far from completion. It already has
the ability
Le 10/04/2013 22:57, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
I've (finally) managed to add the code to allow offsets for the tanker
fuelling positions
and the receivers probe position. See the A-4F for an example of how
to set this.
One can now use small envelope sizes and use the relative drogue
Okay, now someone needs to refuel behind it. I understand the tanker is
firewalled, and the SR-71 is on the verge of stalling.
Bill
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE
hi,
with last update, i think that jsbsim is applying the wind correction in
opposite direction.
i tried to follow a tanker first with a F-4N, and it was the same with
the c172p, facing wind from environment, air speed was equal to ground
speed minus wind speed.
that was not the case last
Yup, if you are in a AAR-capable aircraft, click on AI-AITanker. Click
Request in the window displayed, and a tanker will be instantiated
nearby.
The controller will tell you where it is relative to your current
position.
Hope it still works! I haven't tested it for several years
(tanker) - the dial just seems to swing around in a circle
depending what direction I fly in.
It works best if the tanker you are trying to locate is actually equipped
with TACAN ;-)
Well, then the wiki refueling 'how-to' is wrong. But if I add in the TACAN
(ESSO1 and the TACAN-id
back then,
and a nice new feature. But it's simple and unrealistic and just
doesn't fit in our framework. A radar needs to be a regular
instrument -- and the wxradar is just that. Or it should be some
customized Nasal logic like in the f-14b. New AI objects like
the tanker shouldn't have
that I need to change.
tanker.nas puts the tanker there. It's also artificially (un)intelligent,
but the main reason for putting it there is that it should be picked
up by the air-refueling code and radar. And in general, an instrument
shouldn't get its info via secret channels from some
, if not impossible...
The tanker used is the 'victor', probe-drogue type, flown on
autopilot at 12000 feet (STD 29.92), 220 knots on either 180
from Paris LFPY, or 360 on the return. I usually turn N shortly
after Toulouse in the south...
So far, as the other aircraft, have had Citation-II, Mirage_F1,
m2000
for contact with tanker aircraft
var tankers = [];
if (ai_enabled) {
foreach (a; aimodelsN.getChildren(tanker)) {
var contact = a.getNode(refuel/contact,
1).getBoolValue();
var tanker = a.getNode(tanker, 1).getBoolValue
{
# check for contact with tanker aircraft
var tankers = [];
if (ai_enabled) {
foreach (a; aimodelsN.getChildren(tanker)) {
var contact = a.getNode(refuel/contact,
1).getBoolValue();
var tanker = a.getNode(tanker, 1
,
buildings aren't placed very well in cities.
- AI Tanker enhancements to allow users to select from a range of
tanker models. This is particularly relevant for naval probe-equipped
aircraft, where there is a much greater variety of tanker types.
Stuart, Thorsten, your respective goals sounds
On 4/6/07, Nick Warne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many people *actually* tested the TACAN and located the tanker aircraft
with it, rather than just sit in the cockpit and see the needle/gauges work?
I did, at least three times. But I used the refueling_demo_1.
Greets,
Csaba
alexis bory a écrit :
But AAR seem to be broken too... Yesterday first tests show that
contact don't behave has expected. I'll try to confirm this today.
The tests I've made this morning confirm that tanker contact doesn't
work anymore.
Cheers,
Alexis
On Thu 14 June 2007 20:59, Bill Galbraith wrote:
Okay, now someone needs to refuel behind it. I understand the tanker is
firewalled, and the SR-71 is on the verge of stalling.
Bill
Bill,
Yes, you just put the finger where the pain is the most important
--
Gérard
Message du 10/12/10 10:14
De : Vivian Meazza
A : 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] carrier questions
Hi Curt,
Yup, if you are in a AAR-capable aircraft, click on AI-AITanker. Click
Request in the window displayed, and a tanker
Request in the window displayed, and a tanker will be instantiated
nearby.
The controller will tell you where it is relative to your current
position.
Hope it still works! I haven't tested it for several years.
It definitely did a week ago (I actually use it quite often and think it's
(?) or less.
Someone in the forum made a Russian tanker - maybe we can include that as well?
* Thorsten
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free
On Friday 06 April 2007 14:00:14 AJ MacLeod wrote:
The tanker in refueling_demo doesn't have TACAN at all. In fact, I think
we have a bit of needless duplication with those demos, and one of them
could be removed without too much pain...
OK, Csaba found the bug I was seeing, and he fixed
the new AI submode 'tanker'.
This tiny patch can be applied to both PLIB and OSG.
Thanks for committing,
Alexis
This patch doesn't seem to work here. Has it actually been tested, or
perhaps I'm missing something?
Yes, I tested it: fgfs --aircraft=a4f --airport=KSFO
I needed
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow
AITanker.cxx
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:12, alexis bory wrote:
Hi,
TACAN has to search the new AI submode 'tanker'.
This tiny patch can be applied to both PLIB and OSG. Thanks for
committing,
Alexis
Two people in the forum offered to commit this tanker stuff.
Don't! The idea is great, but it's not in committable shape
yet!
- inacceptable dependency on scenarios (for no good reason)
- four dialogs only to ask for one tanker?
- badly laid out dialogs; no reasonable default values filled
/model/tanker[*]/refuel/contact.
This is the one and only property that MP or AI tankers use(d) to
indicate contact.
You could just try if it works for you.
m.
Then, if my understanding is right we don't need the /systems/refuel
property.
ONLY the /ai/model/tanker[*]/refuel/contact
* alex -- Friday 20 March 2009:
* * Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 16 March 2009:
- vary callsign TACAN id
That's done. (Even a bit overengineered. ;-)
- support more than just KC135 and KA6 tanker
- support helicopter refueling (i.e. configurable airspeed)
or generally:
- allow aircraft
Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2009, 12:30 +0200 schrieb Alexis Bory - xiii:
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
Hi, When trying to get the terrain elevation under a solid AI (like a
tanker) we only get the elevation of the AI, maybe that's because it
is solid... But it can be useful to get the real
Hi Curt,
Yup, if you are in a AAR-capable aircraft, click on AI-AITanker. Click
Request in the window displayed, and a tanker will be instantiated nearby.
The controller will tell you where it is relative to your current
position.
Hope it still works! I haven't tested it for several years
on all the menu items, which seemed
redundant given that all these menu items exist under the AI menu.
I've made the following changes:
AI Options - Traffic Options
AI Formation - Wingman Controls
AI Tanker - Tanker Controls
AI Carrier Options - Carrier Controls
AI Scenario Select - Scenario Select
2
I've (finally) managed to add the code to allow offsets for the tanker
fuelling positions
and the receivers probe position. See the A-4F for an example of how
to set this.
One can now use small envelope sizes and use the relative drogue and
probe position
to refuel.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:03
:
refueling_demo1
to:
lightning_demo
That is all you need do. Then start at KSFO, use TACAN to locate the tanker
(040X)... and fly in formation!
http://www.nick.ukfsn.org/fg/lightning/lightning_refuel3.jpg
Nick
?xml version=1.0?
PropertyList
scenario
description
The following scenario puts
to make this scalable.
- AI Tanker enhancements to allow users to select from a range of
tanker models. This is particularly relevant for naval probe-equipped
aircraft, where there is a much greater variety of tanker types.
Could we also tighten the envelope in which we receive fuel? I did AAR
NOTAM:
To flyers who fly 'probe' enabled aircraft in Europe... or
even if NOT...
I will be flying the 'victor' refueling tanker for the next
few days from KFPY, south 180 track, then turn around at the
southern mountains, north on 360, at 12,000 feet – FL120
STD QNA – and am interested in 'hot
the victor somewhere.
jano
NOTAM:
To flyers who fly 'probe' enabled aircraft in Europe... or
even if NOT...
I will be flying the 'victor' refueling tanker for the next
few days from KFPY, south 180 track, then turn around at the
southern mountains, north on 360, at 12,000 feet – FL120
STD
. New AI objects like
the tanker shouldn't have to generate absurd values to emulate
that obsolete radar. That would only prolong its lifetime. That's
inhuman. :-)
But you can easily generate shift-x/shift-y etc. for the radar
you are actually using. Your aircraft knows which radar
* Julien Pierru -- Saturday 20 May 2006 07:51:
I was using the route manager while flying the tanker, everything was
working fine until i opened the select an airport from the list box, then
FG hang...
Where's the bt?
Where's the indication that it was a crash, when you say it only hangs
There were some tanker chase videos that were pretty decent. I think they
were Curt's. I have them, if you'd like me to send them to you.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berndt,
Jon S
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:20 AM
To: flightgear-devel
I've had success harvesting the files of the tanker chase videos out of
my firefox cache directory. I just
cd into there and look for the largest files and do a type on them until
I find them. They show up as type
Macromedia Flash Video. I can play them using mplayer. The file
names
) for an
AI model. So it would be possible to spawn an AI tanker at a desired
location or be able to launch testbeds or rockets from a plane and
direct it to a desired location.
I am using an end feb build of osg/fg.
Maybe I missed something, thanks in advance,
markus
Durk
Sent: 14 June 2007 06:57
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow AITanker.cxx
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:12, alexis bory wrote:
Hi,
TACAN has to search the new AI submode 'tanker'.
This tiny patch can be applied
, the mechanism driving the contact property functionality is working
again. I've committed this to CVS/plib. Now, I need to try and fly close to
the tanker to see if I can get some fuel.
Cheers,
Durk
-
This SF.net email
.
That looks pretty ugly - we only need
typecarrier/type although it is a subset of AIShip.
Now (after the pull out of the tanker code) were pretty much in the same
situation, so removing classtanker/class is the next locical step when
everything works again as expected.
I observed that the refueling
isn't updating yet.
Okay, the mechanism driving the contact property functionality is
working again. I've committed this to CVS/plib. Now, I need to try
and fly close to the tanker to see if I can get some fuel.
Ok Durk, I just tested successfully AI refueling at KSFO with
refueling_demo.xml
explains that. Not good for our default airport
though.
Well, the disappearance is a bug, caused by a feature that is a little too
trigger happy right now.
I will also try and add a few more taxiways.
FWIW, I also hope to have a look at the tanker speeds this weekend.
Your proposed fix
. It will work just like before. It's $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/Generic/aar.nas
which checks whether an aircraft and a tanker fit together. It either
fills the tanks, or doesn't. So, if the Blackbird doesn't even use aar.nas,
then there's nobody making any decision which could affect it. There are
only a few new
If that is . right
= allow aar-equipped aircraft to request a tanker everywhere without
scenario ==
You should know that aircrafts which have some specific AAR won't be able to
use it.
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la
* gerard robin -- Sunday 15 March 2009:
= make sure /systems/refuel/ exists =
Since a specific AAR could use any other specific property
This should have been systems/refuel, without the leading
slash. It's the tanker's property /ai/model/tanker[*]/refuel/contact.
This is the one and only
hi,
with last update, i think that jsbsim is applying the wind correction
in
opposite direction.
i tried to follow a tanker first with a F-4N, and it was the same with
the c172p, facing wind from environment, air speed was equal to ground
speed minus wind speed.
that was not the case
relative to the original
aircraft ... can the secondary aircraft be animated with absolute
angles relative to the world coordinate frame?
Hi, you can have a look in tanker.nas, where the tanker move using direcly his
lat, lon, alt, and differents inclinaisons with no relative reference
Hi,
On Sunday 17 May 2009 05:36:25 Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
When trying to get the terrain elevation under a solid AI (like a
tanker) we only get the elevation of the AI, maybe that's because it is
solid...
But it can be useful to get the real terrain elevation, for instance if
we want
Hi John
I have never tried to impliment ramp activity but I think it is done by
using the scenario code like was used for the tanker that used to fly
in a circle over KSFO.
I maybe wrong and people who know may chip in.
Cheers
Innis
Thanks Innis,
Think that answers my earlier question
back into its
patrol area, and once there to resume its patrol.
Hi Vivian,
Is there an easy / automated way to put a refueling tanker over the Vinson
so I could go up and top off if I wanted to?
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson:
http://www.atiak.com - http://aem.umn.edu/~uav/
http://www.flightgear.org
I've been updating The Manual for the upcoming release, including
updating the command reference to include the changes to the menus.
Looks good to me Stuart! But I do wonder why people feel the need to capitilise
each single word.
Why isn't it Traffic options, or Tanker controls? I know
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Looks good to me Stuart! But I do wonder why people feel the need to
capitilise each single word.
Why isn't it Traffic options, or Tanker controls? I know it's not a big
deal, but to me it looks
cleaner and clearer...
As Jacob pointed out
..., closeup bumpmapping, grain overlay,...)
That gives all in all 8 possible rendering frameworks, out of which currently
1a), 2b) and 3a) exist. I was talking about creating 4b) (or maybe 4a) ) - you
seem to have something else in mind (?)
- AI Tanker enhancements to allow users to select
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:24 PM, jean wrote:
one more bug (was my mistake ):
in tanker .nas, we need to normalise the degre in line 26O-261 to have:
me.hOffsetN.setDoubleValue(view.normdeg(me.bearing -
ac_hdg));
me.vOffsetN.setDoubleValue(view.normdeg
Nick Warne wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 14:00:14 AJ MacLeod wrote:
The tanker in refueling_demo doesn't have TACAN at all. In fact, I
think we have a bit of needless duplication with those
demos, and one
of them could be removed without too much pain...
OK, Csaba found the bug
On mar 26 août 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I intend to merge Generic/aar.nas with Nasal/fuel.nas (which are almost
the same already), and to offer a simple interface for special needs.
The detection of a tanker (not necessarily a flying one) is a generic
job, and so is refueling. The part
TACAN idents?
Why limit the MP to only one tanker ident?
It is actually a limit of 9, MOBIL1-9. I could have used a
*local* configuration file (or property) there, but this
is just a
temporary solution - I expect tacan information to come
through MP
protocol. Then this code
, good luck with giving out the Bordeaux!
Theo
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Geoff McLane ubu...@geoffair.info wrote:
NOTAM:
To flyers who fly 'probe' enabled aircraft in Europe... or
even if NOT...
I will be flying the 'victor' refueling tanker for the next
few days from KFPY, south
Jon,
I've had success harvesting the files of the tanker chase videos out of
my firefox cache directory. I just
cd into there and look for the largest files and do a type on them until
I find them. They show up as type
Macromedia Flash Video. I can play them using mplayer. The file
names
building placement. While it looks OK for towns,
buildings aren't placed very well in cities.
- AI Tanker enhancements to allow users to select from a range of
tanker models. This is particularly relevant for naval probe-equipped
aircraft, where there is a much greater variety of tanker types
On Friday 06 April 2007 23:10:25 Vivian Meazza wrote:
Nick Warne wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 14:00:14 AJ MacLeod wrote:
The tanker in refueling_demo doesn't have TACAN at all. In fact, I
think we have a bit of needless duplication with those
demos, and one
of them could
update_loop = func {
# check for contact with tanker aircraft
var tankers = [];
if (ai_enabled) {
- var ac = aimodelsN.getChildren(aircraft);
+ var ac = aimodelsN.getChildren(tanker);
var mp = aimodelsN.getChildren(multiplayer
you are within 250 ft of the tanker, a green light will come on in the fuel
contents gauge, and fuel transfer will take place. When you have taken
enough fuel, you can break off. If you also have nimitz_demo.xml in your
preference file, you cab retune your TACAN to the Nimitz channel (029Y
On Saturday 20 May 2006 06:51, Julien Pierru wrote:
I was using the route manager while flying the tanker, everything was
working fine until i opened the select an airport from the list box, then
FG hang...
I haven't tried to reproduce it yet.
This was happening here yesterday morning
)
..the problem with jokes this deep, is they require a bit much of your
tolerance on politics, they ask you to _have_viewed_ Curt's last 3
movies, and, they ask you to _have_spotted_ the tanker boom on the big
bird zig-zagging, and to _have_spotted_ the red stars on the MIG 15
flying chase
done!)
A Victor tanker would be great. Maybe a special FG with Port Stanley for
the Black Buck anniversary?
Thanks very much for the feedback.
-Stuart
___
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
On 3/12/07, Bill Galbraith wrote:
There were some tanker chase videos that were pretty decent. I think they
were Curt's. I have them, if you'd like me to send them to you.
Here are a few that I posted to youtube (apologies to those people running
systems that youtube doesn't support.)
http
-devel] FlightGear presentation
On 3/12/07, Bill Galbraith wrote:
There were some tanker chase videos that were pretty decent. I think
they were Curt's. I have them, if you'd like me to send them to you.
Here are a few that I posted to youtube (apologies to those people running
systems
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
