On 2013-11-15 5:18 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, the question is, what the heck is thin-provisioning in lvm2, am I
using it, and if not, do I need it?
I'm pretty sure I'm not using it, but how to be sure?
If you use thin
On 2013-11-15 3:01 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow these steps:
0. undo whatever you did
Already did...
1. emerge --sync
2. echo =sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 ~amd64
/etc/portage/package.keywords
3. update your system
Or, I could just echo sys
2013/11/15 Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com
Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by an
update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2.
It looks like ruby is only required for the tests of
sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools [1].
The new ebuild thin
Hello,
Has anybody found an amd64 (turion) mobo
that they are happy with? I have one in a
a portable and it's performance is outstanding
and it consumes a mere 35 watts.
I'm looking for a thin client or atx form factor
mobo.
Suggestions are most welcome.
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
> noticed a thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I don't have
> > anything thin and I don't provision anything so why I ask?
> >
> > From what I've been able to understand, it's something to do
> > with Device Mapper, snapshots and "many virtual de
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org wrote:
2013/11/15 Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com
mailto:adamcart...@gmail.com
Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by
an update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2.
It looks like
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-11-15 3:01 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow these steps:
0. undo whatever you did
Already did...
1. emerge --sync
2. echo =sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 ~amd64
/etc/portage/package.keywords
3
On Friday, 15 September 2017 23:30:07 BST Daniel Campbell wrote:
> If you have app-portage/gentoolkit (I highly recommend it) you can run
> `equery d sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools` to find what's pulling it
> in. It's probably lvm2, which is expected if you use LVM for anything.
On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 01:56:54 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three
> versions of Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I
> noticed a thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I don't have
> any
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:39 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Some months ago I found myself wondering why I had ruby on this box at all. A
little poking around revealed that the only thing that needed it was thin-
provisioning. Once I'd added
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:11:32 +0200, misteryel...@vmail.me wrote:
Whenever I continue and reach the point to install genkernel with
cryptsetup flags to generate the ramdisk with LUKS modules in it, it
prompts me to install thin-provisioning-tools , but the compile fails
for some reason
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:39:29 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Some months ago I found myself wondering why I had ruby on this box
at all. A little poking around revealed that the only thing that
needed it was thin- provisioning. Once I'd added -thin to my USE
flags and recompiled lvm2
Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
> OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
> patronising garbage, namely "A suite of tools for thin provisioning o
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, so... is there or is there not a way to prevent ruby from being
installed?
Yes
I've tried adding -ruby and -test to package.mask for
thin-provisioning-tools, and even tried adding them to USE= in make.conf
Simon Thelen <gentoo-u...@c-14.de> wrote:
> I sync from git and none of my Manifests track the ebuilds, so this
> could be a thing.
No. git has (probably, I didn't check)
thin-manifests = true
in its metadata/layout.conf, but for rsync this should
not be the case for security reaso
the network. Start simple. Just get a handful of similar NICs and you
should be set.
There's also the option of pre-made hardware thin clients that
typically boot from internal flash and simply provide a remote
interface to a central server (though most are geared towards RDP or
Citrix), and some
On 2013-11-15 5:18 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, the question is, what the heck is thin-provisioning in lvm2, am I
using it, and if not, do I need it?
I'm pretty sure I'm not using it, but how to be sure?
Google for thin
be set.
There's also the option of pre-made hardware thin clients that
typically boot from internal flash and simply provide a remote
interface to a central server (though most are geared towards RDP or
Citrix), and some are even WiFi capable.
A pre-made thin client could be the way to go
On Friday 27 June 2014 21:58:23 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:39:29 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Some months ago I found myself wondering why I had ruby on this box
at all. A little poking around revealed that the only thing that
needed it was thin- provisioning
On 15/09/2017 23:43, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
>>> OK, let's t
> >
> > > OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
> > > patronising garbage, namely "A suite of tools for thin provisioning on
> > > Linux" - well, duh! Who write's this stuff?
> > >
> > > So, WTF is thin prov
and they are wanting to
setup thin clients in all the class rooms for the teachers. There is an
existing thin client setup there now but the clients tend to hang on a
regular basis. I suspect it is due to NFS because at times you get the
connection error message until it resumes the connection
You could say that:
$ grep -ir -C1 ruby /etc/portage
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin
volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use: # which needs ruby. I do not want
ruby.
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- sys-fs/lvm2
/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin
volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use: # which needs ruby. I do not want
ruby.
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- sys-fs/lvm2 -thin
But the real reason I don't have ruby is I don't have a use for it
I
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin
volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use: # which needs ruby. I do not want
ruby.
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- sys-fs/lvm2 -thin
But the real reason I don't have ruby is I
on this box at all. A
little poking around revealed that the only thing that needed it was thin-
provisioning. Once I'd added -thin to my USE flags and recompiled lvm2 I
could
get rid of ruby altogether.
This won't suit everybody, I know, but maybe it's worth considering.
What exactly does this do
Hi all,
I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three versions of
Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I noticed a
thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I don't have anything thin and
I don't provision anything so why I ask?
From what
On 12 January 2006 01:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:56 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Uwe
(who is good for throwing these Chinese solid state thin clients, I
have got yesterday, out of the [wW]indows)
I hope you are referring to computer hardware and not undernourished
Hi there,
it´s my first time writing to a mailinglist, so excuse me if this email
doesn´t have the correct format ...
I´d like to create my own thin client - like Gentoo. After booting, it
should just have a few processes running, like logging, Xserver, getty, ...
Well, it´s not the problem
Chris Stankevitz schrieb am 15.11.2013 16:29:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't
Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote:
> Simon Thelen <gentoo-u...@c-14.de> wrote:
> > I sync from git and none of my Manifests track the ebuilds, so this
> > could be a thing.
>
> No. git has (probably, I didn't check)
> thin-manifests = true
> in
On 09/15/2017 02:43 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
>>> OK, let's t
On Thursday 12 January 2006 05:14, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Thiem to write:
It's hardware, alright. And I could just confirm with the manufacturers
that there, indeed, were two bugs in those thin clients.
some penicillin should take care of that
--
Regards, Ernie
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
What would you guys suggest in terms of specs for a server, serving
say 50 odd thin clients?
--
When you say I wrote a program that crashed Windows, people just
stare at you blankly and say Hey, I got those with the system, for
free. - Linus Torvalds, 1995
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing
Uwe Thiem uwix at iway.na writes:
That isn't really a thin client but a small computer. TCs usually are
diskless.
I gather you want to use it for streaming video?
Yep,
and router (frame relay) as well).
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
...
So, in this case, is it still recommended/fully supported/safe?
Thanks
Honestly, I don't see how LVM can interact with VMware's VMDK... unless one
use VMware's thin provisioning over a SAN Storage Thin Provisioning, in
which case all hell will break loose once the actual disk size
with tk and threads).
I've never had Ruby installed before, and after some digging around, I
finally tracked it down to two things:
gnome-terminal-nautilus-webkit-ruby
multipath-tools-thin-provisioning-tools-ruby
These both seem to be new dependancies.
After uninstalling gnome-terminal
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> > Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
> > OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
> >
200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>> > Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
>> > OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
>> > patronising garbage, n
[snip]
If I throw out installing a separate OS on a separate machine for each
workstation and all of the proprietary thin-client protocols, I think
I have 3 options:
1. Connect monitors, USB keyboards, and USB mice directly to a server
with multiple video cards. I found a motherboard with 6
s, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
> >>> OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
> >>> patronising garbage, namely "A suite of tools for thin provisioning on
> >>> Linux" - well, duh! Who write
be, but as with all thin client models you would need a terminal
computer for each user.
If you only have one machine and monitors, keyboards and mice for each user
then you'll need multiple video cards (and a strong power supply) for your
only PC. In this case something like http://automseat.sourceforge.net
software,
>>> control the security...
>>
>> I mean instead of rdp. It's a simple solution which works really well
>> on a LAN with Windoze. What's the equivalent that works with Linux?
>
> Well, I've never been in a company that runs Linux on the desktop, or
> wh
machine and not the thin client. I fear that this whole path, while
certainly possible, might cause me too much work. Please remember this
is a 75 year old lady who has never used Linux. ;-)
I haven't actually set anything up like this, but I was talking
to the local person at the computer lab
Hi folks,
I am trying to connect solid state thin clients (*not* LTSP ones) to a gentoo
server. There is one big problem: kdm on the gentoo box does not connect to
the X server on the thin client. I
tweaked /usr/kde/3.5/share/config/kdm/kdmrc any way I could think of - to no
avail. I even
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:15, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Hi folks,
I am trying to connect solid state thin clients (*not* LTSP ones) to a
gentoo server. There is one big problem: kdm on the gentoo box does not
connect to the X server on the thin client. I
tweaked /usr/kde/3.5/share/config/kdm
On 07 February 2006 19:26, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:15, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Hi folks,
I am trying to connect solid state thin clients (*not* LTSP ones) to a
gentoo server. There is one big problem: kdm on the gentoo box does not
connect to the X server
Thank you both Bob and Uwe that gives me something to think about.
Uve I am from South Africa. Summer is going to be a scortcher I am fearing December January.
Back on topic, I am helping out my old High School and they are wanting
to setup thin clients in all the class rooms for the teachers
What would you guys suggest in terms of specs for a server, serving
say 50 odd thin clients?
Probably 2P Opteron with 2 GB to 8 GB main memory. Cpus around 2 GHz.
You'll have to calculate the memory needs of each client plus the server's
running
overhead, and get enough memory to avoid
Am Montag, den 14.11.2005, 13:56 + schrieb James:
Hello,
I need a x86 'thin client' or small form factor computer:
(1) hard drive. (front-removable would be a bonus).
(2) empty pci slots.
(1 or more) RS232 9pin serial port.
(1) ethernet 10 or 100 mbps.
(1-2) ntsc inputs would
On 14 November 2005 15:56, James wrote:
Hello,
I need a x86 'thin client' or small form factor computer:
(1) hard drive. (front-removable would be a bonus).
(2) empty pci slots.
(1 or more) RS232 9pin serial port.
(1) ethernet 10 or 100 mbps.
(1-2) ntsc inputs would eliminate the need
and in the thin client markets? I don't think
that Redmond will have much of a problem packaging a ROM embedded version
of a thin client system and pushing it to all the Joe-public out there, who
currently (mostly) blindly buy their products. Inertia may of course lead
to their demise
to that build, USE shows the
flags that were used.
Ah, thanks for that...
Ok, so the current one was installed with::
amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux lvm1 multilib readline static static-libs
userland_GNU
And the update wants to install with:
USE=lvm1 readline thin%* udev%* (-clvm) (-cman) (-selinux
identical. The whois protocol is stupid simple
The search I made before posting led me the wikipedia article which mentioned,
for example, using thick and thin client models.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whois#Thin_and_thick_lookups
One might assume, for example, that a thin client might tend
is required for overlays (even personal local
ones). Use layout.conf from $PORTDIR as a guide. The file looks
something like this:
masters = gentoo
# Use new hashes
manifest-hashes = SHA256 SHA512 WHIRLPOOL
# Do not update changelogs
update-changelog = false
# Use thin manifests
thin-manifests = true
, and after some digging around, I
finally tracked it down to two things:
gnome-terminal-nautilus-webkit-ruby
multipath-tools-thin-provisioning-tools-ruby
These both seem to be new dependancies.
After uninstalling gnome-terminal, multipath-tools, and
thin-provisioning-tools all is good (the update
thing that needed it was thin-
provisioning. Once I'd added -thin to my USE flags and recompiled lvm2 I could
get rid of ruby altogether.
This won't suit everybody, I know, but maybe it's worth considering.
--
Regards
Peter
> On 16 Sep 2017, at 17:16, Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 September 2017 15:35:44 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
>> What really got up my nose, as mentioned above, was doing an emerge -s on
>> thing-provisioning-tools and getting
On Saturday, 16 September 2017 15:35:44 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> What really got up my nose, as mentioned above, was doing an emerge -s on
> thing-provisioning-tools and getting told it was "tools for thin
> provisioning".
I raised a bug report about that onc
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:56 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Uwe
(who is good for throwing these Chinese solid state thin clients, I
have got yesterday, out of the [wW]indows)
I hope you are referring to computer hardware and not undernourished
oriental customers :)
--
Neil Bothwick
LaForge
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 22:32, Uwe Thiem wrote:
I must have been completely brain-dead over the last couple of days.
Completely forgot that the thin client IP addresses had to be reverse
resolveable for xdmcp. =8-O
Uwe
(wondering when the other brain cell will die)
I would never
I am wondering what the difference is between using LTSP and Diskless Nodes is for creating a thin client network.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ltsp.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/diskless-howto.xml#doc_chap3
What would be the advantage of using LTSP. From what I have read (bearing
Hello,
I need a x86 'thin client' or small form factor computer:
(1) hard drive. (front-removable would be a bonus).
(2) empty pci slots.
(1 or more) RS232 9pin serial port.
(1) ethernet 10 or 100 mbps.
(1-2) ntsc inputs would eliminate the need for one of the
pci slots.
OK. Hopefully a box
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:52:33 + (UTC)
James wrote:
Uwe Thiem uwix at iway.na writes:
That isn't really a thin client but a small computer. TCs usually are
diskless.
I gather you want to use it for streaming video?
Yep,
and router (frame relay) as well).
James
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
For a laptop . . .
What do/would you use and why?
ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
solution. I thin it was originally intended for dialup use, but is well
suited to a laptop with an intermittent Internet
I'm prepping for updating some things I've been putting off, and I
noticed that lvm2 has some new use flags set, and I'm wondering why...
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 [2.02.88] USE=lvm1 readline
thin%* udev%* (-clvm) (-cman) (-selinux) -static* -static-libs* 1,166 kB
The two
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't have FEATURES=test and it still wants to pull all the ruby
one or the thin one
It's the same with me. :-)
I'd have thought it was easy enough: the zero is the same width as the
other numerals. The O is bigger.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:50:57 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I actively seek out and use fonts with a stroked zero (or at least
with a dot in the middle of the zero. I can never remember if the
digit is the fat one or the thin one
It's the same with me. :-)
I'd have thought
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:53:39 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Does anyone know how I can prevent this infestation from
happening?
It may not be possible since some packages require ruby to be present
unconditionally, e.g. webkit-gtk has a built-time dependency on ruby, and
the thin
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:53:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I need to double check memory of ancient hardware: A CD-R, that's that
thin round shiny thing about 5 across? What used to be used for music
before Napster came along? Just checking I have it right
That's right, it's like a Blu-Ray
Andrew Lowe wht.com.au> writes:
> A friend has a, I thin a few years old - Yosemite, Mac that I need to
> get some large files off.
I do not use MACos, so I might be off base here::
why can you not just use 'rsync' to transfer the files [1] ?
https://developer.apple.com/li
I upgraded thunderbird-bin from 38.7.0 to 45.0 and all window fonts
became extremely washed-out, thin and generally unreadable. I then wiped
the configuration files (mv ~/.thunderbird ~/tb_backup), but got the
same issue.
I then wiped it again and emerged normal thunderbird (sans "
On 23/04/16 03:33, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:38:00 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I upgraded thunderbird-bin from 38.7.0 to 45.0 and all window fonts
became extremely washed-out, thin and generally unreadable. I then wiped
the configuration files (mv ~/.thunderbird
On 16/09/17 06:57, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 19:56:54 CEST schrieb Andrew Lowe:
>> Hi all,
>> I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three versions of
>> Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I noticed a
&
Hi Mark,
on Tuesday, 2005-12-20 at 07:40:42, you wrote:
[thin client]
I'm sure that's possible. I could even use her current Win ME box in
some sort of dual boot config I suppose. However the reason I didn't
start with that idea is that I am not there to hand hold her. If she's
running Gnome
On 07 February 2006 19:26, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:15, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Hi folks,
I am trying to connect solid state thin clients (*not* LTSP ones) to a
gentoo server. There is one big problem: kdm on the gentoo box does not
connect to the X server
On 03/28/2013 03:11 PM, Stroller wrote:
The search I made before posting led me the wikipedia article which
mentioned, for example, using thick and thin client models.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whois#Thin_and_thick_lookups
One might assume, for example, that a thin client might tend
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't have FEATURES=test and it still wants to pull all
before, and after some digging around, I
finally tracked it down to two things:
gnome-terminal-nautilus-webkit-ruby
multipath-tools-thin-provisioning-tools-ruby
At least for thin-provisioning-tools you could use the unstable revision
that makes ruby an test-only dependency.
I understand
/make.conf
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20
Can't imagine you didn't know that. Ruby hater? :D
You could say that:
$ grep -ir -C1 ruby /etc/portage
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin
volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use
~ $ grep ruby /etc/portage/make.conf
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20
Can't imagine you didn't know that. Ruby hater? :D
You could say that:
$ grep -ir -C1 ruby /etc/portage
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin
volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools
/etc/portage
Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 19:56:54 CEST schrieb Andrew Lowe:
> Hi all,
> I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three versions of
> Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I noticed a
> thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I do
a lot of proprietary options. Is LTSP the way to go?
It may be, but as with all thin client models you would need a terminal
computer for each user.
If you only have one machine and monitors, keyboards and mice for each
user then you'll need multiple video cards (and a strong power supply
read about LTSP and a few others:
http://www.ltsp.org
http://www.thinstation.org
http://automseat.sourceforge.net
http://www.openthinclient.org
There are also a lot of proprietary options. Is LTSP the way to
go?
It may be, but as with all thin client models you would need
be, but as with all thin client models you would need a
terminal
computer for each user.
If you only have one machine and monitors, keyboards and mice for
each user
then you'll need multiple video cards (and a strong power supply)
for your
only PC. In this case something like
http
a predominant
system of choice both in the server and in the thin client markets? I
don't think that Redmond will have much of a problem packaging a ROM
embedded version of a thin client system and pushing it to all the
Joe-public out there, who currently (mostly) blindly buy their products
the answer was in Git history, in the first commit :
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/kde-base/knotes/Manifest?showmsg=1
3. Transform all Manifests to thin
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Repository_format/package/Manifest
A Thin Manifest is a Manifest file in which checksums are stored only
I've had very good luck with home-made biquad reflectors:
http://martybugs.net/wireless/biquad/
http://www.trevormarshall.com/biquad.htm
I've build both a single and a double biquad using methods
similar to the first page. I use thin-walled brass tubing
instead of copper.
Thanks, I'll
with the
username too which is a (thin) extra layer.
Is that done with 'AllowUsers user'?
- Grant
to memorize. Even if the 2
passwords are the same, I suppose they would have to come up with the
username too which is a (thin) extra layer.
just use pubkey for ssh. It is much saver anyway.
solid state thin clients, I have got
yesterday, out of the [wW]indows)
--
Unix is sexy:
who | grep -i blonde | date
cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger
mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount
sleep
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
stage. Too thick to navigate and too
thin to cultivate.
-- Doug Sneyd
Nick Rout nick at rout.co.nz writes:
That isn't really a thin client but a small computer. TCs usually are
The question is, what's it all got to do with gentoo?
Well, I understand your point, but, hardware issues
centric to gentoo, on frequent issues on this list.
I often put OT in front
On 11/14/05, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,I need a x86 'thin client' or small form factor computer:(1) hard drive. (front-removable would be a bonus).(2) empty pci slots.(1 or more) RS232 9pin serial port.(1) ethernet 10 or 100 mbps.
(1-2) ntsc inputs would eliminate the need for one
that apps can depend on a virtual x11 package,
rather than being tied to say Xorg specifically. Don't worry about it,
if you typed the name right and portage didn't find it, it's not a
problem and the right thin will happen when you emerge modular X
alan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
is with BoxBackup - which seems far more
robust... and promises the benefits of a 'continuous' backup - which I
now consider significant. The BoxBackup distribution instills a greater
sense of confidence - but documentation remains thin... and I'm
wrestling with configuring the backup daemon on a remote server
On 6/30/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipe
I wish I had one when I open my mouth. I have kept it closed for the
past few days. My foot doesn't fit well. My wedding is coming up and
my nerves are a bit thin. Yea, a guy being nervous. We do need that
cancel button. I thought someone
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
For a laptop . . .
What do/would you use and why?
ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
solution. I thin it was originally intended for dialup use, but is well
suited to a laptop
sense because the ramdisk is using memory that would otherwise
be used for compilation and filesystem caches.
tmpfs isn't implemented as a ramdisk, it's implemented as a thin layer
on top of the filesystem cache.
--
:wq
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
