On Monday 14 Nov 2005 10:13 am, maxim wexler wrote:
What's dump/restore? There are no manuals for either
and it's not mentioned in man rsync as far as I could
see.
He is talking about xfsdump/xfsrestore. They are tools available for XFS file
system and are available in sys-fs/xfsprogs package
there.
It wouldn't do much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ whatis fsck.xfs
fsck.xfs [fsck] (8) - do nothing, successfully
You need to use xfscheck for this. emerge xfsprogs and check out your
filesystem.
--
Neil Bothwick
In possession of a mind not merely twisted, but actually sprained
/xfsdump and xfsprogs.
Neither sound like they would contain mkfs.xfs. But if they do, how
can I determine that? I see no list of files or the like in their
prospective directories and no commandline flags for esearch that look
like they do that either.
The package database listed on gentoo home pages
fscked the fs w/ the latest xfsprogs ( 2.8.0) to no good
effect.
Anyone has any clue or suggestions? Else, I'm gonna go and change the FS
back to EXT3.
BTW: it's my /home which is XFS which houses GIGs of Mbox files as well
as VMware images.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
I've already updated it to the latest based on the suspend2 version.
$uname -r
2.6.17-suspend2-r4
$eix xfsprogs
Available versions: 2.7.3 2.7.11 2.8.10
Installed: 2.8.10
If not mistaken, the issue, (or barriers if not mistaken) was introduced
tried
re-mounting the FS w/ nobarriers but the performance didn't improve.
I've already fscked the fs w/ the latest xfsprogs ( 2.8.0) to no good
effect.
Anyone has any clue or suggestions? Else, I'm gonna go and change the FS
back to EXT3.
BTW: it's my /home which is XFS which
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
I've already updated it to the latest based on the suspend2 version.
$uname -r
2.6.17-suspend2-r4
$eix xfsprogs
Available versions: 2.7.3 2.7.11 2.8.10
Installed: 2.8.10
CD had a version of xfs_repair that
was too old to deal. Had to find a lap-top and plug it straight to the
outside line and get a systemrescueCD from some shady download-provider.
Believe it was sourceforge. Make sure you have an up-to date
systemrescueCD with recent-ish xfsprogs residing in you boot devi
] (8) - do nothing, successfully
You need to use xfscheck for this. emerge xfsprogs and check out your
filesystem.
--
Neil Bothwick
In possession of a mind not merely twisted, but actually sprained.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
portage tree: sys-fs/xfsdump and xfsprogs.
Neither sound like they would contain mkfs.xfs. But if they do, how
can I determine that? I see no list of files or the like in their
prospective directories and no commandline flags for esearch that look
like they do that either.
The package database
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:00:06 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can a user tell which package an uninstalled tool is in?
Asking here is one way.
For example. I want to make an xfs file system. It turn out I have
no mkfs.xfs.
I find these in my portage tree: sys-fs/xfsdump and xfsprogs
improve.
I've already fscked the fs w/ the latest xfsprogs ( 2.8.0) to no good
effect.
Anyone has any clue or suggestions? Else, I'm gonna go and change the FS
back to EXT3.
BTW: it's my /home which is XFS which houses GIGs of Mbox files as well
as VMware images.
What is your kernel version
fine.
Yes, labels . . . been thinking of doing this for the last two years! I guess
I will have to use reiserfstune for my reiserfs partitions. What about xfs -
will xfsprogs do it?
Thanks for the tip. The thing with the conventional device numbering system
is that you know which one is first
/GentooRoot just fine.
Yes, labels . . . been thinking of doing this for the last two years! I guess
I will have to use reiserfstune for my reiserfs partitions. What about xfs -
will xfsprogs do it?
The xfs_admin is used to change the label of XFS partitions:
http://linux.die.net/man/8
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Murphy wrote:
While not trying to incite flames here... xfs isn't general purpose?
xfs_fsr defrags xfs partitions while they're mounted and is designed
to be used from cron (it's in xfsdump, not xfsprogs). File
they're mounted and is designed
to be used from cron (it's in xfsdump, not xfsprogs). File
fragmentation, while a fact of life on any filesystem that sees any
real use, does slow access times, as the drive head has to jump from
one place to another, so a lot of fragmentation is a bad thing... but
as you
:15 2006 sys-fs/xfsprogs-2.7.11
Tue Apr 25 08:48:44 2006 sys-apps/memtest86+-1.65
Tue Apr 25 11:19:29 2006 net-misc/tightvnc-1.2.9-r1
However, the overnight script ran just fine after these updates
Wednesday AM.
Does anyone know what might be going on here?
Thanks,
festus
--
gentoo
Apr 25 08:44:53 2006 app-portage/portage-utils-0.1.15
Tue Apr 25 08:45:51 2006 app-editors/nano-1.3.10-r1
Tue Apr 25 08:48:15 2006 sys-fs/xfsprogs-2.7.11
Tue Apr 25 08:48:44 2006 sys-apps/memtest86+-1.65
Tue Apr 25 11:19:29 2006 net-misc/tightvnc-1.2.9-r1
However
general purpose?
xfs_fsr defrags xfs partitions while they're mounted and is designed
to be used from cron (it's in xfsdump, not xfsprogs). File
fragmentation, while a fact of life on any filesystem that sees any
real use, does slow access times, as the drive head has to jump from
one place
to incite flames here... xfs isn't general purpose?
xfs_fsr defrags xfs partitions while they're mounted and is designed
to be used from cron (it's in xfsdump, not xfsprogs). File
fragmentation, while a fact of life on any filesystem that sees any
real use, does slow access times, as the drive head has
here... xfs isn't general purpose?
xfs_fsr defrags xfs partitions while they're mounted and is designed
to be used from cron (it's in xfsdump, not xfsprogs). File
fragmentation, while a fact of life on any filesystem that sees any
real use, does slow access times, as the drive head has to jump
Tue Apr 25 08:44:53 2006 app-portage/portage-utils-0.1.15
Tue Apr 25 08:45:51 2006 app-editors/nano-1.3.10-r1
Tue Apr 25 08:48:15 2006 sys-fs/xfsprogs-2.7.11
Tue Apr 25 08:48:44 2006 sys-apps/memtest86+-1.65
Tue Apr 25 11:19:29 2006 net-misc/tightvnc-1.2.9-r1
System uses mailx
too, installed)
> > sys-apps/util-linux required by (sys-apps/gptfdisk-1.0.3:0/0::gentoo,
> > installed)
> > sys-apps/util-linux:0=[static-libs(+)?] (sys-apps/util-linux:0=)
> > required by (sys-fs/btrfs-progs-4.13.3:0/0::gentoo, installed)
> > sys-apps/util-li
oo, installed)
> sys-apps/util-linux:0/0= required by
> (sys-fs/btrfs-progs-4.13.3:0/0::gentoo, installed)
> >=sys-apps/util-linux-2.16 required by (dev-libs/apr-1.6.3:1/1::gentoo,
> ebuild scheduled for merge)
> >=sys-apps/util-linux-2.17.2 required by
> (sy
progs-4.13.3:0/0::gentoo, installed)
> sys-apps/util-linux:0/0= required by
> (sys-fs/btrfs-progs-4.13.3:0/0::gentoo, installed)
> >=sys-apps/util-linux-2.16 required by
> >(dev-libs/apr-1.6.3:1/1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> >=sys-apps/util-linux-2.17.2
7.2 required by
(sys-fs/xfsprogs-4.13.1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>=sys-apps/util-linux-2.20 required by
(sys-block/gparted-0.29.0:0/0::gentoo, installed)
sys-apps/util-linux required by (app-admin/apache-tools-2.4.29:0/0::gentoo,
ebuild scheduled for merge)
>=sys-apps/util-linux-2.20.1-
-scripts-26
sys-fs/xfsprogs-3.1.10
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.10.17
sys-kernel/linux-firmware-20130728
sys-libs/cracklib-2.8.19
sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.42.7
sys-libs/glibc-2.16.0
sys-libs/gpm-1.20.7-r1
sys-libs/libcap-ng-0.7.3
sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r2
sys-libs/pam-1.1.6-r2
sys-libs/readline-6.2_p1
sys
utoconf-archive-2018.03.13
sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper-13-r1
sys-devel/automake-1.16.1-r1
sys-devel/automake-wrapper-11
sys-devel/bc-1.06.95-r2
sys-devel/binutils-2.33.1-r1
sys-devel/binutils-config-5.2
sys-devel/bison-3.1
sys-devel/clang-9.0.1
sys-devel/clang-common-9.0.1
sys-devel/clang-runtime-9.0.1
s
28 matches
Mail list logo
