On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 19:38, Wijlens, Joris (J.) wrote: > That's no problem, I won't trust anyone anymore ;). I understand that you > are working on the problem and I won't bother you with questions about when > this is fixed. But what is important to me is that coming releases will work > on 1.3 JRE, but looking at the state of HEAD of the CVS repository I fear > ... Can you tell me what your strategy is going to be regarding this issue.
Boy, are you ever talking to the wrong person :) * I haven't ever looked at CVS HEAD. * I first looked at xml-security about two days before my initial post to the list, a couple of weeks ago. * I'm only using it in a pet project. * My day job has no professional interest in or requirement for xml-security - or Java, for that matter, which is a good thing 'coz: * I don't even *like* Java :) Mind you, that's at least two of us now who would like to see this addressed, so, to whomever the official developer crew might be, is this an issue that's going to be looked at for the next release? I know Raul has his own workaround for the namespace situation that he has advocated on this list previously, so maybe it isn't something that you're concerned about? If it isn't on the official radar, I'll probably come back to it in a few days or weeks - I get absurdly over-enthusiastic about pet projects at times, and emitting ugly XML is one of those things that's going to stop me from sleeping soundly at night. m.
