Simon Funnell
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:57:16 -0800
Thanks, Simon Stefano Bagnara wrote:
2009/11/26 Simon Funnell <simonfunn...@googlemail.com>:Hi, Thanks, I have the latest code base and have been taking a look around. I have also been looking at JSR250 and OSGI. If version 3 is well on its way it is probably best I look towards version 4, which attempts to refine existing feature definitions for the purpose of adding management services. This will allow me to continue working on documentation without disturbing anyone else as you can look at it any time over the next month :) don't be surprised if I go berserk (in the sense of ruthless).Version 3 is in trunk since years and there is no roadmap. Version numbers are not important at all and we already understood that there is no way to define a roadmap in JAMES. Simply contribute things against the codebase: the choice to include it before or after the release will be made once the proposed patch is real and ready to be committed. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org