On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:34:11 +0100, David Legg wrote: > I don't know why you say you couldn't get it to work. I'm assuming you > trained it by sending it spam and ham messages. It takes a while to > improve itself and you do have to religiously send it any spam that > escapes. Give it at least a week before measuring its success rate.
I really couldn't get it to work. I got some kind of exception, but I don't remember what. I'm using a derby database for the spools and such. I think it had a problem with finding a place to put things. I wasn't sure what to do to get it to work, so I turned it off. Should I give it another shot and provide you people with error details? I assumed it wasn't a fully implemented feature yet. > One final word. Don't put too much reliance on DNS blacklists. One > worrying trend at the moment is for spammers to hire armies of drones to > manually overcome the Captcha technology used by Google and Yahoo to > create legitimate accounts from which they can send auto-responder > emails. No genuine blacklist is going to put Google or Yahoo on their > lists! This is a problem. I thought spamcop would work better than it does. It is far better than the other blacklist, but still lets through a lot of spam. -- Kenneth P. Turvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
