Hi Pete, James will not store sent emails anywhere by itself. Anyway what you mean with "quite hard on the disc" ? Does it use heavy I/O ? I don't have any expierence in using JAMES on a Windows Server so I can't say anything about tuning fs etc.
So maybe a DB would help... Bye, Norman 2009/10/21 Pete Williams <[email protected]>: > > Hi > > I'm a new James user, > > James is working reliably but it seems to be quite hard on the disc, to the > extent that it is affecting other applications. > > I've read the mailing list and wondered what is the best way to go. > > A few things that might help. > > - I don't need the server to store sent emails. If this will help, how can I > use config.xml to stop James storing these? > > - Is adding a database into the equation likely to help? I've had some > difficulty trying to get the Microsoft JDBC driver working (it requires SSL > on SQL server which I don't have). If this will reduce disc contention I can > persevere with this, maybe trying another driver. > > I have the following config.xml settings. > > Max connections 2000 > Timeout 200 > Max threads 100 > Min threads 20 > > > There are something like 140 POP3 clients checking email every 90 seconds, > and 140 SMTP clients, each of which sends and email about once every 4 > minutes. > > Any help appreciated. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stay in touch with your friends through Messenger on your mobile > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
