I'll post my jstacks as soon as I can, but here's my 2nd line:

Full thread dump OpenJDK Client VM (20.0-b11 mixed mode, sharing):

I'm just using the bin/james script that ships with james 3.0-beta3 to startup.



On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Simon A
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Raju's stack dump indicated that he was running HotSpot 14.0 Client
> mode. If possible try running on a more recent Oracle JDK VM in Server
> mode.
>
> If that's not an option try adding -XX:+UseMembar to your startup.sh
> and restart James.
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6822370
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After restarting James several times, 1) all mails continued to be
>> spooled, and 2) not all mails previously spooled were actually sent
>> out after restart.  Thus, I had to run a new James server and point
>> DNS to it.
>>
>> But I did not terminate the broken server, so it is still there for
>> debugging purposes.
>>
>> Please let me know what information I can pull off of that broken
>> James server to help find a resolution to this severe problem.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zach
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> James is currently spooling all of our incoming email and not
>>> processing it.  I took 4 jstack dumps. Anything else I can look at
>>> quickly before I have to restart James?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> mailetcontainer.xml has:
>>>>
>>>>  <spooler>
>>>>    <threads> 20 </threads>
>>>>  </spooler>
>>>>
>>>> After running all night, there are still only 4 blocked Camel threads,
>>>> and for the most part James appears to be processing all emails
>>>> properly. I will do some more testing this morning, and try to force a
>>>> bunch of these HTTP requests and see if I can lock it up.
>>>>
>>>> Just taking another look at our stack trace. In this mailet, we use
>>>> DefaultHttpClient with ThreadSafeClientConnManager. I know this is not
>>>> the Apache HttpClient mailing list, but does this mean it's not
>>>> blocking on a request with no response, but it's blocking just trying
>>>> to get a connection from the connection pool?
>>>>
>>>>  java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>>>       at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>>>       - parking to wait for  <0x7aff2ee0> (a
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>>>>       at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>>>       at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.WaitingThread.await(WaitingThread.java:158)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ConnPoolByRoute.getEntryBlocking(ConnPoolByRoute.java:403)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ConnPoolByRoute$1.getPoolEntry(ConnPoolByRoute.java:300)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ThreadSafeClientConnManager$1.getConnection(ThreadSafeClientConnManager.java:224)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultRequestDirector.java:401)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:820)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:754)
>>>>       at 
>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:732)
>>>>
>>>> That stack trace looks almost identical up towards the top as all of
>>>> the other "normal" Camel threads like this one:
>>>>
>>>> "Camel Thread 72 - Split" prio=10 tid=0x0a1ebc00 nid=0x10b5 waiting on
>>>> condition [0xb0e7a000]
>>>>   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>>>        at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>>>        - parking to wait for  <0x7a6a2ca0> (a
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>>>>        at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>>>        at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
>>>>        at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:386)
>>>>        at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1043)
>>>>        at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1103)
>>>>        at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>>>>        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>>>>
>>>> I just want to make sure I understand how exactly this mailet is blocking.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Zach
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Norman Maurer
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> how many spooling threads did you specifiy in mailetcontainer.xml ?
>>>>>
>>>>> About the split threads... If a Matcher "split" and email into parts
>>>>> Camel will process this new parts in seperate threads. And no, 4
>>>>> blocked threads should not block all the others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye,
>>>>> Norman
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/9/16 Zach Cox <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> I just noticed James starting to spool some emails and did some
>>>>>> jstacks. I found several threads like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Camel Thread 65 - Split" prio=10 tid=0x0a1c1400 nid=0x10ae waiting on
>>>>>> condition [0xb105f000]
>>>>>>   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>>>>>        at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>>>>>        - parking to wait for  <0x7aff2ee0> (a
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.WaitingThread.await(WaitingThread.java:158)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ConnPoolByRoute.getEntryBlocking(ConnPoolByRoute.java:403)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ConnPoolByRoute$1.getPoolEntry(ConnPoolByRoute.java:300)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ThreadSafeClientConnManager$1.getConnection(ThreadSafeClientConnManager.java:224)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultRequestDirector.java:401)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:820)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:754)
>>>>>>        at 
>>>>>> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:732)
>>>>>> <rest is redacted>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of our custom mailets makes an HTTP request to a 3rd party site.
>>>>>> Usually this works fine, but apparently sometimes this other site does
>>>>>> not send back an HTTP response, keeps the request open forever, and
>>>>>> the Apache HttpClient is not doing any kind of timeouts, so this
>>>>>> request stays open and seems to block a thread forever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What exactly do these 200 Camel Threads do?  Currently we have 4 Camel
>>>>>> threads blocked like this.  But I wouldn't think 4 out of 200 would
>>>>>> cause James to stop processing all incoming emails? James is still
>>>>>> processing some emails, but stuck on others. We will let James run all
>>>>>> night, and see if eventually all 200 get blocked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, wanted to share this.  In the morning we will add timeouts to
>>>>>> these HTTP requests (as well as any others we do) and see if that
>>>>>> helps things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Zach
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Raju Buchi 
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I guess the attachment was sent over. I have created a Bug report.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1317
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Raju
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Raju Buchi 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have got the issue again today where the mails are stuck in spool
>>>>>>>> and all the mails sent to the server will just say
>>>>>>>> INFO  19:02:25,581 | james.smtpserver | ID=17053510 Successfully
>>>>>>>> spooled mail Mail1316127745577-3dd610ec-2f53-4dcd-ad87-fa9b8401d84b
>>>>>>>> from ...............
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But those mails will never be sent out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to run jstack as Norman mentioned and exported the output
>>>>>>>> (Attached File).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please let me know if we can figure out what the issue is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Raju
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jstack requires a JDK to be installed, not just a JRE (as I discovered
>>>>>>>>> earlier today).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Raju Buchi 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The mails are now stuck up in spool on my server. Can any one tell 
>>>>>>>>>> me how to
>>>>>>>>>> debug. I tried to use jstack, but it says jstack: command not found.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Raju
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK so the cause of this shutdown problem was setting jmx.address=
>>>>>>>>>>> public IP address of the server in conf/jmx.properties.  Just had 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> exact same problem on a fresh install of James. I changed 
>>>>>>>>>>> jmx.address
>>>>>>>>>>> back to 127.0.0.1 and James now starts up properly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is also no mention of anything related to jmx in the logs when
>>>>>>>>>>> James is unable to start up because of using the public IP address 
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> jmx.address.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > Sorry, had to replace that EC2 instance with a new one, need to 
>>>>>>>>>>> > keep
>>>>>>>>>>> > emails flowing...
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > So that server is gone, but we still have all of the logs.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > If this happens again I will try moving activemq dir.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Zach
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Norman Maurer
>>>>>>>>>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hmm..
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> never saw this problem. But could you try to move the activemq 
>>>>>>>>>>> >> dir out
>>>>>>>>>>> >> of the way.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> # mv /path/to/james/var/store/activemq
>>>>>>>>>>> /path/to/james/var/store/activemq.crc
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> After that try to start again..
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Bye,
>>>>>>>>>>> >> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> 2011/9/15 Zach Cox <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> And now every time I start James, after it completes startup, 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> it just
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> shuts down:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:26  INFO smtpserver:? - Init SMTP Service done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:26 DEBUG ConfigurationUtils:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> ConfigurationUtils.locate(): base is null, name is null
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:26  INFO lmtpserver:? - LMTP Service disabled 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> by
>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:26 DEBUG ConfigurationUtils:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> ConfigurationUtils.locate(): base is null, name is null
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:26  INFO pop3server:? - POP3 Service disabled 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> by
>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27 DEBUG ConfigurationUtils:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> ConfigurationUtils.locate(): base is null, name is null
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO imapserver:? - IMAP Service disabled 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> by
>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27 DEBUG ConfigurationUtils:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> ConfigurationUtils.locate(): base is null, name is null
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO usersrepository23:? - Init
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.repository.file.FilePersistentObjectRepository 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Store
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO usersrepository23:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.repository.file.FilePersistentObjectRepository 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> opened
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> in ../var/users
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27 DEBUG usersrepository23:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.user.file.UsersFileRepository created in
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> file://var/users/
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO imapserver:? - Dispose IMAP Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO imapserver:? - Dispose IMAP Service 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO pop3server:? - Dispose POP3 Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO pop3server:? - Dispose POP3 Service 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO lmtpserver:? - Dispose LMTP Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO lmtpserver:? - Dispose LMTP Service 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO smtpserver:? - Dispose SMTP Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO smtpserver:? - Dispose SMTP Service 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO mailspooler:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> dispose...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO mailspooler:? - Stop
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> dequeuer-1
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO mailspooler:? - Stop
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> dequeuer-2
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:27  INFO mailspooler:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler thread 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> shutdown
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> completed.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> 2011-09-15 17:56:30  INFO SocketNode:94 - Caught 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> java.io.EOFException
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> closing conneciton.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> OK now several minutes after I restarted James, everything was 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> fine, then all of a sudden I see this while tailing 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> james-server.log:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 2011-09-15 17:51:24  WARN DefaultShutdownStrategy:? - Timeout
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> occurred. Now forcing the routes to be shutdown now.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 2011-09-15 17:51:24  WARN DefaultShutdownStrategy:? - 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> while waiting during graceful shutdown, will force shutdown 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 2011-09-15 17:51:24  WARN DefaultInflightRepository:? - 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Shutting down
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> while there are still 8 in flight exchanges.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 2011-09-15 17:51:26  INFO SocketNode:94 - Caught 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> java.io.EOFException
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> closing conneciton.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> And James just shuts down.  This is incredibly bad to have a 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> mail
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> server just shut down out of the blue...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Zach Cox <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Also when James is starting up I see this in logs:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> 2011-09-15 17:45:05  WARN AMQPersistenceAdapter:? - The
>>>>>>>>>>> ReferenceStore
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> is not valid - recovering ...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> I'm guessing that's not a good thing?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Zach Cox <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think we're seeing the problem again yet, but I just 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> had to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> restart James and noticed this on shutdown:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO JamesServerApplicationContext:? - 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Closing
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.james.container.spring.context.JamesServerApplicationContext@86fe26
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> startup date [Thu Sep 15 12:20:21 UTC 2011]; root of context
>>>>>>>>>>> hierarchy
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO imapserver:? - Dispose IMAP Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO imapserver:? - Dispose IMAP 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Service done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO pop3server:? - Dispose POP3 Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO pop3server:? - Dispose POP3 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Service done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO lmtpserver:? - Dispose LMTP Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO lmtpserver:? - Dispose LMTP 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Service done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO smtpserver:? - Dispose SMTP Service
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO smtpserver:? - Dispose SMTP 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Service done
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:31  INFO mailspooler:? -
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> dispose...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:32  INFO mailspooler:? - Stop
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> dequeuer-2
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:32  INFO mailspooler:? - Stop
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> org.apache.james.mailetcontainer.impl.JamesMailSpooler: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> dequeuer-1
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> 2011-09-15 16:48:51  INFO SocketNode:94 - Caught
>>>>>>>>>>> java.io.EOFException
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> closing conneciton.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Is that java.io.EOFException normal and expected? Or is it a 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> sign of
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> some problems?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Zach
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Norman Maurer
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Using:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> # jstack <pid>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please take 3 within on minute ...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bye,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011/9/15 Zach Cox <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I had to restart James several times this morning so 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> nothing is
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> blocked at the moment.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is nothing indicated in the log files. Things look 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> normal,
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> then they look like this:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:25:26  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=8443803 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> established from x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:25:31  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=8443803 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> spooled mail
>>>>>>>>>>> Mail1316049931087-05b8199e-e01f-4d14-84d5-3d7ac2443bb3
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> from x on x for [x]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:25:36  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=8443803 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> closed for x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:25:47  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11521429 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> established from x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:25:48  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11521429 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> spooled mail
>>>>>>>>>>> Mail1316049948254-abd67e8f-bafe-41ab-8eef-c551420fd56e
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> from x on x for [x]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:25:48  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11521429 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> closed for x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:26:41  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=5675333 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> established from x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:26:52  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=5675333 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> spooled mail
>>>>>>>>>>> Mail1316050012621-522b1f2a-2851-46fb-940c-711591f637cc
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> from x on x for [x]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:26:57  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=5675333 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> closed for x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:27:52  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=33404412 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> established from localhost (127.0.0.1)
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:27:52  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=33404412 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for localhost (127.0.0.1)
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:28:12  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11673762 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> established from x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:28:22  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11673762 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> spooled mail
>>>>>>>>>>> Mail1316050102393-6fcc21aa-8f32-4935-b0eb-df892d54a5e8
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> from x on x for [x]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011-09-15 01:28:27  INFO smtpserver:? - ID=11673762 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Connection
>>>>>>>>>>> closed for x
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So every mail that comes in just gets spooled and not 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> processed.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When this starts happening again, what's the best way to 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> take a
>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> dump from James?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Zach
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Norman Maurer
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> please take a thread-dump to see why its blocked...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anything in the logs ?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bye,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2011/9/15 Zach Cox <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We upgraded to James 3.0-beta3 on Tuesday night. Things 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> worked
>>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> until around 9pm last night, where exactly the same 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> occurring: mail would get spooled, but not processed.  
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> restarting James, some of the mail was then processed
>>>>>>>>>>> successfully,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but most was lost.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We consider this an emergency situation for our company 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and need
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> find a resolution ASAP. What kind of information can we 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> help find a resolution? If financial resources need to be
>>>>>>>>>>> involved to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> find a resolution or move things along, that is an 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> option.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any help is most greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Zach
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Norman Maurer
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No problems...
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you still can replicate then please open a issue 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>>>>>>> stack trace
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> attached..
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bye,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011/9/13 Raju Buchi <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> James 3.0-M2. I will try to stand up a new server with 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> beta3
>>>>>>>>>>> and see if I
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> can replicate the issue.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Raju
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Norman Maurer <
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you use beta3 ?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bye,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011/9/13 Raju Buchi <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hello
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > We are also facing exactly the same issues. Tried 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > to debug
>>>>>>>>>>> my custom
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailets
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > and seems to be everything is working fine. Logs 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > did not
>>>>>>>>>>> show any
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exception
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > messages except it will always spool a mail and 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > will never
>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> send
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > it. i.e. all mails are stuck in the spool.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > - Raju
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Zach Cox <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> We are having a severe problem with James 3.0-M2 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> where it
>>>>>>>>>>> will operate
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> correctly for hours or days, and then all of a 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> sudden it
>>>>>>>>>>> will not
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> process a lot of the mail it spools.  Sometimes it 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> will
>>>>>>>>>>> not process
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> *any* mail that it spools, and other times it will 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> spool a
>>>>>>>>>>> bunch of
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> mail, and then process others seemingly at random. 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>  I have
>>>>>>>>>>> to restart
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> James to get that spooled mail to be processed.  
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> But even
>>>>>>>>>>> then,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> sometimes the spooled mail is completely lost 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> after a
>>>>>>>>>>> restart.  I have
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> seen several other threads lately with similar 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> problems,
>>>>>>>>>>> but they
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> haven't helped our situation.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> We do not store mail in James for personal 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> accounts and we
>>>>>>>>>>> have IMAP &
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> POP3 disabled.  Every inbound email has one of two 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> things
>>>>>>>>>>> done to it:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>  - it is processed locally by custom mailets & 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> matchers
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>  - or it is relayed to our corporate Google Apps 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> account
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> A previous thread recommended checking all custom 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> mailets
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> matchers.  As far as I can tell, they are all 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> working
>>>>>>>>>>> properly.  There
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> are no exceptions or errors in 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> log/james-server.log, and
>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> scenario where James spools some mail & processes 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> others,
>>>>>>>>>>> the mail
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> that is processed is handled properly by our custom
>>>>>>>>>>> mailets &
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> matchers.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I've tried connecting to James JMX remotely via 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> JConsole
>>>>>>>>>>> but have not
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> been able to connect.  Which port does James run 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> JMX on?
>>>>>>>>>>>  Any help
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> with JMX would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Does anyone have any other ideas about what we 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> should look
>>>>>>>>>>> for?  I
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> noticed 3.0-beta3 is out now, were there fixes in 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> beta3
>>>>>>>>>>> related to
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> mail being spooled but not processed?
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Zach
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Raju Buchi
>>>>>>>> Web Developer | Content Pilot LLC
>>>>>>>> Mobile: 817.313.2578
>>>>>>>> Email: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Website: http://www.rajubuchi.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Raju Buchi
>>>>>>> Web Developer | Content Pilot LLC
>>>>>>> Mobile: 817.313.2578
>>>>>>> Email: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>>> Website: http://www.rajubuchi.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to