me
Mon, 20 May 2002 16:58:47 -0700
any os not in the list that might be able to be installed? unix? solaris? freebsd? or anything? Quoting "Evan T. Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I suspect that from that list, Linux would be the fastest choice. After > that, I'd recommend Windows 95, assuming it has enough RAM (at least 16MB) > as Windows 3.x is truly ancient and not really worth installing on any > machine still worth the electricity needed to boot and run it. > > Evan > > At 03:12 PM 5/20/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > >ive got an old pb 486 id like to get running some wu for me > >i know it prolly wont output very many > >but right now its just a paperweight > >so i might as well put it to good use > > > >what im needing to know is > >what is the best os to run seti in > >since it wont run in dos even with the cmd line version > > > >windows 1.01 wont install on it > >or anything higher than win95 > >ive succesfully installed: > >win95 > >win 3.11 > >and a version of linux for the 486 > > > >any ideas or comments are welcome > >== > >Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html > >This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. > >Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com > > > == > Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html > This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. > Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com > > == Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online. Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com