GLHSHELBY
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:35:01 -0700
In a message dated 4/25/2007 10:19:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well said, I'm just thankful the prices are low. I love the cars and more than likely will NEVER be able to buy another Challenger R/T. It was easy when I graduated in 1974. I got my 87 GLHS for $1,500 a year ago. This was after a guy I know bought it off ebay and made at least $400 profit. I was happy to pay that. This car had 50,894 actual miles at that time. It needs paint and a bit of work, but it's pretty solid. I believe the glhs,iroc r/t`s,and possible the daytona shelby just becasue of the looks will go up slightly but the old musclecars were actually pretty fast from the factory unlike most TD`s. Td`s even have a bad rep in the mopar community. I just don`t see these going up in value a lot because you can get GN`s and SRT-4`s all day long and their performance overall is a lot better. It`s just like the shelby dakota values being low.Why spend that kind of cash on a truck that slower than a lot of v6`s that you can barely drive because of the seating position and no extended cab.You can get a dakota r/t if you want speed. I really wish during the late 80`s and early 90`s I would have spent a little more time hunting for challengers and cuda`s instead of getting multiple TD`s. I originally got my cuda in 1987 and even with it needing a lot of work I turned down 44k just last week for it mainly because I know that I`d never be able to get another one even though I wanted that Jeep SRT-8 very badly.I`m pretty sure that no turbo dodge will ever double the sticker price it originally sold for. Travis Foster Fountain Inn,S.C. 89 Daytona Shelby 71 383 `Cuda 98 slate 5.9 limited ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -----------------------REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING---------------------------- Questions? Visit http://www.sdml.org/ To be removed, visit http://www.sdml.org/pages/leave.html