Hey Friends of Spamdyke, and Hello Sam, Godfather of spam blocking! I use
dns-blacklist-entry=ix.dnsbl.manitu.net dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org so far and the only false positives i get are delivered using accounts from m$, yahoo, gmx, web.de, t-online. Not many false positives though, but there are some. But i cant block their mailservers. I will give barracudecentral a try. Regards, Arne -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: [spamdyke-users] RBLs Von: Sam Clippinger <s...@silence.org> An: spamdyke users <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> Datum: Sonntag, 9. März 2014 20:21:03 > I only use b.barracudacentral.org, zen.spamhaus.org and > fresh.spameatingmonkey.com, plus my private list that's generated by the > hunter_seeker script. My logs from just today show Barracuda is responsible > for 90% of the RBL rejections. Spamhaus generated 10% and Spam Eating Monkey > is 0%. My private list has blocked about 4.5 times more connections today > than the DNS RBLs. > > Lutz, I don't understand your animosity towards Barracuda Central, but my own > experience has shown it's a very effective list. Looking at the to/from > addresses on the connections it's blocked today, I'd say those connections > were all spam. When I install a new server for a customer and they begin > complaining about spam, I add b.barracudacentral.org and the complaints stop. > When one of my customers' email accounts is compromised and used for sending > spam, Barracuda is usually the second RBL to notice (CBL is almost always > first). When I request delisting, it's usually done within a few hours. > Obviously your experience has been different, but I have no complaints. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > > > > On Mar 9, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Gary Gendel <g...@genashor.com> wrote: > >> I tend to agree. The lists I've chosen have been the result of many >> years of tuning. Actually shlink.org wasn't even in my radar and isn't >> on many of the multi-rbl test sites so I need to test it. >> >> I'd be curious to hear about Sam's blacklist setup. >> >> Gary >> >> On 03/09/2014 09:24 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: >>> Again, as I said: this is from my own personal experience, but after >>> having started using since 2 Dec 2013, it's consistently been giving >>> good results, and I have yet to encounter a single false positive. >>> >>> I'm not saying anyone else should use the DNSBL, but I will say that >>> anyone who blindly listens to my or your assertions without doing their >>> own testing ... gets exactly what they deserve. >>> >>> >>> On 3/9/14 3:54 AM, Lutz Petersen wrote: >>>>> Funny, based on my own empirical evidence, Barracuda Central's DNSBL >>>>>> yields the best results. >>>> 99% of this Hits are false positives: >>>> >>>>>> 6956 81.35% b.barracudacentral.org >>>> You are talking simply nonsense ! >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spamdyke-users mailing list >> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
