I'm not sure I understand your question.  If you want to block messages without 
a "From" line in their header, spamdyke can't do that.  You may be able to use 
a secondary filter like maildrop to delete the message after it is accepted 
however.

-- Sam Clippinger




On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Linux via spamdyke-users 
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:

> sorry to hang me for this post, but I would consult them taking advantage of 
> the conversation can be locked via e-mail comes without sender? I'm getting a 
> lot of spam that has this pattern.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 2015-10-03 1:05 GMT-03:00 Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users 
> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>:
> Sam,
> 
> 
> On 2015-10-02 23:47, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
> I guess so, but remember the wildcarding uses globbing, not regexes.
> What I mean is: using "?*" is equivalent to just "*".
> 
> 
> Right.
> 
> 
> Also, the line
> has to contain at least one colon or spamdyke won't use it (message
> headers always use a colon to separate the field name from the value).
> 
> 
> Yep.
> 
> 
> Why not just use multiple entries in the file? If either one matches,
> the message will be blocked and it'd be easier to understand:
>  From: *@skysoft.com [1]
>  Reply-To: *@skysoft.com [1]
> 
> 
> Doubling the number of lines offends my sensibilities . . this works:
> 
>   [FR][re][op][ml]*:*iskysoft.com*
> 
> Also, sorting this issue out forced me to sort out the rDNS problem for my 
> main web server - so thanks for that too!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil.
> 
> 
> -- Sam Clippinger
> 
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-10-02 15:42, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote:
> Sam,
> On 2015-09-26 01:12, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
> The header blacklist file has a different format from the sender
> blacklist file, so just copying entries from one to the other won't
> work. You need to provide a pattern that matches the line(s) in the
> message header -- in your mail client, you should have an option to
> "view message source" or "view raw headers" that will show you what
> it
> looks like. In this specific case, you probably want this:
> Reply-To: *@skysoft.com [1] [3]*
> The format is case insensitive and uses globbing for wildcards, so *
> will match multiple characters and [] will match a set or range of
> characters, just like the bash command prompt. The filter will
> ignore
> any lines in the file that don't contain a colon. Full details here:
> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#HEADERS [2] [4]
> So if I wanted to block the same address for both From: and
> Reply-To:
> I could use:
> [fr][re][op][ml].*@skysoft.com [1]
> 
>  [fr][re][op][ml]?*@skysoft.com [1]
> 
> so "*" doesn't repeat only "[ml]" ?
> 
> ?
> Thanks,
> Phil.
> For testing, you certainly can use telnet -- I do it all the time.
> Just make sure the host you telnet from isn't blocked or whitelisted
> for some other reason (most folks whitelist localhost, for example).
> -- Sam Clippinger
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:31 AM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
> Sam,
> On 2015-09-15 07:27, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
> Actually, no. The sender-blacklist-* and recipient-blacklist-*
> filters
> operate on different data from the header-blacklist-* filters. The
> reason is because the sender and recipient addresses are given
> during
> the SMTP protocol and aren't part of the message itself -- the
> addresses you see in your mail client are the From and To entries
> from
> the message header. The first paragraph here explains in a little
> more
> detail:
> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_SENDERS
> [3]
> 
> [1]
> [1]
> Yes, sorry, I should have realised that . .
> Put another way, the sender address doesn't have to match the
> "From"
> address visible in the mail client -- well-behaved mail clients
> make
> them the same, but that's a courtesy and not a requirement. The
> Reply-To address is part of the message header and, again, is only
> a
> convention used by well-behaved clients. If you've ever been Bcc'd
> on
> a message, you've seen this in action -- the sender's mail client
> gave
> your address as a recipient but didn't put your address on the
> "To"
> line in the message header.
> Right, so, some follow up questions: I moved the following from the
> sender-blacklist to the header-blacklist:
> @iskysoft.com [2]
> - first in the conf file then later into a separate
> header-blacklist-file with all the massaged addresses from my old
> setup - but the sender above still seems to be getting through. I
> thought the "@" was supposed to act like a wild card? Am I still
> doing something wrong?
> When I add addresses etc to blacklists etc, is there any way of
> doing a test myself to see that the block is working? Using a telnet
> to port 25 on my qmail server and manually pasting header lines is
> not a real test is it?
> Thanks,
> Phil.
> -- Sam Clippinger
> On Sep 13, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
> Sam,
> On 2015-09-14 11:38, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure I understand your question... if the
> Reply-To
> address is always the same, you should be able to block it using
> the
> header blacklist filter.
> Ah . . OK - I will try that but doesn't that mean that:
> sender-blacklist-entry
> is redundant - ie:
> header-blacklist-entry
> should cover everything?
> Thanks,
> Phil.
> If you're wanting to compare the Reply-To
> address to the From address or the sender address, spamdyke
> doesn't
> have that ability.
> -- Sam Clippinger
> On Sep 13, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
> People,
> One variety of spam that is successfully delivered to me has a
> different "From:" addresses but the same "Reply-To:" address - I
> can't see a way of blocking these mails in the conf file via the
> "Reply-To:" address - is it possible?
> Thanks,
> Phil.
> --
> Philip Rhoades
> PO Box 896
> Cowra NSW 2794
> Australia
> E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>  --
> Philip Rhoades
> PO Box 896
> Cowra NSW 2794
> Australia
> E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_SENDERS
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> --
> Philip Rhoades
> PO Box 896
> Cowra NSW 2794
> Australia
> E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_SENDERS
> [2] http://iskysoft.com
> [3] http://skysoft.com
> [4] http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#HEADERS
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> --
> Philip Rhoades
> 
> PO Box 896
> Cowra NSW 2794
> Australia
> E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://skysoft.com
> [2] http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#HEADERS
> [3] http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_SENDERS
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> -- 
> Philip Rhoades
> 
> PO Box 896
> Cowra  NSW  2794
> Australia
> E-mail:  p...@pricom.com.au
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to