> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:09 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> On 01/28/2010 06:07 AM, Robert Collins wrote: >> > Just a small thing: can I suggest s/virgin/pristine/ ? Or >> > s/virgin/received/ ? >> >> Pristine may work, but we (and other adaptation related documents) use >> virgin in many places already, including APIs. >> >> Received is a bad idea because an adapted message is also received. >> >> > virgin has a sexual connotation in some cultures, and can be confusing >> > in a way that is avoidable. >> >> Tell that to the Virgin Islands folks. :-) > > It was a passing thought, I'm not like 'omg must be done' for this: I > certainly knew what it meant, but as its (AFAIK) the first config option > in squid to specify virgins, I see potential for confusion :) Other > possibilities: > - source > - external > - unaltered > - original
Yep, I think we should use "original" for documentation. But for code requires many changes in many places... > > I don't know that the config option has to meet the code, though > obviously it is nice if it does. > > -Rob >
