On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Richard Tew <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Jeff Senn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I thought I patched that (or sent a patch to someone...) >> >> I believe it is as simple as finding the declarations of those >> types (perhaps on exactly the lines you mention) >> and getting rid of the "static" declaration. >> >> > You probably sent the patch to someone. I spent today going over the > Stackless branches, and merged unmerged changes all around. In the process > I never saw unmerged changes resembling this description. > > If you check the changes in, please check them into one of the following > and merge them to the others on the list :-) > > Okay, in order to polish off any outstanding Stackless work I could think of, so that I do not have it hanging over my head I looked for patches that had been sent to me or the list and not applied. http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/2010-July/004766.html In this case, you more than likely applied them to trunk, but they didn't seem to get merged around. I applied them to release27-maint, fixed any other warnings I saw and merged the changes around the branches. Cheers, Richard.
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
