On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Alberto Ganesh Barbati < [email protected]> wrote:
> Richard Tew ha scritto: > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Nicolas Stein <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Am I right in assuming that, if I never use preemptive scheduling, I > >> never need to use "...set_atomic(True)...", > >> to guarantee the atomicity of the middle block ? > > > > Yes. > > > > By the way, will stackless provide context manager for atomicity to be > used in the "with" statement? I mean, wouldn't it be good to be able to > write: > > with stackless.atomic(): > your_code_here() > > .... Same thing, possibly, for set_ignore_nesting(). > > Just over two years later, but I would like to note that you can now do this using Kristjan Valur's stacklesslib. See: http://code.google.com/p/stacklessexamples/source/browse/trunk/libraries/stacklesslib/util.py <http://code.google.com/p/stacklessexamples/source/browse/trunk/libraries/stacklesslib/util.py> Cheers, Richard.
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
