2011/9/8 Kristján Valur Jónsson <[email protected]>:
> On Behalf Of Richard Tew:
>> No? What goes on at interpreter shut down? Don't we go through the list of
>> tasklets in some function there killing them? I seem to recall fixing a
>> crash
>> bug there at some stage in the past.
> tasklets are killed if their reference goes to zero and they are still alive.
> I think we rely on reference counting to do their job.
I dashed off the last email just before I hit the sack, and didn't
have the time to search. But this is what I meant:
pystate.c:268
void
PyThreadState_Clear(PyThreadState *tstate)
{
#ifdef STACKLESS
STACKLESS_PYSTATE_CLEAR;
#endif
stackless_tstate.h:102
#define STACKLESS_PYSTATE_CLEAR \
__STACKLESS_PYSTATE_CLEAR \
Py_CLEAR(tstate->st.thread.block_lock); \
tstate->st.thread.is_blocked = 0;
stackless_tstate.h:90
#define __STACKLESS_PYSTATE_CLEAR \
slp_kill_tasks_with_stacks(tstate); \
Py_CLEAR(tstate->st.initial_stub);
stacklesseval.c:131
void slp_kill_tasks_with_stacks(PyThreadState *ts)
{
Am I missing something, or is this not doing exactly what we are
discussing already?
That leaves tasklets without cstates, which should.. be handled nicely.
Cheers,
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
