Hi Richard,
I have done some testing and running the following code in WingIDE results
in a different output from running it in Eclipse:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
import stackless
class BombPasser(object):
def __init__(self, name, other = None):
self.name = name
self.other = other
if other:
other.other = self
self.channel = stackless.channel()
self.tasklet = stackless.tasklet(self.run)()
def run(self):
print self.name, 'started'
while True:
counter = self.channel.receive() - 1
print 'in %s: counter = %s' % (self.name, counter)
if counter == 0:
raise Exception(self.name + " did BOOM")
self.other.channel.send(counter)
stackless.schedule()
if __name__ == "__main__":
a1 = BombPasser('bob')
a2 = BombPasser('tim', other = a1)
a1.channel.send(5)
try:
stackless.run()
except Exception as e:
print e.message
print '=============== DONE ================='
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wing:
bob started
in bob: counter = 4
tim started
in tim: counter = 3
in bob: counter = 2
in tim: counter = 1
in bob: counter = 0
Unhandled exception in thread started by <bound method BombPasser.run of
<__main__.BombPasser object at 0x02583810>>
although the 'BOOM' exception does show up in the exception tool.
PyDev:
bob started
in bob: counter = 4
tim started
in tim: counter = 3
in bob: counter = 2
in tim: counter = 1
in bob: counter = 0
bob did BOOM
=============== DONE =================
What i thought would happen.
I have sent this as a bug report to WIngWare.
Cheers, Lars
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Richard Tew <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:23 AM, lars van Gemerden <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > It was my inexeprience with WingIDE that did it. In the debug window it
> says
> > unhandled exception, but in the exception tool it shows that the
> exception
> > is caught normally.
> >
> > Am I correct in concluding that the stackless scheduler is not emptied
> upon
> > such an exception?
>
> Write some code to test this conclusion ;-) It should only take you 30
> seconds.
>
> > PS: I will try the code you suggested for emptying the scheduler. I you
> > like, i'll let you know the result.
>
> No need :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Richard.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stackless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
>
--
====================================
Lars van Gemerden
[email protected]
+31 6 26 88 55 39
====================================
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
