Have you tried regular CPython 2.7? It is possible that 2.7 doesn't support that platform yet. K
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Hervé Coatanhay > Sent: 4. apríl 2014 12:46 > To: The Stackless Python Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Stackless] MacOS stackless installers needed > > I am having trouble building an installer on Mac OS X 10.9, (I had to change > build-installer.py to change LDFLAGS). > > @Robert Did you build the last installer on Mavericks with XCode 5.1? > Did you do anything special ? My command line is: > > ./build-installer.py > --sdk- > path=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.plat > form/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk/ > --dep-target=10.8 --universal-archs=intel > > And I had to remove this from LDFLAGS: > - > syslibroot,/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX > .platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk > > I grabbed the source from > https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless and trie to build from 2.7-slp > branch. > > I'm thinking it is too much changes already just to build an installer, I > must do > something wrong. > > Cheers > Hervé > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Filip M. Nowak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > On 03.04.2014 15:28, Hervé Coatanhay wrote: > >> Hi FIlip, > >> Both MacOS installer and homebrew use the framework-approach. This > >> left prefix-approach for people that feels like hacking around IMHO. > > > > "hackishness" of prefix-approach is a matter of open discussion I > > would say. I must admit that I used to prefix-based way (and it is > > extensively used in many POSIX OSes packaging systems) but I agree > > that for Mac OS X framework thingy is more proper. > > > >> For Homebrew, it might be as simple as creating a "keg only" > >> Stackless Formula provided by a "Tap" on github. > >> > >> Concerning MacOS Installer, as I understand it, we're facing the > >> following choice: > >> > >> - provide a Stackless installer which override official CPython > >> installer (the choice made so far) > >> - change build-script.py to change the "framework name" > > > > I would go for the second option (with installer) - but again, it's > > just me. This would be less confusing, easier and probably safer for > > packager himself :) . At the end what's the goal? Basically - to > > provide usable and nice enough instance of Stackless for Mac OS x? If so > this would do. > > > >> Does it sum it up well ? > > > > Absolutely. > > > >> Hervé > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Filip M. Nowak <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> (...) > > > > All the best, > > Filip > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Stackless mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
