Denis, Despite what the website says, Stackless can be as simple as you want to make it.
Use the same compiler that is used by Python. Use the same revision tags as Python but with the added 'slp'. If you find the website confusing please point out where it is confusing and ideally the particular words you find confusing on it. Cheers, Richard. On 5/6/14, Denis Fourt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I would like to try stackless. I am using macos 10.9 presently (in case of > trouble I can still use 10.6). There is no ready to use installer that match > the version of the already installed (by apple) python, so I do not think > this is the best way (even if the versions had matched I would have avoided > it, CPython does not replace the original, why Stackless should?) > I can download the sources or clone the repository, but :I do not know which > revision/branch/tag to use (the information on the web site looks a bit out > dated)I do not know which compiler to use : clang or the old gcc4.2if the > compiler choice has an impact later when installing packages. > An alternative would be to use PyPy : for what reasons should I prefer > Stackless (not taking into account the fact that some Python packages like > numpy do not work with PyPy)? > Thanks for the help, > Denis _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
