> On 06/21/2010 10:06 AM, Josh Simon wrote:
>> I'm seeing seriously degraded performance with round-robin SAS
>> multipathing. I'm hoping you guys can help me achieve full throughput
>> across both paths...

[email protected] said:
> Hi Josh, I suggest logging a bug on bugs.opensolaris.org, using solaris /
> driver / mptsas. Please include the info you sent in the earlier message too.

Has this bug turned up in the database yet?  I want to file a "me too".
Except for us, this is Solaris-10U8 (not snv_134), and it's the mpt driver
(not mpt_sas).

After seeing this problem report, I tried turning off the 2nd path on each
of the 2TB "Near-Line SAS" drives in our Dell MD1200 array.  Sequential
write performance went up by 4.25 times.  Making the same change to
an identical server with a J4400 and 1TB SATA drives resulted in only an
incremental improvement in bandwidth:

        filebench fileio, multistreamwrite-1M:

        MD1200, 2TB SAS, mpxio round-robin:    131 MB/sec
        MD1200, 2TB SAS, mpxio static single:  557 MB/sec

        J4400, 1TB SATA, mpxio round-robin:    427 MB/sec
        J4400, 1TB SATA, mpxio static single:  498 MB/sec


Note that on the MD1200, with round-robin in effect, the drives were
showing 100%-busy with service-times in the 300 msec range.  With the
static single-path in effect, service-times dropped to the 30 msec range.

The above numbers were observed on this type of pool layout (both systems):

        NAME                       STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        f1b_zp1                    ONLINE       0     0     0
          raidz2                   ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D641DDd0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D55B13d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D5B9B4d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D6EF76d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D07BC2d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D6DBA5d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
          raidz2                   ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D6CCB2d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D6A126d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D641BBd0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D65228d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D6C530d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c5t5000C50014D6E35Ed0  ONLINE       0     0     0


Regards,

Marion


_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to