On  2/07/10 06:49 AM, Marion Hakanson wrote:
On 06/21/2010 10:06 AM, Josh Simon wrote:
I'm seeing seriously degraded performance with round-robin SAS
multipathing. I'm hoping you guys can help me achieve full throughput
across both paths...

[email protected] said:
Hi Josh, I suggest logging a bug on bugs.opensolaris.org, using solaris /
driver / mptsas. Please include the info you sent in the earlier message too.

Has this bug turned up in the database yet?  I want to file a "me too".
Except for us, this is Solaris-10U8 (not snv_134), and it's the mpt driver
(not mpt_sas).

Hi Marion,
different driver --> different bug.

Josh's bug is 6963122.

You should file a new one - bugs.opensolaris.org, Product Solaris,
Category kernel, Subcategory driver-mpt-x86.

I suggest looking at the public comments field for Josh's bug first,
though - the RE for that bug has some D you can run to help narrow
down the performance problem point.


cheers,
James



After seeing this problem report, I tried turning off the 2nd path on each
of the 2TB "Near-Line SAS" drives in our Dell MD1200 array.  Sequential
write performance went up by 4.25 times.  Making the same change to
an identical server with a J4400 and 1TB SATA drives resulted in only an
incremental improvement in bandwidth:

        filebench fileio, multistreamwrite-1M:

        MD1200, 2TB SAS, mpxio round-robin:    131 MB/sec
        MD1200, 2TB SAS, mpxio static single:  557 MB/sec

        J4400, 1TB SATA, mpxio round-robin:    427 MB/sec
        J4400, 1TB SATA, mpxio static single:  498 MB/sec


Note that on the MD1200, with round-robin in effect, the drives were
showing 100%-busy with service-times in the 300 msec range.  With the
static single-path in effect, service-times dropped to the 30 msec range.

The above numbers were observed on this type of pool layout (both systems):

         NAME                       STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
         f1b_zp1                    ONLINE       0     0     0
           raidz2                   ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D641DDd0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D55B13d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D5B9B4d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D6EF76d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D07BC2d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D6DBA5d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
           raidz2                   ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D6CCB2d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D6A126d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D641BBd0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D65228d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D6C530d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             c5t5000C50014D6E35Ed0  ONLINE       0     0     0


Regards,

Marion




--
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to