A windstorm last week broke about 15 feet off the top of a 25 foot lodgepole 
pine near my house.  It had a canker infection where it broke which commonly 
weakens the trunks on lodgepoles in this area.  I think the top 5 feet if this 
will do quite nicely as a Christmas tree.  Most years I am able to fine fresh 
windfall trees to use, since the winds usually start back up in November here.  
Long term I am somewhat concerned about whether wind events are becoming more 
severe and blowing down more trees than average, but it does solve the 
Christmas tree issue.

Z


On Dec 13, 2013, at 6:53 AM, Keith Addison <ke...@journeytoforever.org> wrote:

> <http://livinggreenmag.com/2013/12/09/home-garden/the-great-annual-christmas-tree-debate-real-vs-artificial-aka-fake/>
> 
> The Great Annual Christmas Tree Debate: Real vs. Artificial (aka Fake)
> 
> December 9, 2013
> 
> By Richard Kujawski, Managing Editor
> 
> Decorating for the holidays often involves a Christmas tree.  Each year, 
> Americans buy about 30 million real trees and about 13 million fake ones.  
> However, since artificial trees are usually reused, the number of artificial 
> trees actually strung up each year is about 50 million.
> 
> But which choice is greener-cutting down a living tree that sequesters 
> carbon, or buying a plastic one from China that could last 6 or more years 
> but still end up in a landfill?  The right environmental choice may not be 
> clear-cut.
> 
> Brief History of the Artificial Tree
> 
> The first artificial tree, according to some source, is the wooden 
> tree-shaped pyramid with candles built by a church in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 
> in 1747.  But much more attention was paid to the feather trees first built 
> in the 1880s in Germany, where deforestation encouraged an alternative to the 
> traditional tannenbaum.  Feather trees were made of green-dyed goose feathers 
> attached to wire branches around a thin wooden post that served as the tree 
> trunk.  Candles and ornaments were also hung.
> 
> Then in 1930 the Addis Brush Company created an artificial Christmas tree 
> made from the same animal-hair bristles used for their toilet brushes, but 
> dyed green.  The bristle trees were less flammable and sturdier than feather 
> trees.
> 
> Aluminum trees showed up around 1958 and were sold for about 20 years.  
> Ironically, they were most popular in 1965, when A Charlie Brown Christmas 
> aired for the first time.  The negative treatment of the tree and poor 
> Charlie Brown changed the public's mind about their cool factor.
> 
> Today, most artificial trees are made of petroleum-based PVC, with 
> carcinogens produced during production.  Fake trees may also contain lead 
> that can be spread indoors.  If pre-decorated, they can't be recycled at the 
> end of their lifecycle.
> 
> What the Trade Groups That Represent Christmas Trees Have to Say
> 
> Both trees have plusses and minuses in the eco-footprint department.  And who 
> better to talk about each tree's strength (and point out the shortcomings of 
> the other) than their respective trade associations.
> 
> The National Christmas Tree Association (www.realchristmastrees.org) 
> represents the farms and growers of real tree.  The website doesn't say much 
> about artificial trees except that "Real Christmas Trees are not just 
> fragrant and beautiful, they are also better for the environment than fake 
> trees, inexpensive, safe, easy to care for, and an excellent choice for your 
> family's traditional Christmas celebration."
> 
> The White House Christmas Tree is real, as the site points out, and the 
> nonprofit supports Trees for Troops, which will provides18,000 free, 
> farm-grown Christmas Trees to armed forces members and their families in the 
> U.S. and overseas.  The selecting, caring for, and recycling of a real tree 
> is explained on the site.
> 
> The American Christmas Tree Association (www.christmastreeassociation.org) 
> represents the interests of the artificial trees in this country-which have 
> about an 85 percent chance of having been made in China.  Their site has lots 
> of "scare" content about real trees catching fire, and making sure bugs 
> aren't in that real tree you were just about to buy.  What is not mentioned 
> is the fact that nearly all fake trees are made from harmful plastics that 
> are non-recyclable.
> 
> (To find an artificial tree made in the USA, do an internet search for 
> "Artificial Christmas trees made in USA."
> 
> Pros and Cons
> 
> So which tree is naughty and which is nice?  Many experts point out that the 
> carbon footprint and overall environmental impact is minimal compared to 
> what's caused by our daily driving.  So you could do penance for a few days 
> by biking or carpooling and then enjoy the rest of the holiday season.
> 
> Perhaps the real choice to make is:  Which will bring more enjoyment and 
> happiness.  For some, the guilt of cutting down a tree drives them toward 
> fake needles, which can also be more convenient.  For others, the thought of 
> replacing natural with artificial is not their idea of a joyous noel.
> 
> However, for those ruled by their head and not their heart, here are some 
> factoids gathered from various sources, including the New York Times, 
> EarthTalk, and Earth911.
> 
> * Real trees are primarily grown on farms to minimize deforestation.  These 
> farms are often marginal for crops but work for trees, and preserve green 
> spaces.  However, pesticides and chemicals are used to some amount.
> 
> * Real trees generate oxygen and absorb carbon from the air while alive.  
> Artificial trees create factory pollution.
> 
> * Real trees are often recycled into mulch.  They also leave a mess of 
> needles, and require regular watering-especially if you want to minimize 
> needle loss.
> 
> * Artificial trees cost more then real trees of the same size, but tend to 
> cost less in the long run because they can be used for 6-10 years.  And more 
> money is saved with a pre-decorated tree if you don't already have a tree 
> stand, lights, and ornaments.
> 
> * Artificial trees are made of PVC plastic and eventually go to a landfill.  
> On the other hand, you save driving around each year looking for the right 
> tree.  And an artificial tree can be left up all year, saving the time of 
> packing and unpacking it.
> 
> * The environmental impact of a real tree is less than an artificial tree, 
> but still very small.
> 
> Consider a Live Tree
> 
> The most eco-friendly way to enjoy a Christmas tree is to buy a live tree 
> with its roots intact.  Find one at your local nursery or farmer's market.  
> Dig your hole when you purchase the tree, and only keep it in the house for a 
> week so you don't wake it up.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
> Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
> http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
_______________________________________________
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Reply via email to