Hi Folks,

Just a quick summary of changes to be made to the profile in the next 
version.  Did I miss anything?

1/ 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 are incorrect in their description of the usage of 
POST on the URIs.  This needs to be clarified.

2/ Add a section describing how to use SWORD headers/techniques on any 
old URI (such as those provided by the Statement), so that it is clear 
how to integrate SWORD with GData (and CMIS).  This section will be 
speculative, and will be a first attempt to articulate such an approach.

3/ Drop the 202 (Accepted) response code

4/ URI -> IRI

5/ Clearly articulate the need/use cases for Suppress-Metadata

6/ Clarify and correct the usage of the In-Progress header: it should 
only be applied to requests on the Edit-URI.  Evaluate the need for any 
further In-Progress information returned in response to operations on 
other URIs or in the Deposit Receipt and propose any appropriate changes.

7/ Enumerate and demonstrate more atom:link@rel values for the 
extensions SWORD makes to AtomPub, rather than relying on clients to 
know when they are dealing with a pure AtomPub server and when a SWORD 
server.

Cheers,

Richard



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Sword-app-techadvisorypanel mailing list
Sword-app-techadvisorypanel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-techadvisorypanel

Reply via email to