Hi Folks, Just a quick summary of changes to be made to the profile in the next version. Did I miss anything?
1/ 6.6.2 and 6.6.3 are incorrect in their description of the usage of POST on the URIs. This needs to be clarified. 2/ Add a section describing how to use SWORD headers/techniques on any old URI (such as those provided by the Statement), so that it is clear how to integrate SWORD with GData (and CMIS). This section will be speculative, and will be a first attempt to articulate such an approach. 3/ Drop the 202 (Accepted) response code 4/ URI -> IRI 5/ Clearly articulate the need/use cases for Suppress-Metadata 6/ Clarify and correct the usage of the In-Progress header: it should only be applied to requests on the Edit-URI. Evaluate the need for any further In-Progress information returned in response to operations on other URIs or in the Deposit Receipt and propose any appropriate changes. 7/ Enumerate and demonstrate more atom:link@rel values for the extensions SWORD makes to AtomPub, rather than relying on clients to know when they are dealing with a pure AtomPub server and when a SWORD server. Cheers, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Sword-app-techadvisorypanel mailing list Sword-app-techadvisorypanel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-techadvisorypanel