On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > So the same applies to plymouth, IMO -- it should only mark itself > exempt if > > it runs from the initramfs and knows that it won't interfere. > > How is this exemption specified? Would it be part of the plymouth > packaging? > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/plymouth/commit/?id=9e5a276f322cfce46b5b2ed2125cb9ec67df7e9f -- Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel