On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > So the same applies to plymouth, IMO -- it should only mark itself
> exempt if
> > it runs from the initramfs and knows that it won't interfere.
>
> How is this exemption specified? Would it be part of the plymouth
> packaging?
>

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/plymouth/commit/?id=9e5a276f322cfce46b5b2ed2125cb9ec67df7e9f

-- 
Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to