18.04.2017 21:35, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard пишет:
> "Igal @ Lucee.org" <i...@lucee.org>:
>> Examples I see online use forking [...]
> 
> ... because they are bad examples.  Read
> http://jdebp.eu./FGA/systemd-house-of-horror/tomcat.html .

Service type simple is the worst possible type as it does not provide
for any synchronization between started process and dependent services.
So examples that recommend forking are correct (as long as forking is
implemented correctly). If you have choice between working forking and
simple, forking is definitely preferred.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to