On Thu, 15.06.17 18:22, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:

> > Hmm, that wasn't the actual question though, was it? The point was just
> > to make networkd ignore carrier status (i.e. often there's no need to
> > remove addresses just because the interface is down for a moment), not
> > to stop managing halfway.

Adding an option "IgnoreCarrier=" or so would be OK I figure. Best way
to get it implemented is submitting a PR for it ;-)

> Yes thats what I am looking for.

Well, you'd still use the tool outside of its intended usecase, so
ymmv...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to