OJB and Hibernate both focus on persisting arbitrary Java classes, compared to Torque which uses code generation to create the persistent classes.
-Brian
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 12:53 PM, Keeney, Thomas wrote:
Hi all!
I've been using Torque for almost 2 years now, and I have to say it's a
great product. However, I've been wanting to try another persistence
framework lately (call it wanderlust!). Does anyone have any thoughts on
using Hibernate and how it compares with Torque? I've checked out the
Hibernate documentation and it appears to handle more complex distributed
applications better than Torque (optimistic locking support, etc).
Thanks,
Tom Keeney ------------------------------- Phone: 202-824-5143
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
