I don't have the experience that you do with Torque, but I have at least tried it. I have just about as much experience with Hibernate. That being said, I think I like Hibernate more. I feel, personally, that Hibernate is simpler then Torque. There also seems to be more wide spread use of Hibernate. It is integreated with XDoclet, Middlegen and used by many in JBoss and Struts. I found it easier to use BLOB/CLOBs, the query interface was much easier for me and you don't have to regenerate your object model if you add a column since Hibernate uses a mapping xml architecture. I think you will like Hibernate if you give it a try.
-----Original Message----- From: Keeney, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:54 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Hibernate vs. Torque Hi all! I've been using Torque for almost 2 years now, and I have to say it's a great product. However, I've been wanting to try another persistence framework lately (call it wanderlust!). Does anyone have any thoughts on using Hibernate and how it compares with Torque? I've checked out the Hibernate documentation and it appears to handle more complex distributed applications better than Torque (optimistic locking support, etc). Thanks, Tom Keeney ------------------------------- Phone: 202-824-5143 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
