Ivan Frade
Sat, 16 May 2009 02:30:52 -0700
hi On 5/16/09, Philip Van Hoof <s...@pvanhoof.be> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:20 +0200, Michele Tameni wrote: > > Hi Michele, > >> I'm looking for an alternative to use soprano as RDF storage for a >> work that i'm going to do, and i've read that tracker are going to to >> what i need.
Tracker is not a generic rdf storage: internally it "compiles" the ontology into sql and everything must follow that ontology (in a generic triplet store you can put whatever triplets you want, no matter the ontology). Right now it works with the nepomuk ontologies and supports sparQL with the API that philip described. it could be possible to replace those ontologies with others relevant for your project, but AFAIK nobody tried that yet. >> Reading the features page on the site [ >> http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/features.html ] object store seem >> what i need, and reading this page [ >> http://live.gnome.org/Tracker/Documentation/AppDevelopersManual ] it >> seam that rdf storage is possibile. > > This AppDevelopersManual is outdated. hey!!!! It is incomplete and useless at the moment, but a work in progress :) > >> there is an api that permit to store object and their metadata that >> allow me to forget rdf? It is difficult to forget RDF using a rdf storage :). But we use the turtle format for the triplets to make it less painful. Turtle is much nicer and easier to handle/read/write than rdf/xml. regards, Ivan _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list