Re: [Turbolucene] python 2.6 compatibility

[Paul Rigor (ucla)]

Thanks Krys!Paul

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Krys Lawrence <k...@krys.ca> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your interest in TurboLucene! :)
>
> Unfortunately, I have not maintained TurboLucene for a long time.  I do not
> use it personally anymore and have lost the motivation to do anything with
> it.
>
> That said, I believe that PyLucene works differently now and no longer has
> the
> issue (thread conflicts with CherryPy) that TurboLucene was initially
> created
> to solve.  Also TurboGears 2.0 no longer even uses CherryPy, making it
> further
> a moot point.
>
> My recommendation to you would be to just try using PyLucene directly.
>  It's a
> pretty awesome project and reasonably easy to get started with.  More to
> the
> point, it is supported and not abandoned! :)
>
> Alternatively, depending on your needs, you might want to check out Woosh.
> It's a pure-Python search library that looks interesting.
>
> Anyway, I hope this helps.
>
> Good luck to you!
> Krys
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2009 12:51:14 am Paul Rigor (ucla) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Are there any issues with python 2.6?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
>
>


-- 
Paul Rigor
Graduate Student
Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics
Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences
University of California, Irvine
http://www.paulrigor.net/
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor

_______________________________________________
TurboLucene mailing list
TurboLucene@lists.krys.ca
http://lists.krys.ca/mailman/listinfo/turbolucene