Simon Nash
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:18:48 -0700
This proposal looks good to me. I'd be happy to see the Apache Tuscany project listed as an interested party. Simon Stéphane Drapeau wrote:
Hi, I created an entry [0] in the Eclipse bugzilla with the proposal. Your comments are welcome. Best regards Stéphane Drapeau Obeo [0]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225956 On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Stéphane Drapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Haleh, Raymond, Thank you for your answers. Haleh, you're right. I make no distinction between tools for SCA developers and tools for SCA users. The goal of the project is to develop tools to help users of the SCA technology. I will modify my sentence. Stéphane Drapeau Obeo On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:21 AM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi Stephan, This looks good since it looks like tools for SCA will get more focus :) I have a question. You mention "the goals of the new sub-project are to develop a set of tools for SCA developers and SCA users". What is the difference between SCA developer and SCA user in this context? Haleh On 4/2/08, Stéphane Drapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi Jean-Sebastien, Haleh, all, The proposal is a 3 pages document describing the scope/intent of the proposed project. The outline is: 1. Introduction: the proposition of the transformation of the STP/SCA component into a sub-project named SCA Tools under the top levelprojectSTP. 2. Background: presentation of STP + presentation of the existingSTP/SCAcomponent. 3. Description: the goals of the new sub-project are to develop a setoftools for SCA developers and SCA users. Another goal is also to linkthissub-project with other components of STP (Service Creation, PolicyEditor)4. Proposed components: SCA Domain Model (SCA meta model), SCACompositeDesigner, SCA Composite Editors (tree, xml and form), SCA Integration (integration with other STP components) 5. Relationship with Other Eclipse Projects: STP, EMF, GMF, M2M, ... 6. Organization: this sub-project will take place under the top level project STP. 7. A list of proposed initial committers. 8. Code Contribution: the Eclipse STP/SCA component will be theinitialcode. 9. Interested parties: this section lists companies and communitiesthatsupport the creation of the project. They don't take otherengagements.10. Tentative Plan for 2008 and 2009. Our goal is to identify formally the scope of the tools that wedeveloparound SCA. The new status will provide some advantages. - I think that the SCA tools will be more visible in the Eclipsecommunityif we are identified as a sub-project. - From the users point of view, it will not change anything. - Concerning us, we should be more formal: clear roadmap, new features described/discussed first in bugzilla, ... - It will also present some advantages for Obeo by becoming asub-projectleader. In the near future all STP components will become STP sub-projects. To summarize, all of this is purely administrative. I will send you the proposal document ASAP. If you have any questions, don't hesitate. Haleh, yesterday I sent you more information about the SCA Composite Designer on the thread named "[Website] - Tooling for Java SCA". Youcanadd it on the web page. Tell me if you need more/different information. My post describes what version of Tuscany can be used. I alsointroduce atutorial that I made. This tutorial is based on the SCA designer and Tuscany 1.1. Best regards, Stéphane Drapeau Obeo On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:05 AM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:Hi Stephane, Welcome to Tuscany. How will changing the status of STP SCA from a component to a sub project change its future development and focus? Tuscany community had asked about tools for SCA and because of thatIrecently added a website page [1] to collect more information about available open source tools. I added a link to STP there. It wouldbegreat if you could provide more content about what is available and whatversionof Tuscany it works with. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/java-sca-tools.html Haleh On 4/1/08, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Stéphane Drapeau wrote:Hi, I'm Stéphane Drapeau from Obeo. I work on tools for SCA and IleadtheEclipse SCA component which is a component of the STP project[1].Currently, I'm writing a proposal to change the status of theSTPSCA*component* to STP/SCA Tools *sub project*. I would like know if I can refer Tuscany community as interestedpartyofour proposal. It's purely administrative. Jean Sebastien told me that the Tuscany community must vote onthisissue.So the discussion is open ;) Thanks very much. Best regards Stéphane Drapeau Obeo [1]: http://www.eclipse.org/stp/sca/index.phpHi Stephane, Thanks for posting here, it'll enable the whole Tuscany communitytogetinvolved in the discussion around your SCA editor proposal. Can you tell us a bit more about the proposal? do you have anoutline?Also can you help us understand what it means to be listed under "interested parties" in such a proposal? Any questions or thoughts from others on the list? -- Jean-Sebastien---------------------------------------------------------------------To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]